Comparison of Two Self-organization and Hierarchical Routing Protocols for Ad Hoc Networks

International audienceIn this article, we compare two self-organization and hierarchical routing protocols for ad hoc networks. These two protocols apply the reverse approach from the classical one, since they use a reactive routing protocol inside the clusters and a proactive routing protocol between the clusters. We compare them regarding the cluster organization they provide and the routing that is then performed over it. This study gives an idea of the impact of the use of recursiveness and of the partition of the DHT on self-organization and hierarchical routing in ad hoc networks

Формирование динамической инфраструктуры крупномасштабных мобильных сетей

A method of forming a distributed domains, the best in terms of minimum time routing. A justified and choosing a domain controller on the basis of density network environment.Предложен способ распределенного формирования доменов, оптимальных с точки зрения минимального времени маршрутизации. Предложен и обоснован выбор контролера домена на основе критерия плотности сетевого окружения