A comparative study using an autostereoscopic display with augmented and virtual reality

Advances in display devices are facilitating the integration of stereoscopic visualization in our daily lives. However, autostereoscopic visualization has not been extensively exploited. In this paper, we present a system that combines Augmented Reality (AR) and autostereoscopic visualization. We also present the first study that compares different aspects using an autostereoscopic display with AR and VR, in which 39 children from 8 to 10 years old participated. In our study, no statistically significant differences were found between AR and VR. However, the scores were very high in nearly all of the questions, and the children also scored the AR version higher in all cases. Moreover, the children explicitly preferred the AR version (81%). For the AR version, a strong and significant correlation was found between the use of the autostereoscopic screen in games and seeing the virtual object on the marker. For the VR version, two strong and significant correlations were found. The first correlation was between the ease of play and the use of the rotatory controller. The second correlation was between depth perception and the game global score. Therefore, the combinations of AR and VR with autostereoscopic visualization are possibilities for developing edutainment systems for childrenThis work was funded by the Spanish APRENDRA project (TIN2009-14319-C02). We would like to thank the following for their contributions: AIJU, the "Escola d'Estiu" and especially Ignacio Segui, Juan Cano, Miguelon Gimenez, and Javier Irimia. This work would not have been possible without their collaboration. The ALF3D project (TIN2009-14103-03) for the autostereoscopic display. Roberto Vivo, Rafa Gaitan, Severino Gonzalez, and M. Jose Vicent, for their help. The children's parents who signed the agreement to allow their children to participate in the study. The children who participated in the study. The ETSInf for letting us use its facilities during the testing phase.Arino, J.; Juan Lizandra, MC.; Gil Gómez, JA.; Mollá Vayá, RP. (2014). A comparative study using an autostereoscopic display with augmented and virtual reality. Behaviour and Information Technology. 33(6):646-655. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.815277S646655336Azuma, R. T. (1997). A Survey of Augmented Reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385. doi:10.1162/pres.1997.6.4.355Blum, T.et al. 2012. Mirracle: augmented reality in-situ visualization of human anatomy using a magic mirror.In: IEEE virtual reality workshops, 4–8 March 2012, Costa Mesa, CA, USA. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 169–170.Botden, S. M. B. I., Buzink, S. N., Schijven, M. P., & Jakimowicz, J. J. (2007). Augmented versus Virtual Reality Laparoscopic Simulation: What Is the Difference? World Journal of Surgery, 31(4), 764-772. doi:10.1007/s00268-006-0724-yChittaro, L., & Ranon, R. (2007). Web3D technologies in learning, education and training: Motivations, issues, opportunities. Computers & Education, 49(1), 3-18. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2005.06.002Dodgson, N. A. (2005). Autostereoscopic 3D displays. Computer, 38(8), 31-36. doi:10.1109/mc.2005.252Ehara, J., & Saito, H. (2006). Texture overlay for virtual clothing based on PCA of silhouettes. 2006 IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality. doi:10.1109/ismar.2006.297805Eisert, P., Fechteler, P., & Rurainsky, J. (2008). 3-D Tracking of shoes for Virtual Mirror applications. 2008 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. doi:10.1109/cvpr.2008.4587566Fiala, M. (2007). Magic Mirror System with Hand-held and Wearable Augmentations. 2007 IEEE Virtual Reality Conference. doi:10.1109/vr.2007.352493Froner, B., Holliman, N. S., & Liversedge, S. P. (2008). A comparative study of fine depth perception on two-view 3D displays. Displays, 29(5), 440-450. doi:10.1016/j.displa.2008.03.001Holliman, N. S., Dodgson, N. A., Favalora, G. E., & Pockett, L. (2011). Three-Dimensional Displays: A Review and Applications Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, 57(2), 362-371. doi:10.1109/tbc.2011.2130930Ilgner, J. F. R., Kawai, T., Shibata, T., Yamazoe, T., & Westhofen, M. (2006). Evaluation of stereoscopic medical video content on an autostereoscopic display for undergraduate medical education. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems XIII. doi:10.1117/12.647591Jeong, J.-S., Park, C., Kim, M., Oh, W.-K., & Yoo, K.-H. (2011). Development of a 3D Virtual Laboratory with Motion Sensor for Physics Education. Ubiquitous Computing and Multimedia Applications, 253-262. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-20975-8_28Jones, J. A., Swan, J. E., Singh, G., Kolstad, E., & Ellis, S. R. (2008). The effects of virtual reality, augmented reality, and motion parallax on egocentric depth perception. Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization - APGV ’08. doi:10.1145/1394281.1394283Juan, M. C., & Pérez, D. (2010). Using augmented and virtual reality for the development of acrophobic scenarios. Comparison of the levels of presence and anxiety. Computers & Graphics, 34(6), 756-766. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2010.08.001Kaufmann, H., & Csisinko, M. (2011). Wireless Displays in Educational Augmented Reality Applications. Handbook of Augmented Reality, 157-175. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-0064-6_6Kaufmann, H., & Meyer, B. (2008). Simulating educational physical experiments in augmented reality. ACM SIGGRAPH ASIA 2008 educators programme on - SIGGRAPH Asia ’08. doi:10.1145/1507713.1507717Konrad, J. (2011). 3D Displays. Optical and Digital Image Processing, 369-395. doi:10.1002/9783527635245.ch17Konrad, J., & Halle, M. (2007). 3-D Displays and Signal Processing. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 24(6), 97-111. doi:10.1109/msp.2007.905706Kwon, H., & Choi, H.-J. (2012). A time-sequential mutli-view autostereoscopic display without resolution loss using a multi-directional backlight unit and an LCD panel. Stereoscopic Displays and Applications XXIII. doi:10.1117/12.907793Livingston, M. A., Zanbaka, C., Swan, J. E., & Smallman, H. S. (s. f.). Objective measures for the effectiveness of augmented reality. IEEE Proceedings. VR 2005. Virtual Reality, 2005. doi:10.1109/vr.2005.1492798Monahan, T., McArdle, G., & Bertolotto, M. (2008). Virtual reality for collaborative e-learning. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1339-1353. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.12.008Montgomery, D. J., Woodgate, G. J., Jacobs, A. M. S., Harrold, J., & Ezra, D. (2001). Performance of a flat-panel display system convertible between 2D and autostereoscopic 3D modes. Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VIII. doi:10.1117/12.430813Morphew, M. E., Shively, J. R., & Casey, D. (2004). Helmet-mounted displays for unmanned aerial vehicle control. Helmet- and Head-Mounted Displays IX: Technologies and Applications. doi:10.1117/12.541031Pan, Z., Cheok, A. D., Yang, H., Zhu, J., & Shi, J. (2006). Virtual reality and mixed reality for virtual learning environments. Computers & Graphics, 30(1), 20-28. doi:10.1016/j.cag.2005.10.004Petkov, E. G. (2010). Educational Virtual Reality through a Multiview Autostereoscopic 3D Display. Innovations in Computing Sciences and Software Engineering, 505-508. doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9112-3_86Shen, Y., Ong, S. K., & Nee, A. Y. C. (2011). Vision-Based Hand Interaction in Augmented Reality Environment. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(6), 523-544. doi:10.1080/10447318.2011.555297Swan, J. E., Jones, A., Kolstad, E., Livingston, M. A., & Smallman, H. S. (2007). Egocentric depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(3), 429-442. doi:10.1109/tvcg.2007.1035Urey, H., Chellappan, K. V., Erden, E., & Surman, P. (2011). State of the Art in Stereoscopic and Autostereoscopic Displays. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(4), 540-555. doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2098351Zhang, Y., Ji, Q., and Zhang, W., 2010. Multi-view autostereoscopic 3D display.In: International conference on optics photonics and energy engineering, 10–11 May 2010, Wuhan, China. Washington, DC: IEEE Computer Society, 58–61

Comparative study of AR versus video tutorials for minor maintenance operations

[EN] Augmented Reality (AR) has become a mainstream technology in the development of solutions for repair and maintenance operations. Although most of the AR solutions are still limited to specific contexts in industry, some consumer electronics companies have started to offer pre-packaged AR solutions as alternative to video-based tutorials (VT) for minor maintenance operations. In this paper, we present a comparative study of the acquired knowledge and user perception achieved with AR and VT solutions in some maintenance tasks of IT equipment. The results indicate that both systems help users to acquire knowledge in various aspects of equipment maintenance. Although no statistically significant differences were found between AR and VT solutions, users scored higher on the AR version in all cases. Moreover, the users explicitly preferred the AR version when evaluating three different usability and satisfaction criteria. For the AR version, a strong and significant correlation was found between the satisfaction and the achieved knowledge. Since the AR solution achieved similar learning results with higher usability scores than the video-based tutorials, these results suggest that AR solutions are the most effective approach to substitute the typical paper-based instructions in consumer electronics.This work has been supported by Spanish MINECO and EU ERDF programs under grant RTI2018-098156-B-C55.Morillo, P.; García García, I.; Orduña, JM.; Fernández, M.; Juan, M. (2020). Comparative study of AR versus video tutorials for minor maintenance operations. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 79(11-12):7073-7100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11042-019-08437-9S707371007911-12Ahn J, Williamson J, Gartrell M, Han R, Lv Q, Mishra S (2015) Supporting healthy grocery shopping via mobile augmented reality. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl 12(1s):16:1–16:24. https://doi.org/10.1145/2808207Anderson TW (2011) Anderson–darling tests of goodness-of-fit. Springer, Berlin, pp 52–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-04898-2_118Awad N, Lewandowski SE, Decker EW (2015) Event management system for facilitating user interactions at a venue. US Patent App. 14/829,382Azuma R (1997) A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 6(4):355–385Baird K, Barfield W (1999) Evaluating the effectiveness of augmented reality displays for a manual assembly task. Virtual Reality 4:250–259Ballo P (2018) Hardware and software for ar/vr development. In: Augmented and virtual reality in libraries, pp 45–55. LITA guidesBarrile V, Fotia A, Bilotta G (2018) Geomatics and augmented reality experiments for the cultural heritage. Applied Geomatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0231-5Billinghurst M, Duenser A (2012) Augmented reality in the classroom. Computer 45(7):56–63. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2012.111Bowman DA, McMahan RP (2007) Virtual reality: how much immersion is enough? Computer 40(7)Brown TA (2015) Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. Guilford PublicationsDodge Y. (ed) (2008) Kruskal-Wallis test. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-32833-1_216Elmunsyah H, Hidayat WN, Asfani K (2019) Interactive learning media innovation: utilization of augmented reality and pop-up book to improve user’s learning autonomy. J Phys Conf Ser 1193(012):031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1193/1/012031Entertainment L (2017) Dolphin Player. https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.broov.player. Online; Accessed 09-September-2017Fletcher J, Belanich J, Moses F, Fehr A, Moss J (2017) Effectiveness of augmented reality & augmented virtuality. In: MODSIM Modeling & simulation of systems and applications) world conferenceFraga-Lamas P, Fernández-Caramés TM, Blanco-Novoa O, Vilar-Montesinos MA (2018) A review on industrial augmented reality systems for the industry 4.0 shipyard. IEEE Access 6:13,358–13,375. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808326Furió D, Juan MC, Seguí I, Vivó R (2015) Mobile learning vs. traditional classroom lessons: a comparative study. J Comput Assist Learn 31(3):189–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12071Gavish N, Gutiérrez T, Webel S, Rodríguez J, Peveri M, Bockholt U, Tecchia F (2015) Evaluating virtual reality and augmented reality training for industrial maintenance and assembly tasks. Interact Learn Environ 23(6):778–798. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2013.815221Gimeno J, Morillo P, Orduña JM, Fernández M (2013) A new ar authoring tool using depth maps for industrial procedures. Comput Ind 64(9):1263–1271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2013.06.012Holzinger A, Kickmeier-Rust MD, Albert D (2008) Dynamic media in computer science education; content complexity and learning performance: is less more? Educational Technology & Society 11(1):279–290Hornbaek K (2013) Some whys and hows of experiments in human–computer interaction. Foundations and TrendsⓇ in Human–Computer Interaction 5(4):299–373. https://doi.org/10.1561/1100000043Huang J, Liu S, Xing J, Mei T, Yan S (2014) Circle & search: Attribute-aware shoe retrieval. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl 11 (1):3:1–3:21. https://doi.org/10.1145/2632165Jiang S, Wu Y, Fu Y (2018) Deep bidirectional cross-triplet embedding for online clothing shopping. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Appl 14(1):5:1–5:22. https://doi.org/10.1145/3152114Kim SK, Kang SJ, Choi YJ, Choi MH, Hong M (2017) Augmented-reality survey: from concept to application. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems 11:982–1004. https://doi.org/10.3837/tiis.2017.02.019Langlotz T, Zingerle M, Grasset R, Kaufmann H, Reitmayr G (2012) Ar record&replay: Situated compositing of video content in mobile augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 24th Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference, OzCHI ’12. ACM, New York, pp 318–326, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2414536.2414588, (to appear in print)Martin-SanJose JF, Juan MC, Mollá R, Vivó R (2017) Advanced displays and natural user interfaces to support learning. Interact Learn Environ 25(1):17–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2015.1090455Massey FJ (1951) The kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J Am Stat Assoc 46(253):68–78van der Meij H, van der Meij J, Voerman T, Duipmans E (2018) Supporting motivation, task performance and retention in video tutorials for software training. Educ Technol Res Dev 66(3):597–614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9560-zvan der Meij J, van der Meij H (2015) A test of the design of a video tutorial for software training. J Comput Assist Learn 31 (2):116–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12082Mestre LS (2012) Student preference for tutorial design: a usability study. Ref Serv Rev 40(2):258–276. https://doi.org/10.1108/00907321211228318Mohr P, Kerbl B, Donoser M, Schmalstieg D, Kalkofen D (2015) Retargeting technical documentation to augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’15. ACM, New York, pp 3337–3346, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702490, (to appear in print)Mohr P, Mandl D, Tatzgern M, Veas E, Schmalstieg D, Kalkofen D (2017) Retargeting video tutorials showing tools with surface contact to augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’17. ACM, New York, pp 6547–6558, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025688, (to appear in print)Montgomery DC, Runger GC (2003) Applied statistics and probability for engineers. Wiley, New YorkMorillo P, Orduña JM, Casas S, Fernández M (2019) A comparison study of ar applications versus pseudo-holographic systems as virtual exhibitors for luxury watch retail stores. Multimedia Systems. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00530-019-00606-yMorse JM (2000) Determining sample size. Qual Health Res 10(1):3–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/104973200129118183Muñoz-Montoya F, Juan M, Mendez-Lopez M, Fidalgo C (2019) Augmented reality based on slam to assess spatial short-term memory. IEEE Access 7:2453–2466. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2886627Neuhäuser M (2011) Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test. Springer, Berlin, pp 1656–1658Neumann U, Majoros A (1998) Cognitive, performance, and systems issues for augmented reality applications in manufacturing and maintenance. In: Inproceedings of the IEEE virtual reality annual international symposium (VR ’98), pp 4–11no JJA, Juan MC, Gil-Gómez JA, Mollá R. (2014) A comparative study using an autostereoscopic display with augmented and virtual reality. Behaviour & Information Technology 33(6):646–655. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2013.815277Palmarini R, Erkoyuncu JA, Roy R, Torabmostaedi H (2018) A systematic review of augmented reality applications in maintenance. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 49:215–228Quint F, Loch F (2015) Using smart glasses to document maintenance processes. Mensch und Computer 2015–WorkshopbandRadkowski R, Herrema J, Oliver J (2015) Augmented reality-based manual assembly support with visual features for different degrees of difficulty. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 31(5):337–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2014.994194Regenbrecht H, Schubert T (2002) Measuring presence in augmented reality environments: design and a first test of a questionnaire, Porto, PortugalRobertson J (2012) Likert-type scales, statistical methods, and effect sizes. Commun ACM 55(5):6–7. https://doi.org/10.1145/2160718.2160721Rodríguez-Andrés D, Juan MC, Méndez-López M, Pérez-Hernández E, Lluch J (2016) Mnemocity task: Assessment of childrens spatial memory using stereoscopy and virtual environments. PLos ONE 1(8). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0161858Sanna A, Manuri F, Lamberti F, Paravati G, Pezzolla P (2015) Using handheld devices to support augmented reality-based maintenance and assembly tasks. In: 2015 IEEE International conference on consumer electronics (ICCE), pp. 178–179. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCE.2015.7066370Schmidt S, Ehrenbrink P, Weiss B, Voigt-Antons J, Kojic T, Johnston A, Moller S (2018) Impact of virtual environments on motivation and engagement during exergames. In: 2018 Tenth international conference on quality of multimedia experience (qoMEX), pp 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1109/QoMEX.2018.8463389Shapiro SS, Wilk MB (1965) An analysis of variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52(3/4):591–611Tang A, Owen C, Biocca F, Mou W (2003) Comparative effectiveness of augmented reality in object assembly. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, CHI ’03. ACM, New York, pp 73–80, DOI https://doi.org/10.1145/642611.642626, (to appear in print)Tomás JM, Oliver A, Galiana L, Sancho P, Lila M (2013) Explaining method effects associated with negatively worded items in trait and state global and domain-specific self-esteem scales. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 20(2):299–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2013.769394Uva AE, Gattullo M, Manghisi VM, Spagnulo D, Cascella GL, Fiorentino M (2017) Evaluating the effectiveness of spatial augmented reality in smart manufacturing: a solution for manual working stations. The Int J Adv Manuf Technol: 1–13Wang X, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2016) A comprehensive survey of augmented reality assembly research. Advances in Manufacturing 4(1):1–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-015-0131-4Westerfield G, Mitrovic A, Billinghurst M (2015) Intelligent augmented reality training for motherboard assembly. Int J Artif Intell Educ 25(1):157–172. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-014-0032-xWiedenmaier S, Oehme O, Schmidt L, Luczak H (2003) Augmented reality (ar) for assembly processes - design and experimental evaluation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 16(3):497–514Witmer BG, Singer MJ (1998) Measuring presence in virtual environments: a presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 7(3):225–240Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC (2013) Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education 62:41–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2012.10.024Yim MYC, Chu SC, Sauer PL (2017) Is augmented reality technology an effective tool for e-commerce? an interactivity and vividness perspective. Journal of Interactive Marketing 39(http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1094996817300336):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2017.04.001Yuan ML, Ong SK, Nee AYC (2008) Augmented reality for assembly guidance using a virtual interactive tool. Int J Prod Res 46(7):1745–1767. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020754060097293

Perceiving Mass in Mixed Reality through Pseudo-Haptic Rendering of Newton's Third Law

In mixed reality, real objects can be used to interact with virtual objects. However, unlike in the real world, real objects do not encounter any opposite reaction force when pushing against virtual objects. The lack of reaction force during manipulation prevents users from perceiving the mass of virtual objects. Although this could be addressed by equipping real objects with force-feedback devices, such a solution remains complex and impractical.In this work, we present a technique to produce an illusion of mass without any active force-feedback mechanism. This is achieved by simulating the effects of this reaction force in a purely visual way. A first study demonstrates that our technique indeed allows users to differentiate light virtual objects from heavy virtual objects. In addition, it shows that the illusion is immediately effective, with no prior training. In a second study, we measure the lowest mass difference (JND) that can be perceived with this technique. The effectiveness and ease of implementation of our solution provides an opportunity to enhance mixed reality interaction at no additional cost

Augmented Reality-based Feedback for Technician-in-the-loop C-arm Repositioning

Interventional C-arm imaging is crucial to percutaneous orthopedic procedures as it enables the surgeon to monitor the progress of surgery on the anatomy level. Minimally invasive interventions require repeated acquisition of X-ray images from different anatomical views to verify tool placement. Achieving and reproducing these views often comes at the cost of increased surgical time and radiation dose to both patient and staff. This work proposes a marker-free "technician-in-the-loop" Augmented Reality (AR) solution for C-arm repositioning. The X-ray technician operating the C-arm interventionally is equipped with a head-mounted display capable of recording desired C-arm poses in 3D via an integrated infrared sensor. For C-arm repositioning to a particular target view, the recorded C-arm pose is restored as a virtual object and visualized in an AR environment, serving as a perceptual reference for the technician. We conduct experiments in a setting simulating orthopedic trauma surgery. Our proof-of-principle findings indicate that the proposed system can decrease the 2.76 X-ray images required per desired view down to zero, suggesting substantial reductions of radiation dose during C-arm repositioning. The proposed AR solution is a first step towards facilitating communication between the surgeon and the surgical staff, improving the quality of surgical image acquisition, and enabling context-aware guidance for surgery rooms of the future. The concept of technician-in-the-loop design will become relevant to various interventions considering the expected advancements of sensing and wearable computing in the near future

Occlusion Handling using Semantic Segmentation and Visibility-Based Rendering for Mixed Reality

Real-time occlusion handling is a major problem in outdoor mixed reality system because it requires great computational cost mainly due to the complexity of the scene. Using only segmentation, it is difficult to accurately render a virtual object occluded by complex objects such as trees, bushes etc. In this paper, we propose a novel occlusion handling method for real-time, outdoor, and omni-directional mixed reality system using only the information from a monocular image sequence. We first present a semantic segmentation scheme for predicting the amount of visibility for different type of objects in the scene. We also simultaneously calculate a foreground probability map using depth estimation derived from optical flow. Finally, we combine the segmentation result and the probability map to render the computer generated object and the real scene using a visibility-based rendering method. Our results show great improvement in handling occlusions compared to existing blending based methods