10,082 research outputs found
Glueability of Resource Proof-Structures: Inverting the Taylor Expansion
A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures
From Proof Nets to the Free *-Autonomous Category
In the first part of this paper we present a theory of proof nets for full
multiplicative linear logic, including the two units. It naturally extends the
well-known theory of unit-free multiplicative proof nets. A linking is no
longer a set of axiom links but a tree in which the axiom links are subtrees.
These trees will be identified according to an equivalence relation based on a
simple form of graph rewriting. We show the standard results of
sequentialization and strong normalization of cut elimination. In the second
part of the paper we show that the identifications enforced on proofs are such
that the class of two-conclusion proof nets defines the free *-autonomous
category.Comment: LaTeX, 44 pages, final version for LMCS; v2: updated bibliograph
Variable binding, symmetric monoidal closed theories, and bigraphs
This paper investigates the use of symmetric monoidal closed (SMC) structure
for representing syntax with variable binding, in particular for languages with
linear aspects. In our setting, one first specifies an SMC theory T, which may
express binding operations, in a way reminiscent from higher-order abstract
syntax. This theory generates an SMC category S(T) whose morphisms are, in a
sense, terms in the desired syntax. We apply our approach to Jensen and
Milner's (abstract binding) bigraphs, which are linear w.r.t. processes. This
leads to an alternative category of bigraphs, which we compare to the original.Comment: An introduction to two more technical previous preprints. Accepted at
Concur '0
Two Algebraic Process Semantics for Contextual Nets
We show that the so-called 'Petri nets are monoids' approach initiated by Meseguer and Montanari can be extended from ordinary place/transition Petri nets to contextual nets by considering suitable non-free monoids of places. The algebraic characterizations of net concurrent computations we provide cover both the collective and the individual token philosophy, uniformly along the two interpretations, and coincide with the classical proposals for place/transition Petri nets in the absence of read-arcs
Proof-graphs for Minimal Implicational Logic
It is well-known that the size of propositional classical proofs can be huge.
Proof theoretical studies discovered exponential gaps between normal or cut
free proofs and their respective non-normal proofs. The aim of this work is to
study how to reduce the weight of propositional deductions. We present the
formalism of proof-graphs for purely implicational logic, which are graphs of a
specific shape that are intended to capture the logical structure of a
deduction. The advantage of this formalism is that formulas can be shared in
the reduced proof.
In the present paper we give a precise definition of proof-graphs for the
minimal implicational logic, together with a normalization procedure for these
proof-graphs. In contrast to standard tree-like formalisms, our normalization
does not increase the number of nodes, when applied to the corresponding
minimal proof-graph representations.Comment: In Proceedings DCM 2013, arXiv:1403.768
Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency
This paper retraces, collects, and summarises contributions of the authors --- in collaboration with others --- on the theme of Petri nets and their categorical relationships to other models of concurrency
Observational Equivalence and Full Abstraction in the Symmetric Interaction Combinators
The symmetric interaction combinators are an equally expressive variant of
Lafont's interaction combinators. They are a graph-rewriting model of
deterministic computation. We define two notions of observational equivalence
for them, analogous to normal form and head normal form equivalence in the
lambda-calculus. Then, we prove a full abstraction result for each of the two
equivalences. This is obtained by interpreting nets as certain subsets of the
Cantor space, called edifices, which play the same role as Boehm trees in the
theory of the lambda-calculus
A language for multiplicative-additive linear logic
A term calculus for the proofs in multiplicative-additive linear logic is
introduced and motivated as a programming language for channel based
concurrency. The term calculus is proved complete for a semantics in linearly
distributive categories with additives. It is also shown that proof equivalence
is decidable by showing that the cut elimination rewrites supply a confluent
rewriting system modulo equations.Comment: 16 pages without appendices, 30 with appendice
- …