A Cross-project Defect Prediction Model Using Feature Transfer and Ensemble Learning

Cross-project defect prediction (CPDP) trains the prediction models with existing data from other projects (the source projects) and uses the trained model to predict the target projects. To solve two major problems in CPDP, namely, variability in data distribution and class imbalance, in this paper we raise a CPDP model combining feature transfer and ensemble learning, with two stages of feature transfer and the classification. The feature transfer method is based on Pearson correlation coefficient, which reduces the dimension of feature space and the difference of feature distribution between items. The class imbalance is solved by SMOTE and Voting on both algorithm and data levels. The experimental results on 20 source-target projects show that our method can yield significant improvement on CPDP

Heterogeneous Cross-Project Defect Prediction using Encoder and Transfer Learning

Heterogeneous cross-project defect prediction (HCPDP) aims to predict defects in new software projects using defect data from previous software projects where the source and target projects have some different metrics. Most existing methods only find linear relationships in the software defect features and datasets. Additionally, these methods use multiple defect datasets from different projects as source datasets. In this paper, we propose a novel method called heterogeneous cross-project defect prediction using encoder and transfer learning (ETL). ETL uses encoders to extract the important features from source and target datasets. Also, to minimize negative transfer during transfer learning, we used an augmented dataset that contains pseudo-labels and the source dataset. Additionally, we have used very limited data to train the model. To evaluate the performance of the ETL approach, 16 datasets from four publicly available software defect projects were used. Furthermore, we compared the proposed method with four HCPDP methods namely EGW, HDP&amp;#x005F;KS, CTKCCA and EMKCA, and one WPDP method from existing literature. The proposed method on average outperforms the baseline methods in terms of PD, PF, F1-score, G-mean and AUC.</p