24 research outputs found
How good are detection proposals, really?
Current top performing Pascal VOC object detectors employ detection proposals
to guide the search for objects thereby avoiding exhaustive sliding window
search across images. Despite the popularity of detection proposals, it is
unclear which trade-offs are made when using them during object detection. We
provide an in depth analysis of ten object proposal methods along with four
baselines regarding ground truth annotation recall (on Pascal VOC 2007 and
ImageNet 2013), repeatability, and impact on DPM detector performance. Our
findings show common weaknesses of existing methods, and provide insights to
choose the most adequate method for different settings
Object-Proposal Evaluation Protocol is 'Gameable'
Object proposals have quickly become the de-facto pre-processing step in a
number of vision pipelines (for object detection, object discovery, and other
tasks). Their performance is usually evaluated on partially annotated datasets.
In this paper, we argue that the choice of using a partially annotated dataset
for evaluation of object proposals is problematic -- as we demonstrate via a
thought experiment, the evaluation protocol is 'gameable', in the sense that
progress under this protocol does not necessarily correspond to a "better"
category independent object proposal algorithm.
To alleviate this problem, we: (1) Introduce a nearly-fully annotated version
of PASCAL VOC dataset, which serves as a test-bed to check if object proposal
techniques are overfitting to a particular list of categories. (2) Perform an
exhaustive evaluation of object proposal methods on our introduced nearly-fully
annotated PASCAL dataset and perform cross-dataset generalization experiments;
and (3) Introduce a diagnostic experiment to detect the bias capacity in an
object proposal algorithm. This tool circumvents the need to collect a densely
annotated dataset, which can be expensive and cumbersome to collect. Finally,
we plan to release an easy-to-use toolbox which combines various publicly
available implementations of object proposal algorithms which standardizes the
proposal generation and evaluation so that new methods can be added and
evaluated on different datasets. We hope that the results presented in the
paper will motivate the community to test the category independence of various
object proposal methods by carefully choosing the evaluation protocol.Comment: 15 pages, 11 figures, 4 table
What makes for effective detection proposals?
Current top performing object detectors employ detection proposals to guide
the search for objects, thereby avoiding exhaustive sliding window search
across images. Despite the popularity and widespread use of detection
proposals, it is unclear which trade-offs are made when using them during
object detection. We provide an in-depth analysis of twelve proposal methods
along with four baselines regarding proposal repeatability, ground truth
annotation recall on PASCAL, ImageNet, and MS COCO, and their impact on DPM,
R-CNN, and Fast R-CNN detection performance. Our analysis shows that for object
detection improving proposal localisation accuracy is as important as improving
recall. We introduce a novel metric, the average recall (AR), which rewards
both high recall and good localisation and correlates surprisingly well with
detection performance. Our findings show common strengths and weaknesses of
existing methods, and provide insights and metrics for selecting and tuning
proposal methods.Comment: TPAMI final version, duplicate proposals removed in experiment