5 research outputs found
Committee-Based Profiles for Politician Finding
One step towards breaking down barriers between citizens and politicians is to help
people identify those politicians who share their concerns. This paper is set in the field
of expert finding and is based on the automatic construction of politicians’ profiles
from their speeches on parliamentary committees. These committee-based profiles are
treated as documents and are indexed by an information retrieval system. Given a query
representing a citizen’s concern, a profile ranking is then obtained. In the final step, the
different results for each candidate are combined in order to obtain the final politician
ranking. We explore the use of classic combination strategies for this purpose and present
a new approach that improves state-of-the-art performance and which is more stable
under different conditions. We also introduce a two-stage model where the identification
of a broader concept (such as the committee) is used to improve the final politician
ranking.This work has been funded by the Spanish Ministerio de Economı́a y Competitividad under projects TIN2013-42741-P and TIN2016-77902-C3-2-P, and the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF-FEDER)
Use of topical and temporal profiles and their hybridisation for content-based recommendation
In the context of content-based recommender systems, the aim of this paper is
to determine how better profiles can be built and how these affect the
recommendation process based on the incorporation of temporality, i.e. the
inclusion of time in the recommendation process, and topicality, i.e. the
representation of texts associated with users and items using topics and their
combination. The main contribution of the paper is to present two different
ways of hybridising these two dimensions and to evaluate and compare them with
other alternatives
Information Retrieval and Machine Learning Methods for Academic Expert Finding
In the context of academic expert finding, this paper investigates and compares the
performance of information retrieval (IR) and machine learning (ML) methods, including deep
learning, to approach the problem of identifying academic figures who are experts in different
domains when a potential user requests their expertise. IR-based methods construct multifaceted
textual profiles for each expert by clustering information from their scientific publications. Several
methods fully tailored for this problem are presented in this paper. In contrast, ML-based methods
treat expert finding as a classification task, training automatic text classifiers using publications
authored by experts. By comparing these approaches, we contribute to a deeper understanding of
academic-expert-finding techniques and their applicability in knowledge discovery. These methods
are tested with two large datasets from the biomedical field: PMSC-UGR and CORD-19. The results
show how IR techniques were, in general, more robust with both datasets and more suitable than the
ML-based ones, with some exceptions showing good performance.Spanish “Agencia Estatal de Investigación” under
grants PID2019-106758GB-C31 and PID2020-113230RB-C22Spanish “FEDER/Junta de Andalucía-Consejería de Transformación Económica, Industria, Conocimiento y Universidades” under
grant A-TIC-146-UGR20European Regional Development Fund (ERDF-FEDER
Information retrieval and machine learning methods for academic expert finding
In the context of academic expert finding, this paper investigates and compares the performance of information retrieval (IR) and machine learning (ML) methods, including deep learning, to approach the problem of identifying academic figures who are experts in different domains when a potential user requests their expertise. IR-based methods construct multifaceted textual profiles for each expert by clustering information from their scientific publications. Several methods fully tailored for this problem are presented in this paper. In contrast, ML-based methods treat expert finding as a classification task, training automatic text classifiers using publications authored by experts. By comparing these approaches, we contribute to a deeper understanding of academic-expert-finding techniques and their applicability in knowledge discovery. These methods are tested with two large datasets from the biomedical field: PMSC-UGR and CORD-19. The results show how IR techniques were, in general, more robust with both datasets and more suitable than the ML-based ones, with some exceptions showing good performance.Agencia Estatal de Investigación | Ref. PID2019-106758GB-C31Agencia Estatal de Investigación | Ref. PID2020-113230RB-C22FEDER/Junta de Andalucía | Ref. A-TIC-146-UGR2
Automatic Construction of Multi-faceted User Profiles using Text Clustering and its Application to Expert Recommendation and Filtering Problems
In the information age we are living in today, not only are we interested in
accessing multimedia objects such as documents, videos, etc. but also in
searching for professional experts, people or celebrities, possibly for
professional needs or just for fun. Information access systems need to be able
to extract and exploit various sources of information (usually in text format)
about such individuals, and to represent them in a suitable way usually in the
form of a profile. In this article, we tackle the problems of profile-based
expert recommendation and document filtering from a machine learning
perspective by clustering expert textual sources to build profiles and capture
the different hidden topics in which the experts are interested. The experts
will then be represented by means of multi-faceted profiles. Our experiments
show that this is a valid technique to improve the performance of expert
finding and document filtering