543 research outputs found
Dialectica Categories for the Lambek Calculus
We revisit the old work of de Paiva on the models of the Lambek Calculus in
dialectica models making sure that the syntactic details that were sketchy on
the first version got completed and verified. We extend the Lambek Calculus
with a \kappa modality, inspired by Yetter's work, which makes the calculus
commutative. Then we add the of-course modality !, as Girard did, to
re-introduce weakening and contraction for all formulas and get back the full
power of intuitionistic and classical logic. We also present the categorical
semantics, proved sound and complete. Finally we show the traditional
properties of type systems, like subject reduction, the Church-Rosser theorem
and normalization for the calculi of extended modalities, which we did not have
before
Relational Graph Models at Work
We study the relational graph models that constitute a natural subclass of
relational models of lambda-calculus. We prove that among the lambda-theories
induced by such models there exists a minimal one, and that the corresponding
relational graph model is very natural and easy to construct. We then study
relational graph models that are fully abstract, in the sense that they capture
some observational equivalence between lambda-terms. We focus on the two main
observational equivalences in the lambda-calculus, the theory H+ generated by
taking as observables the beta-normal forms, and H* generated by considering as
observables the head normal forms. On the one hand we introduce a notion of
lambda-K\"onig model and prove that a relational graph model is fully abstract
for H+ if and only if it is extensional and lambda-K\"onig. On the other hand
we show that the dual notion of hyperimmune model, together with
extensionality, captures the full abstraction for H*
Extensional Collapse Situations I: non-termination and unrecoverable errors
We consider a simple model of higher order, functional computation over the
booleans. Then, we enrich the model in order to encompass non-termination and
unrecoverable errors, taken separately or jointly. We show that the models so
defined form a lattice when ordered by the extensional collapse situation
relation, introduced in order to compare models with respect to the amount of
"intensional information" that they provide on computation. The proofs are
carried out by exhibiting suitable applied {\lambda}-calculi, and by exploiting
the fundamental lemma of logical relations
Full Abstraction for the Resource Lambda Calculus with Tests, through Taylor Expansion
We study the semantics of a resource-sensitive extension of the lambda
calculus in a canonical reflexive object of a category of sets and relations, a
relational version of Scott's original model of the pure lambda calculus. This
calculus is related to Boudol's resource calculus and is derived from Ehrhard
and Regnier's differential extension of Linear Logic and of the lambda
calculus. We extend it with new constructions, to be understood as implementing
a very simple exception mechanism, and with a "must" parallel composition.
These new operations allow to associate a context of this calculus with any
point of the model and to prove full abstraction for the finite sub-calculus
where ordinary lambda calculus application is not allowed. The result is then
extended to the full calculus by means of a Taylor Expansion formula. As an
intermediate result we prove that the exception mechanism is not essential in
the finite sub-calculus
A theory of effects and resources: adjunction models and polarised calculi
We consider the Curry-Howard-Lambek correspondence for effectful computation and resource management, specifically proposing polarised calculi together with presheaf-enriched adjunction models as the starting point for a comprehensive semantic theory relating logical systems, typed calculi, and categorical models in this context.
Our thesis is that the combination of effects and resources should be considered orthogonally. Model theoretically, this leads to an understanding of our categorical models from two complementary perspectives: (i) as a linearisation of CBPV (Call-by-Push-Value) adjunction models, and (ii) as an extension of linear/non-linear adjunction models with an adjoint resolution of computational effects. When the linear structure is cartesian and the resource structure is trivial we recover Levy’s notion of CBPV adjunction model, while when the effect structure is trivial we have Benton’s linear/nonlinear adjunction models. Further instances of our model theory include the dialogue categories with a resource modality of Melliès and Tabareau, and the [E]EC ([Enriched] Effect Calculus) models of Egger, Møgelberg and Simpson. Our development substantiates the approach by providing a lifting theorem of linear models into cartesian ones.
artesian ones. To each of our categorical models we systematically associate a typed term calculus, each of which corresponds to a variant of the sequent calculi LJ (Intuitionistic Logic) or ILL (Intuitionistic Linear Logic). The adjoint resolution of effects corresponds to polarisation whereby, syntactically, types locally determine a strict or lazy evaluation order and, semantically, the associativity of cuts is relaxed. In particular, our results show that polarisation provides a computational interpretation of CBPV in direct style. Further, we characterise depolarised models: those where the cut is associative, and where the evaluation order is unimportant. We explain possible advantages of this style of calculi for the operational semantics of effects.G. Munch-Maccagnoni was supported by ERC ECSYM; M. Fiore partially so.This is the author accepted manuscript. The final version is available from the Association for Computing Machinery via http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2837614.283765
Models of sharing graphs: a categorical semantics of let and letrec
To my parents A general abstract theory for computation involving shared resources is presented. We develop the models of sharing graphs, also known as term graphs, in terms of both syntax and semantics. According to the complexity of the permitted form of sharing, we consider four situations of sharing graphs. The simplest is first-order acyclic sharing graphs represented by let-syntax, and others are extensions with higher-order constructs (lambda calculi) and/or cyclic sharing (recursive letrec binding). For each of four settings, we provide the equational theory for representing the sharing graphs, and identify the class of categorical models which are shown to be sound and complete for the theory. The emphasis is put on the algebraic nature of sharing graphs, which leads us to the semantic account of them. We describe the models in terms of the notions of symmetric monoidal categories and functors, additionally with symmetric monoidal adjunctions and trace
A Theory of Explicit Substitutions with Safe and Full Composition
Many different systems with explicit substitutions have been proposed to
implement a large class of higher-order languages. Motivations and challenges
that guided the development of such calculi in functional frameworks are
surveyed in the first part of this paper. Then, very simple technology in named
variable-style notation is used to establish a theory of explicit substitutions
for the lambda-calculus which enjoys a whole set of useful properties such as
full composition, simulation of one-step beta-reduction, preservation of
beta-strong normalisation, strong normalisation of typed terms and confluence
on metaterms. Normalisation of related calculi is also discussed.Comment: 29 pages Special Issue: Selected Papers of the Conference
"International Colloquium on Automata, Languages and Programming 2008" edited
by Giuseppe Castagna and Igor Walukiewic
- …