Geometric overlapping coefcients for calculating the required emitters per plant in drip irrigation

[EN] The designer of irrigation systems must consider a complex combination of emitter type, emitter uniformity, hydraulics, topography, desired water distribution, crop salt tolerance, water requirements, water quality, fertilizer injection, soil salinity, cultural practices, and other site-specifc conditions. In contrast to the approaches applied for the hydraulic design of irrigation installations, there is not a clear, general and consolidated design criterion for calculating the number required emitters per plant. In most cases, given the wide spectrum of possible scenarios, only guideline recommendations can be found, and the fnal decision is often based on the subjective experience of the designer or grower. This paper aims at revising, clarifying and refning the existing published guidelines and methodologies for estimating the required emitters per plant in drip irrigation, focussing on the Montalvo approach. The agronomic design should satisfy, among others, two specifc conditions: (i) the emitters should wet at least a minimum threshold of the soil area (or volume) corresponding to the plant for ensuring a proper development of the roots; (ii) overlapping between emitter bulbs is required for merging wetted volumes and avoiding salt concentration near the root zone. Relying on this basis, a thorough theoretical geometric analysis of the overlapping between wet bulbs of contiguous emitters is carried out. As a result, Montalvo's overlapping coefcients are deduced here. This author assumes an identical net wetted area for all emitters in the laterals, but it can be stated that the overlapping areas between emitters difer in extreme emitters and interior emitters, as well as in confgurations with one lateral per plant row and two laterals per plant row. Therefore, this study proposes new formulations for the computation of the overlapping coefcient, which need to incorporate the number of emitters as an additional variable, as well as to distinguish between the presence of one or two laterals per plant row, and between grouped and non-grouped emitters. In one lateral per plant row, the original overlapping coefcient underestimates the net wetted area by one emitter and thus overestimates the theoretical number of required emitters. In the case of two laterals per plant row, the original overlapping coefcient overestimates the net wetted area in the interior emitters, and thus underestimates the theoretical number of required emitters per plant. The presented formulations are applied in diferent practical examples covering a wide range of scenarios. The results allow a general overview of the infuence of the soil type, the emitter fow rate, and the selected overlapping ratio in the number of required emitters per plant. The revision of guidelines and methods presented here, complemented with other experimental results and models of soil water dynamics under drip irrigation, might contribute to a better decision making of designers and feld engineers.Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.Martí, P.; González Altozano, P.; Gasque Albalate, M.; Turegano Pastor, JV.; Royuela, A. (2023). Geometric overlapping coefcients for calculating the required emitters per plant in drip irrigation. Irrigation Science. 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-023-00898-z120Al-Ogaidi AAM, Wayayok A, Rowshon MK, Fikri Abdullah A (2016) Wetting patterns estimation under drip irrigation Systems using an enhanced empirical model. Agric Water Manag 176:203–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2016.06.002ASAE EP 405.1 1988 (R2019) Design and installation of microirrigation systems. American Society of Agricultural Engineers. USAAtkinson D (1983) The growth, activity and distribution of the fruit tree root system. Plant Soil 71:23–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02182638Ayars J E, Hutmacher RB, Schoneman RA, Vail SS, Patton SH, Felleke D (1985) Salt distribution under cotton trickle irrigated with saline water. In: Drip/Trickle Irrigation in Action. Proc. Third Drip/Trickle Irrigation Congress, Fresno, California. Nov. 18–21, 1985. ASAE. Vol 2:666–672Ayars JE, Bucks DA, Lamm FR, Nakayama FS (2007) Introduction. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama FS (eds) Microirrigation for crop production. Design, operation, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 1–26Bar-Yosef B, Sagiv B, Markovitch T (1989) Sweet corn response to surface and subsurface trickle phosphorus fertigation. Agron J 81:443–447Benami A, Ofen A (1983) Irrigation engineering. Irrigation Engineering Scientific Publication, Haifa, IsraelBielorai H (1985) Moisture, salinity, and root distribution in drip irrigated grapefruit. In: Drip/Trickle Irrigation in Action. Proc. Third Drip/Trickle Irrigation Congress, Fresno, California. Nov. 18–21, 1985. ASAE Vol 2:562–567Black JDF, West DW (1974) Water uptake by an apple tree with various proportions of the root system supplied with water. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Drip Irrigation Congress. California, USA. pp 32–433Clark GA, Haman DZ, Prochaska JF, Yitayew M (2007) General system design principles. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama FS (eds) Microirrigation for crop production. Design, operation, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 161–220del Vigo Á, Zubelzu S, Juana L (2020) Numerical routine for soil dynamics from trickle irrigation. Appl Math Model 83:371–385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apm.2020.01.058del Vigo Á, Juana L, Rodriguez-Sinobas L (2022) Modelo numérico de simulación de flujo de agua en el suelo afectado por la absorción de la raíz. Ingeniería Del Agua 26(1):37–46. https://doi.org/10.4995/ia.2022.16531del Vigo Á, Colimba J, Juana L, Rodriguez-Sinobas L (2023) Numerical model for the simulation of soil water flow under root-absorption conditions. Application to tomato plant crop. Irrig Sci 41:141–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-022-00806-xFriedman SP, Communar G, Gamliel A (2016) DIDAS-User-friendly software package for assisting drip irrigation design and scheduling. Comput Electron Agric 120:36–52Howell TA, Meron M, Davis KR, Phene CJ, Yamada H (1987) Water management of trickle and furrow irrigated narrow row cotton in the San Joaquin Valley. Appl Eng Agric 3:222–227. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.26678Karmeli D, Peri G, Todes M (1985) Irrigation Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, Design and operationKarimi B, Mohammadi P, Sanikhani H, Salih SQ, Yassen ZM (2020) Modeling wetted areas of moisture bulb for drip irrigation systems: an enhanced empirical model and artificial neural network. Comput Electron Agric 178(11):105767. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2020.105767Keller J (1978) Trickle irrigation. Section 15-7. National Engineering Handbook. Soil Conservation Service. USDA, USAKeller J, Karmeli D (1974) Trickle irrigation design. Rainbird Sprinkler Manufacturing Corporation, Glendora, CaliforniaLevin I, Assaf R, Bravdo B (1979) Soil moisture and root distribution in an apple orchard irrigated by tricklers. Plant Soil 52:31–40. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02197729Meiri A, Frenkel H, Mantell A (1992) Cotton response to water and salinity under sprinkler and drip irrigation. Agron J 84:44–50Montalvo T (2003) Riego localizado: diseño de instalaciones. Inter-técnica, SpainOzgur K, Payam K, Salim H, Bakhtiar K, Nazir K (2021) Modeling wetting front redistribution of drip irrigation systems using a new machine learning method: adaptive neuro- fuzzy system improved by hybrid particle swarm optimization – gravity search algorithm. Agric Water Manag 256:107067. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.107067Pizarro F (1996) Riegos Localizados de alta frecuencia: goteo, microaspersión, exudación. Mundi-Prensa, SpainPlaut Z, Carmi A, Grava A (1988) Cotton growth and production under drip-irrigation restricted soil wetting. Irrig Sci 9:143–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00262356Rodrigo J, Hernández JM, Pérez A, González JF (1997) Riego localizado. Mundi-Prensa, SpainRusso D (1987) Lettuce yield-irrigation water quality and quantity relationships in a gypsiferous desert soil. Agron J 79:8–14Schwankl LJ, Hanson BR (2007) Surface drip irrigation. In: Lamm FR, Ayars JE, Nakayama FS (eds) Microirrigation for crop production. Design, operation, and management. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 431–472Schwankl LJ, Edstrom J, Hopmans J, Andreu L, Koumanov K (1999) Microsprinklers wet larger soil volume; boost almond yield, tree growth. Calif Agric 53(2):39–43Schwartzman M, Zur B (1986) Emitter spacing and geometry of wetted soil volume. J Irrig Drain Eng 112(3):242–253. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9437(1986)112:3(242)Shiri J, Karimi B, Karimi N, Kazemi MH, Karimi S (2020) Simulating wetting front dimensions of drip irrigation systems: multi criteria assessment of soft computing models. J Hydrol 585:124792. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124792Šimůnek J, van Genuchten MT, Šejna M (2006) The HYDRUS software package for simulating the two- and three-dimensional movement of water, heat, and multiple solutes in variably-saturated media, Technical Manual Version 1.0 University of California Riverside. Riverside, CA, 3PC. Progress, Prague. Czech RepublicŠimůnek J, van Genuchten MT, Šejna M (2016) Recent developments and applications of the HYDRUS computer software packages. Vadose Zone J 15(7):1–25. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2016.04.0033USDA-NRCS (USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service) (1984) Trickle irrigation, national engineering handbook. Section 15, Ch 7Waller P, Yitayew M (2016) Irrigation and drainage engineering. Springer International Publishing, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05699-9Wang J, Chen R (2020) An improved finite element model for the hydraulic analysis of drip irrigation subunits considering local emitter head loss. Irrig Sci 38:147–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-019-00656-0Willoughby YP, Cockroft B (1974) Changes in root patterns of peach trees under tickle irrigation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Drip Irrigation Congress. California, USA. pp 439–44