1,406 research outputs found
Predicting Scientific Success Based on Coauthorship Networks
We address the question to what extent the success of scientific articles is
due to social influence. Analyzing a data set of over 100000 publications from
the field of Computer Science, we study how centrality in the coauthorship
network differs between authors who have highly cited papers and those who do
not. We further show that a machine learning classifier, based only on
coauthorship network centrality measures at time of publication, is able to
predict with high precision whether an article will be highly cited five years
after publication. By this we provide quantitative insight into the social
dimension of scientific publishing - challenging the perception of citations as
an objective, socially unbiased measure of scientific success.Comment: 21 pages, 2 figures, incl. Supplementary Materia
Feature analysis of multidisciplinary scientific collaboration patterns based on PNAS
The features of collaboration patterns are often considered to be different
from discipline to discipline. Meanwhile, collaborating among disciplines is an
obvious feature emerged in modern scientific research, which incubates several
interdisciplines. The features of collaborations in and among the disciplines
of biological, physical and social sciences are analyzed based on 52,803 papers
published in a multidisciplinary journal PNAS during 1999 to 2013. From those
data, we found similar transitivity and assortativity of collaboration patterns
as well as the identical distribution type of collaborators per author and that
of papers per author, namely a mixture of generalized Poisson and power-law
distributions. In addition, we found that interdisciplinary research is
undertaken by a considerable fraction of authors, not just those with many
collaborators or those with many papers. This case study provides a window for
understanding aspects of multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary collaboration
patterns
Collaboration in sensor network research: an in-depth longitudinal analysis of assortative mixing patterns
Many investigations of scientific collaboration are based on statistical
analyses of large networks constructed from bibliographic repositories. These
investigations often rely on a wealth of bibliographic data, but very little or
no other information about the individuals in the network, and thus, fail to
illustrate the broader social and academic landscape in which collaboration
takes place. In this article, we perform an in-depth longitudinal analysis of a
relatively small network of scientific collaboration (N = 291) constructed from
the bibliographic record of a research center involved in the development and
application of sensor network and wireless technologies. We perform a
preliminary analysis of selected structural properties of the network,
computing its range, configuration and topology. We then support our
preliminary statistical analysis with an in-depth temporal investigation of the
assortative mixing of selected node characteristics, unveiling the researchers'
propensity to collaborate preferentially with others with a similar academic
profile. Our qualitative analysis of mixing patterns offers clues as to the
nature of the scientific community being modeled in relation to its
organizational, disciplinary, institutional, and international arrangements of
collaboration.Comment: Scientometrics (In press
- ā¦