1,618 research outputs found
The dagger lambda calculus
We present a novel lambda calculus that casts the categorical approach to the
study of quantum protocols into the rich and well established tradition of type
theory. Our construction extends the linear typed lambda calculus with a linear
negation of "trivialised" De Morgan duality. Reduction is realised through
explicit substitution, based on a symmetric notion of binding of global scope,
with rules acting on the entire typing judgement instead of on a specific
subterm. Proofs of subject reduction, confluence, strong normalisation and
consistency are provided, and the language is shown to be an internal language
for dagger compact categories.Comment: In Proceedings QPL 2014, arXiv:1412.810
Correspondences between Classical, Intuitionistic and Uniform Provability
Based on an analysis of the inference rules used, we provide a
characterization of the situations in which classical provability entails
intuitionistic provability. We then examine the relationship of these
derivability notions to uniform provability, a restriction of intuitionistic
provability that embodies a special form of goal-directedness. We determine,
first, the circumstances in which the former relations imply the latter. Using
this result, we identify the richest versions of the so-called abstract logic
programming languages in classical and intuitionistic logic. We then study the
reduction of classical and, derivatively, intuitionistic provability to uniform
provability via the addition to the assumption set of the negation of the
formula to be proved. Our focus here is on understanding the situations in
which this reduction is achieved. However, our discussions indicate the
structure of a proof procedure based on the reduction, a matter also considered
explicitly elsewhere.Comment: 31 page
On Nested Sequents for Constructive Modal Logics
We present deductive systems for various modal logics that can be obtained
from the constructive variant of the normal modal logic CK by adding
combinations of the axioms d, t, b, 4, and 5. This includes the constructive
variants of the standard modal logics K4, S4, and S5. We use for our
presentation the formalism of nested sequents and give a syntactic proof of cut
elimination.Comment: 33 page
Syntactic Interpolation for Tense Logics and Bi-Intuitionistic Logic via Nested Sequents
We provide a direct method for proving Craig interpolation for a range of modal and intuitionistic logics, including those containing a "converse" modality. We demonstrate this method for classical tense logic, its extensions with path axioms, and for bi-intuitionistic logic. These logics do not have straightforward formalisations in the traditional Gentzen-style sequent calculus, but have all been shown to have cut-free nested sequent calculi. The proof of the interpolation theorem uses these calculi and is purely syntactic, without resorting to embeddings, semantic arguments, or interpreted connectives external to the underlying logical language. A novel feature of our proof includes an orthogonality condition for defining duality between interpolants
What is a Paraconsistent Logic?
Paraconsistent logics are logical systems that reject the classical principle, usually dubbed Explosion, that a contradiction implies everything. However, the received view about paraconsistency focuses only the inferential version of Explosion, which is concerned with formulae, thereby overlooking other possible accounts. In this paper, we propose to focus, additionally, on a meta-inferential version of Explosion, i.e. which is concerned with inferences or sequents. In doing so, we will offer a new characterization of paraconsistency by means of which a logic is paraconsistent if it invalidates either the inferential or the meta-inferential notion of Explosion. We show the non-triviality of this criterion by discussing a number of logics. On the one hand, logics which validate and invalidate both versions of Explosion, such as classical logic and AsenjoâPriestâs 3-valued logic LP. On the other hand, logics which validate one version of Explosion but not the other, such as the substructural logics TS and ST, introduced by Malinowski and Cobreros, EgrĂŠ, Ripley and van Rooij, which are obtained via Malinowskiâs and Frankowskiâs q- and p-matrices, respectively
Focusing and Polarization in Intuitionistic Logic
A focused proof system provides a normal form to cut-free proofs that
structures the application of invertible and non-invertible inference rules.
The focused proof system of Andreoli for linear logic has been applied to both
the proof search and the proof normalization approaches to computation. Various
proof systems in literature exhibit characteristics of focusing to one degree
or another. We present a new, focused proof system for intuitionistic logic,
called LJF, and show how other proof systems can be mapped into the new system
by inserting logical connectives that prematurely stop focusing. We also use
LJF to design a focused proof system for classical logic. Our approach to the
design and analysis of these systems is based on the completeness of focusing
in linear logic and on the notion of polarity that appears in Girard's LC and
LU proof systems
Reasoning about Knowledge in Linear Logic: Modalities and Complexity
In a recent paper, Jean-Yves Girard commented that âit has been a long time since philosophy has stopped intereacting with logicâ[17]. Actually, it has no
- âŚ