852 research outputs found

    Convergence of a nonconforming multiscale finite element method

    Get PDF
    The multiscale finite element method (MsFEM) [T. Y. Hou, X. H. Wu, and Z. Cai, Math. Comp., 1998, to appear; T. Y. Hou and X. H. Wu, J. Comput. Phys., 134 (1997), pp. 169-189] has been introduced to capture the large scale solutions of elliptic equations with highly oscillatory coefficients. This is accomplished by constructing the multiscale base functions from the local solutions of the elliptic operator. Our previous study reveals that the leading order error in this approach is caused by the "resonant sampling," which leads to large error when the mesh size is close to the small scale of the continuous problem. Similar difficulty also arises in numerical upscaling methods. An oversampling technique has been introduced to alleviate this difficulty [T. Y. Hou and X. H. Wu, J. Comput. Phys., 134 (1997), pp. 169-189]. A consequence of the oversampling method is that the resulting finite element method is no longer conforming. Here we give a detailed analysis of the nonconforming error. Our analysis also reveals a new cell resonance error which is caused by the mismatch between the mesh size and the wavelength of the small scale. We show that the cell resonance error is of lower order. Our numerical experiments demonstrate that the cell resonance error is generically small and is difficult to observe in practice

    Removing the cell resonance error in the multiscale finite element method via a Petrov-Galerkin formulation

    Get PDF
    We continue the study of the nonconforming multiscale finite element method (Ms- FEM) introduced in 17, 14 for second order elliptic equations with highly oscillatory coefficients. The main difficulty in MsFEM, as well as other numerical upscaling methods, is the scale resonance effect. It has been show that the leading order resonance error can be effectively removed by using an over-sampling technique. Nonetheless, there is still a secondary cell resonance error of O(ะ„^2/h^2). Here, we introduce a Petrov-Galerkin MsFEM formulation with nonconforming multiscale trial functions and linear test functions. We show that the cell resonance error is eliminated in this formulation and hence the convergence rate is greatly improved. Moreover, we show that a similar formulation can be used to enhance the convergence of an immersed-interface finite element method for elliptic interface problems

    DSSY ๋น„์ˆœ์‘์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ์™€ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์šฉ

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ(๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)--์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› :์ž์—ฐ๊ณผํ•™๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ˆ˜๋ฆฌ๊ณผํ•™๋ถ€,2020. 2. ์‹ ๋™์šฐ.We first consider nonparametric DSSY nonconforming quadrilateral element introduced. The element satisfies the mean value property on each edge and shows optimal convergence for second-order elliptic problems. We estimate the effect of numerical integration on finite element method and construct new quadrature formula for DSSY element. It is shown that only three nodes are enough to get optimal convergence for second-order elliptic problems. Numerical results are presented to compare new quadrature formula with usual Gaussian quadrature rules. Next we study the nonconforming generalized multiscale finite element method(GMsFEM). The framework of GMsFEM is organized and every process of constructing nonconforming GMsFE spaces is presented in detail. GMsFE spaces consist of two ingredient. First one is the offline function space, a spectral decomposition of the snapshot space which is used to approximate the solution. Other one is the moment function space, which is used to impose continuity between local offline function spaces. Numerical results are presented based on nonparametric DSSY nonconforming element. In last chapter, an algebraic multiscale finite element method is investigated. Suppose that the coefficient and the source term of second-order elliptic problems are not available, and we only know the microscale linear system. We try to construct macroscale linear systems only using the algebraic information on the components of microscale systems. One-dimensional case is examined in detail following GMsFEM framework, and two dimensional case is also presented using the DSSY nonconforming finite element space.๋ณธ ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ ์‚ฌ๊ฐํ˜•์—์„œ ์ •์˜๋˜๋Š” ๋น„๋ชจ์ˆ˜์  DSSY ๋น„์ˆœ์‘์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•œ๋‹ค. 1์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ด์ฐจ ํƒ€์›ํ˜• ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ•ด๊ฒฐํ•  ๋•Œ ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ ๋ถ„๋ฒ•์ด ํ•ด์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ด์†๋„์— ์ž‘์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ด ์†๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณ€ํ™”์‹œํ‚ค์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ˆ˜์น˜ ์ ๋ถ„๋ฒ•์˜ ์ถฉ๋ถ„ ์กฐ๊ฑด์„ ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ , ์ด๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•ด DSSY ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ์— ์ ํ•ฉํ•œ ์ƒˆ๋กœ์šด ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฒ• ๊ณต์‹์„ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ 3๊ฐœ์˜ ์ ๋งŒ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•ด ์ตœ์ ์˜ ์ˆ˜๋ ด ์†๋„๋ฅผ ์–ป์„ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์Œ์„ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. 2์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋น„๋ชจ์ˆ˜์  DSSY ๋น„์ˆœ์‘์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๋œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋น„์ˆœ์‘์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๋œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๊ณต๊ฐ„์€ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ณต๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ฒซ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” offline ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ณต๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตญ์†Œ์  ์กฐํ™” ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ํ’€์–ด ์–ป์–ด์ง€๋Š” snapshot ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ณต๊ฐ„์— ์ŠคํŽ™ํŠธ๋Ÿผ ๋ถ„ํ•ด๋ฅผ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์–ด์ง„๋‹ค. ๋‘ ๋ฒˆ์งธ๋Š” moment ํ•จ์ˆ˜๊ณต๊ฐ„์œผ๋กœ ๊ตญ์†Œ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์–ป์–ด์ง„ offline ํ•จ์ˆ˜๋“ค ๊ฐ„์˜ ์—ฐ์†์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ€์—ฌํ•˜๋Š” ๋ฐ ์ด์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋…ผ์˜์™€ ํ•จ๊ป˜ 1์žฅ์—์„œ ๊ณ ์•ˆํ•œ ๊ตฌ์ ๋ฒ• ๊ณต์‹์„ ์ ์šฉํ•œ ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ์ œ์‹œํ•œ๋‹ค. 3์žฅ์—์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์  ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์†Œ๊ฐœํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ด์ฐจ ํƒ€์›ํ˜• ๋ฌธ์ œ์˜ ๊ณ„์ˆ˜์™€ ์†Œ์Šค ํ•ญ์„ ๋ชจ๋ฅด๋Š” ์ƒํƒœ์—์„œ ๋‹จ์ง€ ๋ฏธ์‹œ์  ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ ์„ ํ˜• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ๋งŒ ์•Œ๊ณ  ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ, ์ด ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์˜ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ ์„ฑ๋ถ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๋Œ€์ˆ˜์  ์ •๋ณด๋งŒ์„ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ฑฐ์‹œ์  ์Šค์ผ€์ผ์˜ ์„ ํ˜• ์‹œ์Šคํ…œ์„ ๊ฑด์„คํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋จผ์ € ์ผ์ฐจ์› ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด์ฐจ์› ๋ฌธ์ œ๋ฅผ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”๋œ ๋ฉ€ํ‹ฐ์Šค์ผ€์ผ ๋น„์ˆœ์‘์œ ํ•œ์š”์†Œ๋ฒ•์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์น˜์  ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋“ค์„ ๋ณด์—ฌ์ค€๋‹ค.Chapter 1. Nonparametric DSSY Nonconforming Quadrilateral Element 1 1.1 Introduction 1 1.2 Quadrilateral nonconforming elements 2 1.2.1 The Rannacher-Turek element and the DSSY element 3 1.2.2 Nonparametric DSSY quadrilateral element 4 1.3 A new intermediate space Kห‰\bar{K} for nonparametric DSSY element 9 1.3.1 The Meng et al. approach 9 1.3.2 A class of nonparametric DSSY elements on Kห‰\bar{K} 12 1.4 Construction of quadrature formula 17 1.4.1 Effect of numerical integration on FEM 17 1.4.2 Quadrature formula on Kห‰\bar{K} 28 1.5 Numerical results 32 Chapter 2 Nonconforming Generalized Multiscale Finite Element Method 39 2.1 Introduction 39 2.2 Framework of nonconforming generalized multiscale finite element methods 40 2.2.1 Preliminaries 40 2.2.2 Framework of nonconforming GMsFEM 42 2.3 Construction of multiscale finite element spaces 43 2.3.1 Snapshot function space VsnapV^{\text{snap}} 44 2.3.2 Offline function space VoffV^{\text{off}} 45 2.3.3 Moment function space MH\mathcal{M}_H 46 2.3.4 Nonconforming GMsFE spaces VHV^H and VH,0V^{H,0} 48 2.4 Error analysis 50 2.5 Numerical results 52 Chapter 3 Algebraic Multiscale Method 57 3.1 Introduction 57 3.2 Preliminaries 59 3.3 Algebraic Multiscale Method 64 3.3.1 Algebraic formulation of stiffness matrix 64 3.3.2 Multiscale solution 70 3.4 Error analysis 70 3.5 Numerical results 73 3.5.1 Known Coefficient Case 73 3.5.2 Random Coefficient Case 75 3.6 2D case 82 3.6.1 Implementation of the DSSY nonconforming element 83 3.6.2 Construction of multiscale finite element spaces 89 3.6.3 Numerical results 92 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋ก 103Docto

    Expanded mixed multiscale finite element methods and their applications for flows in porous media

    Get PDF
    We develop a family of expanded mixed Multiscale Finite Element Methods (MsFEMs) and their hybridizations for second-order elliptic equations. This formulation expands the standard mixed Multiscale Finite Element formulation in the sense that four unknowns (hybrid formulation) are solved simultaneously: pressure, gradient of pressure, velocity and Lagrange multipliers. We use multiscale basis functions for the both velocity and gradient of pressure. In the expanded mixed MsFEM framework, we consider both cases of separable-scale and non-separable spatial scales. We specifically analyze the methods in three categories: periodic separable scales, GG- convergence separable scales, and continuum scales. When there is no scale separation, using some global information can improve accuracy for the expanded mixed MsFEMs. We present rigorous convergence analysis for expanded mixed MsFEMs. The analysis includes both conforming and nonconforming expanded mixed MsFEM. Numerical results are presented for various multiscale models and flows in porous media with shales to illustrate the efficiency of the expanded mixed MsFEMs.Comment: 33 page
    • โ€ฆ
    corecore