997 research outputs found
Combinatorial Voter Control in Elections
Voter control problems model situations such as an external agent trying to
affect the result of an election by adding voters, for example by convincing
some voters to vote who would otherwise not attend the election. Traditionally,
voters are added one at a time, with the goal of making a distinguished
alternative win by adding a minimum number of voters. In this paper, we
initiate the study of combinatorial variants of control by adding voters: In
our setting, when we choose to add a voter~, we also have to add a whole
bundle of voters associated with . We study the computational
complexity of this problem for two of the most basic voting rules, namely the
Plurality rule and the Condorcet rule.Comment: An extended abstract appears in MFCS 201
Parameterized Algorithmics for Computational Social Choice: Nine Research Challenges
Computational Social Choice is an interdisciplinary research area involving
Economics, Political Science, and Social Science on the one side, and
Mathematics and Computer Science (including Artificial Intelligence and
Multiagent Systems) on the other side. Typical computational problems studied
in this field include the vulnerability of voting procedures against attacks,
or preference aggregation in multi-agent systems. Parameterized Algorithmics is
a subfield of Theoretical Computer Science seeking to exploit meaningful
problem-specific parameters in order to identify tractable special cases of in
general computationally hard problems. In this paper, we propose nine of our
favorite research challenges concerning the parameterized complexity of
problems appearing in this context
Combinatorial Voting
We study elections that simultaneously decide multiple issues, where voters have independent private values over bundles of issues. The innovation is in considering nonseparable preferences, where issues may be complements or substitutes. Voters face a political exposure problem: the optimal vote for a particular issue will depend on the resolution of the other issues. Moreover, the probabilities that the other issues will pass should be conditioned on being pivotal. We prove that equilibrium exists when distributions over values have full support or when issues are complements. We then study large elections with two issues. There exists a nonempty open set of distributions where the probability of either issue passing fails to converge to either 1 or 0 for all limit equilibria. Thus, the outcomes of large elections are not generically predictable with independent private values, despite the fact that there is no aggregate uncertainty regarding fundamentals. While the Condorcet winner is not necessarily the outcome of a multi-issue election, we provide sufficient conditions that guarantee the implementation of the Condorcet winner. © 2012 The Econometric Society
Reinstating Combinatorial Protections for Manipulation and Bribery in Single-Peaked and Nearly Single-Peaked Electorates
Understanding when and how computational complexity can be used to protect
elections against different manipulative actions has been a highly active
research area over the past two decades. A recent body of work, however, has
shown that many of the NP-hardness shields, previously obtained, vanish when
the electorate has single-peaked or nearly single-peaked preferences. In light
of these results, we investigate whether it is possible to reimpose NP-hardness
shields for such electorates by allowing the voters to specify partial
preferences instead of insisting they cast complete ballots. In particular, we
show that in single-peaked and nearly single-peaked electorates, if voters are
allowed to submit top-truncated ballots, then the complexity of manipulation
and bribery for many voting rules increases from being in P to being
NP-complete.Comment: 28 pages; A shorter version of this paper will appear at the 30th
AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-16
Aggregating Dependency Graphs into Voting Agendas in Multi-Issue Elections
Many collective decision making problems have a
combinatorial structure: the agents involved must
decide on multiple issues and their preferences over
one issue may depend on the choices adopted for
some of the others. Voting is an attractive method
for making collective decisions, but conducting a
multi-issue election is challenging. On the one hand,
requiring agents to vote by expressing their preferences
over all combinations of issues is computationally
infeasible; on the other, decomposing the
problem into several elections on smaller sets of
issues can lead to paradoxical outcomes. Any pragmatic
method for running a multi-issue election will
have to balance these two concerns. We identify
and analyse the problem of generating an agenda
for a given election, specifying which issues to vote
on together in local elections and in which order to
schedule those local elections
The Complexity of Manipulative Attacks in Nearly Single-Peaked Electorates
Many electoral bribery, control, and manipulation problems (which we will
refer to in general as "manipulative actions" problems) are NP-hard in the
general case. It has recently been noted that many of these problems fall into
polynomial time if the electorate is single-peaked (i.e., is polarized along
some axis/issue). However, real-world electorates are not truly single-peaked.
There are usually some mavericks, and so real-world electorates tend to merely
be nearly single-peaked. This paper studies the complexity of
manipulative-action algorithms for elections over nearly single-peaked
electorates, for various notions of nearness and various election systems. We
provide instances where even one maverick jumps the manipulative-action
complexity up to \np-hardness, but we also provide many instances where a
reasonable number of mavericks can be tolerated without increasing the
manipulative-action complexity.Comment: 35 pages, also appears as URCS-TR-2011-96
- âŠ