86 research outputs found

    Cooperative colorings of trees and of bipartite graphs

    Get PDF
    Given a system (G1,,Gm)(G_1, \ldots ,G_m) of graphs on the same vertex set VV, a cooperative coloring is a choice of vertex sets I1,,ImI_1, \ldots ,I_m, such that IjI_j is independent in GjG_j and j=1mIj=V\bigcup_{j=1}^{m}I_j = V. For a class G\mathcal{G} of graphs, let mG(d)m_{\mathcal{G}}(d) be the minimal mm such that every mm graphs from G\mathcal{G} with maximum degree dd have a cooperative coloring. We prove that Ω(loglogd)mT(d)O(logd)\Omega(\log\log d) \le m_\mathcal{T}(d) \le O(\log d) and Ω(logd)mB(d)O(d/logd)\Omega(\log d)\le m_\mathcal{B}(d) \le O(d/\log d), where T\mathcal{T} is the class of trees and B\mathcal{B} is the class of bipartite graphs.Comment: 8 pages, 2 figures, accepted to the Electronic Journal of Combinatorics, corrections suggested by the referees have been incorporate

    Cooperative colorings of trees and of bipartite graphs

    Get PDF
    International audienceGiven a system (G 1 ,. .. , G m) of graphs on the same vertex set V , a cooperative coloring is a choice of vertex sets I 1 ,. .. , I m , such that I j is independent in G j and m j=1 I j = V. For a class G of graphs, let m G (d) be the minimal m such that every m graphs from G with maximum degree d have a cooperative coloring. We prove that Ω(log log d) m T (d) O(log d) and Ω(log d) m B (d)

    Cooperative coloring of some graph families

    Full text link
    Given a family of graphs {G1,,Gm}\{G_1,\ldots, G_m\} on the vertex set VV, a cooperative coloring of it is a choice of independent sets IiI_i in GiG_i (1im)(1\leq i\leq m) such that i=1mIi=V\bigcup^m_{i=1}I_i=V. For a graph class G\mathcal{G}, let mG(d)m_{\mathcal{G}}(d) be the minimum mm such that every graph family {G1,,Gm}\{G_1,\ldots,G_m\} with GjGG_j\in\mathcal{G} and Δ(Gj)d\Delta(G_j)\leq d for j[m]j\in [m], has a cooperative coloring. For T\mathcal{T} the class of trees and W\mathcal{W} the class of wheels, we get that mT(3)=4m_\mathcal{T}(3)=4 and mW(4)=5m_\mathcal{W}(4)=5. Also, we show that mBbc(d)=O(log2d)m_{\mathcal{B}_{bc}}(d)=O(\log_2 d) and mBk(d)=O(logdloglogd)m_{\mathcal{B}_k}(d)=O\big(\frac{\log d}{\log\log d}\big), where Bbc\mathcal{B}_{bc} is the class of graphs whose components are balanced complete bipartite graphs, and Bk\mathcal{B}_k is the class of bipartite graphs with one part size at most kk

    Complexity of Computing the Shapley Value in Games with Externalities

    Full text link
    We study the complexity of computing the Shapley value in games with externalities. We focus on two representations based on marginal contribution nets (embedded MC-nets and weighted MC-nets). Our results show that while weighted MC-nets are more concise than embedded MC-nets, they have slightly worse computational properties when it comes to computing the Shapley value

    Information Inequalities for Joint Distributions, with Interpretations and Applications

    Full text link
    Upper and lower bounds are obtained for the joint entropy of a collection of random variables in terms of an arbitrary collection of subset joint entropies. These inequalities generalize Shannon's chain rule for entropy as well as inequalities of Han, Fujishige and Shearer. A duality between the upper and lower bounds for joint entropy is developed. All of these results are shown to be special cases of general, new results for submodular functions-- thus, the inequalities presented constitute a richly structured class of Shannon-type inequalities. The new inequalities are applied to obtain new results in combinatorics, such as bounds on the number of independent sets in an arbitrary graph and the number of zero-error source-channel codes, as well as new determinantal inequalities in matrix theory. A new inequality for relative entropies is also developed, along with interpretations in terms of hypothesis testing. Finally, revealing connections of the results to literature in economics, computer science, and physics are explored.Comment: 15 pages, 1 figure. Originally submitted to the IEEE Transactions on Information Theory in May 2007, the current version incorporates reviewer comments including elimination of an erro

    Proceedings of the 8th Cologne-Twente Workshop on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimization

    No full text
    International audienceThe Cologne-Twente Workshop (CTW) on Graphs and Combinatorial Optimization started off as a series of workshops organized bi-annually by either Köln University or Twente University. As its importance grew over time, it re-centered its geographical focus by including northern Italy (CTW04 in Menaggio, on the lake Como and CTW08 in Gargnano, on the Garda lake). This year, CTW (in its eighth edition) will be staged in France for the first time: more precisely in the heart of Paris, at the Conservatoire National d’Arts et Métiers (CNAM), between 2nd and 4th June 2009, by a mixed organizing committee with members from LIX, Ecole Polytechnique and CEDRIC, CNAM

    Transversal factors and spanning trees

    Full text link
    Given a collection of graphs G=(G1,,Gm)\mathbf{G}=(G_1, \ldots, G_m) with the same vertex set, an mm-edge graph Hi[m]GiH\subset \cup_{i\in [m]}G_i is a transversal if there is a bijection ϕ:E(H)[m]\phi:E(H)\to [m] such that eE(Gϕ(e))e\in E(G_{\phi(e)}) for each eE(H)e\in E(H). We give asymptotically-tight minimum degree conditions for a graph collection on an nn-vertex set to have a transversal which is a copy of a graph HH, when HH is an nn-vertex graph which is an FF-factor or a tree with maximum degree o(n/logn)o(n/\log n).Comment: 21 page
    corecore