3,178 research outputs found
Gender Disparities in Science? Dropout, Productivity, Collaborations and Success of Male and Female Computer Scientists
Scientific collaborations shape ideas as well as innovations and are both the
substrate for, and the outcome of, academic careers. Recent studies show that
gender inequality is still present in many scientific practices ranging from
hiring to peer-review processes and grant applications. In this work, we
investigate gender-specific differences in collaboration patterns of more than
one million computer scientists over the course of 47 years. We explore how
these patterns change over years and career ages and how they impact scientific
success. Our results highlight that successful male and female scientists
reveal the same collaboration patterns: compared to scientists in the same
career age, they tend to collaborate with more colleagues than other
scientists, seek innovations as brokers and establish longer-lasting and more
repetitive collaborations. However, women are on average less likely to adapt
the collaboration patterns that are related with success, more likely to embed
into ego networks devoid of structural holes, and they exhibit stronger gender
homophily as well as a consistently higher dropout rate than men in all career
ages
Wikipedia as an encyclopaedia of life
In his 2003 essay E O Wilson outlined his vision for an “encyclopaedia of life” comprising “an electronic page for each species of organism on Earth”, each page containing “the scientific name of the species, a pictorial or genomic presentation of the primary type specimen on which its name is based, and a summary of its diagnostic traits.” Although the “quiet revolution” in biodiversity informatics has generated numerous online resources, including some directly inspired by Wilson's essay (e.g., "http://ispecies.org":http://ispecies.org, "http://www.eol.org":http://www.eol.org), we are still some way from the goal of having available online all relevant information about a species, such as its taxonomy, evolutionary history, genomics, morphology, ecology, and behaviour. While the biodiversity community has been developing a plethora of databases, some with overlapping goals and duplicated content, Wikipedia has been slowly growing to the point where it now has over 100,000 pages on biological taxa. My goal in this essay is to explore the idea that, largely independent of the efforts of biodiversity informatics and well-funded international efforts, Wikipedia ("http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page":http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page) has emerged as potentially the best platform for fulfilling E O Wilson’s vision
Exploring Features for Predicting Policy Citations
In this study we performed an initial investigation and evaluation of
altmetrics and their relationship with public policy citation of research
papers. We examined methods for using altmetrics and other data to predict
whether a research paper is cited in public policy and applied receiver
operating characteristic curve on various feature groups in order to evaluate
their potential usefulness. From the methods we tested, classifying based on
tweet count provided the best results, achieving an area under the ROC curve of
0.91.Comment: 2 pages, accepted to JCDL '1
The Evolution of Wikipedia's Norm Network
Social norms have traditionally been difficult to quantify. In any particular
society, their sheer number and complex interdependencies often limit a
system-level analysis. One exception is that of the network of norms that
sustain the online Wikipedia community. We study the fifteen-year evolution of
this network using the interconnected set of pages that establish, describe,
and interpret the community's norms. Despite Wikipedia's reputation for
\textit{ad hoc} governance, we find that its normative evolution is highly
conservative. The earliest users create norms that both dominate the network
and persist over time. These core norms govern both content and interpersonal
interactions using abstract principles such as neutrality, verifiability, and
assume good faith. As the network grows, norm neighborhoods decouple
topologically from each other, while increasing in semantic coherence. Taken
together, these results suggest that the evolution of Wikipedia's norm network
is akin to bureaucratic systems that predate the information age.Comment: 22 pages, 9 figures. Matches published version. Data available at
http://bit.ly/wiki_nor
The Closer the Better: Similarity of Publication Pairs at Different Co-Citation Levels
We investigate the similarities of pairs of articles which are co-cited at
the different co-citation levels of the journal, article, section, paragraph,
sentence and bracket. Our results indicate that textual similarity,
intellectual overlap (shared references), author overlap (shared authors),
proximity in publication time all rise monotonically as the co-citation level
gets lower (from journal to bracket). While the main gain in similarity happens
when moving from journal to article co-citation, all level changes entail an
increase in similarity, especially section to paragraph and paragraph to
sentence/bracket levels. We compare results from four journals over the years
2010-2015: Cell, the European Journal of Operational Research, Physics Letters
B and Research Policy, with consistent general outcomes and some interesting
differences. Our findings motivate the use of granular co-citation information
as defined by meaningful units of text, with implications for, among others,
the elaboration of maps of science and the retrieval of scholarly literature
- …