7,905 research outputs found
Arena: A General Evaluation Platform and Building Toolkit for Multi-Agent Intelligence
Learning agents that are not only capable of taking tests, but also
innovating is becoming a hot topic in AI. One of the most promising paths
towards this vision is multi-agent learning, where agents act as the
environment for each other, and improving each agent means proposing new
problems for others. However, existing evaluation platforms are either not
compatible with multi-agent settings, or limited to a specific game. That is,
there is not yet a general evaluation platform for research on multi-agent
intelligence. To this end, we introduce Arena, a general evaluation platform
for multi-agent intelligence with 35 games of diverse logics and
representations. Furthermore, multi-agent intelligence is still at the stage
where many problems remain unexplored. Therefore, we provide a building toolkit
for researchers to easily invent and build novel multi-agent problems from the
provided game set based on a GUI-configurable social tree and five basic
multi-agent reward schemes. Finally, we provide Python implementations of five
state-of-the-art deep multi-agent reinforcement learning baselines. Along with
the baseline implementations, we release a set of 100 best agents/teams that we
can train with different training schemes for each game, as the base for
evaluating agents with population performance. As such, the research community
can perform comparisons under a stable and uniform standard. All the
implementations and accompanied tutorials have been open-sourced for the
community at https://sites.google.com/view/arena-unity/
Evaluating Visual Conversational Agents via Cooperative Human-AI Games
As AI continues to advance, human-AI teams are inevitable. However, progress
in AI is routinely measured in isolation, without a human in the loop. It is
crucial to benchmark progress in AI, not just in isolation, but also in terms
of how it translates to helping humans perform certain tasks, i.e., the
performance of human-AI teams.
In this work, we design a cooperative game - GuessWhich - to measure human-AI
team performance in the specific context of the AI being a visual
conversational agent. GuessWhich involves live interaction between the human
and the AI. The AI, which we call ALICE, is provided an image which is unseen
by the human. Following a brief description of the image, the human questions
ALICE about this secret image to identify it from a fixed pool of images.
We measure performance of the human-ALICE team by the number of guesses it
takes the human to correctly identify the secret image after a fixed number of
dialog rounds with ALICE. We compare performance of the human-ALICE teams for
two versions of ALICE. Our human studies suggest a counterintuitive trend -
that while AI literature shows that one version outperforms the other when
paired with an AI questioner bot, we find that this improvement in AI-AI
performance does not translate to improved human-AI performance. This suggests
a mismatch between benchmarking of AI in isolation and in the context of
human-AI teams.Comment: HCOMP 201
- …