2 research outputs found

    Output error methods for robot identification

    Get PDF
    Industrial robot identification is usually based on the inverse dynamic model (IDIM) that comes from Newton’s laws and has the advantage of being linear with respect to the parameters. Building the IDIM from the measurement signals allows the use of linear regression techniques like the least-squares (LS) or the instrumental variable (IV) for instance. Nonetheless, this involves a careful preprocessing to deal with sensor noise. An alternative in system identification is to consider an output error approach where the model’s parameters are iteratively tuned in order to match the simulated model’s output and the measured system’s output. This paper proposes an extensive comparison of three different output error approaches in the context of robot identification. One of the main outcomes of this work is to show that choosing the input torque as target identification signal instead of the output position may lead to a gain in robustness versus modeling errors and noise and in computational time. Theoretical developments are illustrated on a six degrees-of-freedom rigid robo

    Identification of rigid industrial robots - A system identification perspective

    Get PDF
    In modern manufacturing, industrial robots are essential components that allow saving cost, increase quality and productivity for instance. To achieve such goals, high accuracy and speed are simultaneously required. The design of control laws compliant with such requirements demands high-fidelity mathematical models of those robots. For this purpose, dynamic models are built from experimental data. The main objective of this thesis is thus to provide robotic engineers with automatic tools for identifying dynamic models of industrial robot arms. To achieve this aim, a comparative analysis of the existing methods dealing with robot identification is made. That allows discerning the advantages and the limitations of each method. From those observations, contributions are presented on three axes. First, the study focuses on the estimation of the joint velocities and accelerations from the measured position, which is required for the model construction. The usual method is based on a home-made prefiltering process that needs a reliable knowledge of the system’s bandwidths, whereas the system is still unknown. To overcome this dilemma, we propose a method able to estimate the joint derivatives automatically, without any setting from the user. The second axis is dedicated to the identification of the controller. For the vast majority of the method its knowledge is indeed required. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, that is not always available to the user. To deal with this issue, two methods are suggested. Their basic philosophy is to identify the control law in a first step before identifying the dynamic model of the robot in a second one. The first method consists in identifying the control law in a parametric way, whereas the second one relies on a non-parametric identification. Finally, the third axis deals with the home-made setting of the decimate filter. The identification of the noise filter is introduced similarly to methods developed in the system identification community. This allows estimating automatically the dynamic parameters with low covariance and it brings some information about the noise circulation through the closed-loop system. All the proposed methodologies are validated on an industrial robot with 6 degrees of freedom. Perspectives are outlined for future developments on robotic systems identification and other complex problems
    corecore