41,272 research outputs found
Oracles and query lower bounds in generalised probabilistic theories
We investigate the connection between interference and computational power
within the operationally defined framework of generalised probabilistic
theories. To compare the computational abilities of different theories within
this framework we show that any theory satisfying three natural physical
principles possess a well-defined oracle model. Indeed, we prove a subroutine
theorem for oracles in such theories which is a necessary condition for the
oracle to be well-defined. The three principles are: causality (roughly, no
signalling from the future), purification (each mixed state arises as the
marginal of a pure state of a larger system), and strong symmetry existence of
non-trivial reversible transformations). Sorkin has defined a hierarchy of
conceivable interference behaviours, where the order in the hierarchy
corresponds to the number of paths that have an irreducible interaction in a
multi-slit experiment. Given our oracle model, we show that if a classical
computer requires at least n queries to solve a learning problem, then the
corresponding lower bound in theories lying at the kth level of Sorkin's
hierarchy is n/k. Hence, lower bounds on the number of queries to a quantum
oracle needed to solve certain problems are not optimal in the space of all
generalised probabilistic theories, although it is not yet known whether the
optimal bounds are achievable in general. Hence searches for higher-order
interference are not only foundationally motivated, but constitute a search for
a computational resource beyond that offered by quantum computation.Comment: 17+7 pages. Comments Welcome. Published in special issue
"Foundational Aspects of Quantum Information" in Foundations of Physic
Deriving Grover's lower bound from simple physical principles
Grover's algorithm constitutes the optimal quantum solution to the search
problem and provides a quadratic speed-up over all possible classical search
algorithms. Quantum interference between computational paths has been posited
as a key resource behind this computational speed-up. However there is a limit
to this interference, at most pairs of paths can ever interact in a fundamental
way. Could more interference imply more computational power? Sorkin has defined
a hierarchy of possible interference behaviours---currently under experimental
investigation---where classical theory is at the first level of the hierarchy
and quantum theory belongs to the second. Informally, the order in the
hierarchy corresponds to the number of paths that have an irreducible
interaction in a multi-slit experiment. In this work, we consider how Grover's
speed-up depends on the order of interference in a theory. Surprisingly, we
show that the quadratic lower bound holds regardless of the order of
interference. Thus, at least from the point of view of the search problem,
post-quantum interference does not imply a computational speed-up over quantum
theory.Comment: Updated title and exposition in response to referee comments. 6+2
pages, 5 figure
How to understand the cell by breaking it: network analysis of gene perturbation screens
Modern high-throughput gene perturbation screens are key technologies at the
forefront of genetic research. Combined with rich phenotypic descriptors they
enable researchers to observe detailed cellular reactions to experimental
perturbations on a genome-wide scale. This review surveys the current
state-of-the-art in analyzing perturbation screens from a network point of
view. We describe approaches to make the step from the parts list to the wiring
diagram by using phenotypes for network inference and integrating them with
complementary data sources. The first part of the review describes methods to
analyze one- or low-dimensional phenotypes like viability or reporter activity;
the second part concentrates on high-dimensional phenotypes showing global
changes in cell morphology, transcriptome or proteome.Comment: Review based on ISMB 2009 tutorial; after two rounds of revisio
Higher-order interference in extensions of quantum theory
Quantum interference lies at the heart of several quantum computational
speed-ups and provides a striking example of a phenomenon with no classical
counterpart. An intriguing feature of quantum interference arises in a three
slit experiment. In this set-up, the interference pattern can be written in
terms of the two and one slit patterns obtained by blocking some of the slits.
This is in stark contrast with the standard two slit experiment, where the
interference pattern is irreducible. This was first noted by Rafael Sorkin, who
asked why quantum theory only exhibits irreducible interference in the two slit
experiment. One approach to this problem is to compare the predictions of
quantum theory to those of operationally-defined `foil' theories, in the hope
of determining whether theories exhibiting higher-order interference suffer
from pathological--or at least undesirable--features. In this paper two
proposed extensions of quantum theory are considered: the theory of Density
Cubes proposed by Dakic et al., which has been shown to exhibit irreducible
interference in the three slit set-up, and the Quartic Quantum Theory of
Zyczkowski. The theory of Density Cubes will be shown to provide an advantage
over quantum theory in a certain computational task and to posses a
well-defined mechanism which leads to the emergence of quantum theory. Despite
this, the axioms used to define Density Cubes will be shown to be insufficient
to uniquely characterise the theory. In comparison, Quartic Quantum Theory is
well-defined and we show that it exhibits irreducible interference to all
orders. This feature of the theory is argued not to be a genuine phenomenon,
but to arise from an ambiguity in the current definition of higher-order
interference. To understand why quantum theory has limited interference
therefore, a new operational definition of higher-order interference is needed.Comment: Updated in response to referee comments. 17 pages. Comments welcom
Towards a Quantum-Like Cognitive Architecture for Decision-Making
We propose an alternative and unifying framework for decision-making that, by
using quantum mechanics, provides more generalised cognitive and decision
models with the ability to represent more information than classical models.
This framework can accommodate and predict several cognitive biases reported in
Lieder & Griffiths without heavy reliance on heuristics nor on assumptions of
the computational resources of the mind
- …