113,328 research outputs found
Comparing Community Structure to Characteristics in Online Collegiate Social Networks
We study the structure of social networks of students by examining the graphs
of Facebook "friendships" at five American universities at a single point in
time. We investigate each single-institution network's community structure and
employ graphical and quantitative tools, including standardized pair-counting
methods, to measure the correlations between the network communities and a set
of self-identified user characteristics (residence, class year, major, and high
school). We review the basic properties and statistics of the pair-counting
indices employed and recall, in simplified notation, a useful analytical
formula for the z-score of the Rand coefficient. Our study illustrates how to
examine different instances of social networks constructed in similar
environments, emphasizes the array of social forces that combine to form
"communities," and leads to comparative observations about online social lives
that can be used to infer comparisons about offline social structures. In our
illustration of this methodology, we calculate the relative contributions of
different characteristics to the community structure of individual universities
and subsequently compare these relative contributions at different
universities, measuring for example the importance of common high school
affiliation to large state universities and the varying degrees of influence
common major can have on the social structure at different universities. The
heterogeneity of communities that we observe indicates that these networks
typically have multiple organizing factors rather than a single dominant one.Comment: Version 3 (17 pages, 5 multi-part figures), accepted in SIAM Revie
Different approaches to community detection
A precise definition of what constitutes a community in networks has remained
elusive. Consequently, network scientists have compared community detection
algorithms on benchmark networks with a particular form of community structure
and classified them based on the mathematical techniques they employ. However,
this comparison can be misleading because apparent similarities in their
mathematical machinery can disguise different reasons for why we would want to
employ community detection in the first place. Here we provide a focused review
of these different motivations that underpin community detection. This
problem-driven classification is useful in applied network science, where it is
important to select an appropriate algorithm for the given purpose. Moreover,
highlighting the different approaches to community detection also delineates
the many lines of research and points out open directions and avenues for
future research.Comment: 14 pages, 2 figures. Written as a chapter for forthcoming Advances in
network clustering and blockmodeling, and based on an extended version of The
many facets of community detection in complex networks, Appl. Netw. Sci. 2: 4
(2017) by the same author
Defining and Evaluating Network Communities based on Ground-truth
Nodes in real-world networks organize into densely linked communities where
edges appear with high concentration among the members of the community.
Identifying such communities of nodes has proven to be a challenging task
mainly due to a plethora of definitions of a community, intractability of
algorithms, issues with evaluation and the lack of a reliable gold-standard
ground-truth.
In this paper we study a set of 230 large real-world social, collaboration
and information networks where nodes explicitly state their group memberships.
For example, in social networks nodes explicitly join various interest based
social groups. We use such groups to define a reliable and robust notion of
ground-truth communities. We then propose a methodology which allows us to
compare and quantitatively evaluate how different structural definitions of
network communities correspond to ground-truth communities. We choose 13
commonly used structural definitions of network communities and examine their
sensitivity, robustness and performance in identifying the ground-truth. We
show that the 13 structural definitions are heavily correlated and naturally
group into four classes. We find that two of these definitions, Conductance and
Triad-participation-ratio, consistently give the best performance in
identifying ground-truth communities. We also investigate a task of detecting
communities given a single seed node. We extend the local spectral clustering
algorithm into a heuristic parameter-free community detection method that
easily scales to networks with more than hundred million nodes. The proposed
method achieves 30% relative improvement over current local clustering methods.Comment: Proceedings of 2012 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining
(ICDM), 201
Comparative Evaluation of Community Detection Algorithms: A Topological Approach
Community detection is one of the most active fields in complex networks
analysis, due to its potential value in practical applications. Many works
inspired by different paradigms are devoted to the development of algorithmic
solutions allowing to reveal the network structure in such cohesive subgroups.
Comparative studies reported in the literature usually rely on a performance
measure considering the community structure as a partition (Rand Index,
Normalized Mutual information, etc.). However, this type of comparison neglects
the topological properties of the communities. In this article, we present a
comprehensive comparative study of a representative set of community detection
methods, in which we adopt both types of evaluation. Community-oriented
topological measures are used to qualify the communities and evaluate their
deviation from the reference structure. In order to mimic real-world systems,
we use artificially generated realistic networks. It turns out there is no
equivalence between both approaches: a high performance does not necessarily
correspond to correct topological properties, and vice-versa. They can
therefore be considered as complementary, and we recommend applying both of
them in order to perform a complete and accurate assessment
Detecting Community Structure in Dynamic Social Networks Using the Concept of Leadership
Detecting community structure in social networks is a fundamental problem
empowering us to identify groups of actors with similar interests. There have
been extensive works focusing on finding communities in static networks,
however, in reality, due to dynamic nature of social networks, they are
evolving continuously. Ignoring the dynamic aspect of social networks, neither
allows us to capture evolutionary behavior of the network nor to predict the
future status of individuals. Aside from being dynamic, another significant
characteristic of real-world social networks is the presence of leaders, i.e.
nodes with high degree centrality having a high attraction to absorb other
members and hence to form a local community. In this paper, we devised an
efficient method to incrementally detect communities in highly dynamic social
networks using the intuitive idea of importance and persistence of community
leaders over time. Our proposed method is able to find new communities based on
the previous structure of the network without recomputing them from scratch.
This unique feature, enables us to efficiently detect and track communities
over time rapidly. Experimental results on the synthetic and real-world social
networks demonstrate that our method is both effective and efficient in
discovering communities in dynamic social networks
- …