5 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
UNDERSTANDING CONDITIONAL MODES OF ACTIONS IN CHEMICAL-INDUCED TOXICITY USING RULE MODELS
It is estimated that 115 million animals are used in experimental testing each year. Hence,
shifting efforts toward alternative methods for toxicity assessment is essential. However, slow regulatory acceptance of new approaches is governed by knowledge gaps in toxicity modes of action. In this thesis, I describe these challenges and the use of in vitro screening as an alternative of animal testing. I also discuss common data-based methods to derive hypotheses about toxicity modes of actions, and the associated limitations in capturing multiple biological perturbations.
I applied novel data-based workflows, using rule models, to prioritize in vitro assays predictive of toxicity as well as to detect significant polypharmacology profiles. I explain how constraints were applied to rule-based models to inform meaningful mechanistic interpretation for two toxicity endpoints: rat hepatotoxicity and acute toxicity. I compared assays selected, by rules, for predicting hepatotoxicity with endpoints used in in
vitro models from commercial sources. An overlap was observed including cytochrome
activity, mitochondrial toxicity and immunological responses. However, nuclear receptor
activity, identified in rules, is not currently covered in commercial setups. I also demonstrate that endocrine disruption endpoints extrapolate better into in vivo toxicity when a set of specific conditions are met, such as physicochemical properties associated with good bioavailability.
Next, I examined synergistic interactions between conditions in rules describing acute toxicity. I gained novel insights into how specific stressors potentiate the perturbation by known key events, such as acetylcholinesterase inhibition and neuro-signalling disruption. I show that examining polypharmacology profiles is particularly important at low bioactive potencies.
Further, the overall predictive performance of rules describing acute toxicity was tested against a benchmark Random Forest model in a conformal prediction framework. Irrespective to the data type used in the training, the models were prone to bias over compounds promiscuity, by which high promiscuous compounds were more likely to be predicted as toxic.
Overall, the studies conducted in this thesis provide novel insights into molecular mechanisms of toxicity, namely hepatotoxicity and acute toxicity, and with regards to chemical properties and polypharmacology. This knowledge can be used to improve the utility and design of alternative methods for toxicity, and hence, accelerate the regulatory acceptance.Islamic Development Bank
Cambridge Trust Fun
Characterizing Discriminative Patterns
Discriminative patterns are association patterns that occur with disproportionate frequency in some classes versus others, and have been studied under names such as emerging patterns and contrast sets. Such patterns have demonstrated considerable value for classification and subgroup discovery, but a detailed understanding of the types of interactions among items in a discriminative pattern is lacking. To address this issue, we propose to categorize discriminative patterns according to four types of item interaction: (i) driver-passenger, (ii) coherent, (iii) independent additive and (iv) synergistic beyond independent additive. The coherent, additive, and synergistic patterns are of practical importance, with the latter two representing a gain in the discriminative power of a pattern over its subsets. Synergistic patterns are most restrictive, but perhaps the most interesting since they capture a cooperative effect that is more than the sum of the effects of the individual items in the pattern. For domains such as biomedical and genetic research, differentiating among these types of patterns is critical since each yields very different biological interpretations. For general domains, the characterization provides a novel view of the nature of the discriminative patterns in a dataset, which yields insights beyond those provided by current approaches that focus mostly on pattern-based classification and subgroup discovery. This paper presents a comprehensive discussion that defines these four pattern types and investigates their properties and their relationship to one another. In addition, these ideas are explored for a variety of datasets (ten UCI datasets, one gene expression dataset and two genetic-variation datasets). The results demonstrate the existence, characteristics and statistical significance of the different types of patterns. They also illustrate how pattern characterization can provide novel insights into discriminative pattern mining and the discriminative structure of different datasets. Codes for pattern characterization and supplementary documents are available at http://vk.cs.umn.edu/CD