10,606 research outputs found
Proving termination through conditional termination
We present a constraint-based method for proving conditional termination of integer programs. Building on this, we construct a framework to prove (unconditional) program termination using a powerful mechanism to combine conditional termination proofs. Our key insight is that a conditional termination proof shows termination for a subset of program execution states which do not need to be considered in the remaining analysis. This facilitates more effective termination as well as non-termination analyses, and allows handling loops with different execution phases naturally. Moreover, our method can deal with sequences of loops compositionally. In an empirical evaluation, we show that our implementation VeryMax outperforms state-of-the-art tools on a range of standard benchmarks.Peer ReviewedPostprint (author's final draft
Goal-Driven Query Answering for Existential Rules with Equality
Inspired by the magic sets for Datalog, we present a novel goal-driven
approach for answering queries over terminating existential rules with equality
(aka TGDs and EGDs). Our technique improves the performance of query answering
by pruning the consequences that are not relevant for the query. This is
challenging in our setting because equalities can potentially affect all
predicates in a dataset. We address this problem by combining the existing
singularization technique with two new ingredients: an algorithm for
identifying the rules relevant to a query and a new magic sets algorithm. We
show empirically that our technique can significantly improve the performance
of query answering, and that it can mean the difference between answering a
query in a few seconds or not being able to process the query at all
A Symbolic Transformation Language and its Application to a Multiscale Method
The context of this work is the design of a software, called MEMSALab,
dedicated to the automatic derivation of multiscale models of arrays of micro-
and nanosystems. In this domain a model is a partial differential equation.
Multiscale methods approximate it by another partial differential equation
which can be numerically simulated in a reasonable time. The challenge consists
in taking into account a wide range of geometries combining thin and periodic
structures with the possibility of multiple nested scales.
In this paper we present a transformation language that will make the
development of MEMSALab more feasible. It is proposed as a Maple package for
rule-based programming, rewriting strategies and their combination with
standard Maple code. We illustrate the practical interest of this language by
using it to encode two examples of multiscale derivations, namely the two-scale
limit of the derivative operator and the two-scale model of the stationary heat
equation.Comment: 36 page
Recommended from our members
Automated verification of refinement laws
Demonic refinement algebras are variants of Kleene algebras. Introduced by von Wright as a light-weight variant of the refinement calculus, their intended semantics are positively disjunctive predicate transformers, and their calculus is entirely within first-order equational logic. So, for the first time, off-the-shelf automated theorem proving (ATP) becomes available for refinement proofs. We used ATP to verify a toolkit of basic refinement laws. Based on this toolkit, we then verified two classical complex refinement laws for action systems by ATP: a data refinement law and Back's atomicity refinement law. We also present a refinement law for infinite loops that has been discovered through automated analysis. Our proof experiments not only demonstrate that refinement can effectively be automated, they also compare eleven different ATP systems and suggest that program verification with variants of Kleene algebras yields interesting theorem proving benchmarks. Finally, we apply hypothesis learning techniques that seem indispensable for automating more complex proofs
Inference of termination conditions for numerical loops in Prolog
We present a new approach to termination analysis of numerical computations
in logic programs. Traditional approaches fail to analyse them due to non
well-foundedness of the integers. We present a technique that allows overcoming
these difficulties. Our approach is based on transforming a program in a way
that allows integrating and extending techniques originally developed for
analysis of numerical computations in the framework of query-mapping pairs with
the well-known framework of acceptability. Such an integration not only
contributes to the understanding of termination behaviour of numerical
computations, but also allows us to perform a correct analysis of such
computations automatically, by extending previous work on a constraint-based
approach to termination. Finally, we discuss possible extensions of the
technique, including incorporating general term orderings.Comment: To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming. To appear in
Theory and Practice of Logic Programmin
Automated verification of termination certificates
In order to increase user confidence, many automated theorem provers provide
certificates that can be independently verified. In this paper, we report on
our progress in developing a standalone tool for checking the correctness of
certificates for the termination of term rewrite systems, and formally proving
its correctness in the proof assistant Coq. To this end, we use the extraction
mechanism of Coq and the library on rewriting theory and termination called
CoLoR
12th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2012) : WST 2012, February 19–23, 2012, Obergurgl, Austria / ed. by Georg Moser
This volume contains the proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2012), to be held February 19–23, 2012 in Obergurgl, Austria. The goal of the Workshop on Termination is to be a venue for presentation and discussion of all topics in and around termination. In this way, the workshop tries to bridge the gaps between different communities interested and active in research in and around termination. The 12th International Workshop on Termination in Obergurgl continues the successful workshops held in St. Andrews (1993), La Bresse (1995), Ede (1997), Dagstuhl (1999), Utrecht (2001), Valencia (2003), Aachen (2004), Seattle (2006), Paris (2007), Leipzig (2009), and Edinburgh (2010). The 12th International Workshop on Termination did welcome contributions on all aspects of termination and complexity analysis. Contributions from the imperative, constraint, functional, and logic programming communities, and papers investigating applications of complexity or termination (for example in program transformation or theorem proving) were particularly welcome. We did receive 18 submissions which all were accepted. Each paper was assigned two reviewers. In addition to these 18 contributed talks, WST 2012, hosts three invited talks by Alexander Krauss, Martin Hofmann, and Fausto Spoto
Mechanized semantics
The goal of this lecture is to show how modern theorem provers---in this
case, the Coq proof assistant---can be used to mechanize the specification of
programming languages and their semantics, and to reason over individual
programs and over generic program transformations, as typically found in
compilers. The topics covered include: operational semantics (small-step,
big-step, definitional interpreters); a simple form of denotational semantics;
axiomatic semantics and Hoare logic; generation of verification conditions,
with application to program proof; compilation to virtual machine code and its
proof of correctness; an example of an optimizing program transformation (dead
code elimination) and its proof of correctness
Strict General Setting for Building Decision Procedures into Theorem Provers
The efficient and flexible incorporating of decision procedures into theorem provers is very important for their successful use. There are several approaches for combining and augmenting of decision procedures; some of them support handling uninterpreted functions, congruence closure, lemma invoking etc. In this paper we present a variant of one general setting for building decision procedures into theorem provers (gs framework [18]). That setting is based on macro inference rules motivated by techniques used in different approaches. The general setting enables a simple describing of different combination/augmentation schemes. In this paper, we further develop and extend this setting by an imposed ordering on the macro inference rules. That ordering leads to a ”strict setting”. It makes implementing and using variants of well-known or new schemes within this framework a very easy task even for a non-expert user. Also, this setting enables easy comparison of different combination/augmentation schemes and combination of their ideas
- …