Building Legal Case Retrieval Systems with Lexical Matching and Summarization using A Pre-Trained Phrase Scoring Model

We present our method for tackling the legal case retrieval task of the Competition on Legal Information Extraction/Entailment 2019. Our approach is based on the idea that summarization is important for retrieval. On one hand, we adopt a summarization based model called encoded summarization which encodes a given document into continuous vector space which embeds the summary properties of the document. We utilize the resource of COLIEE 2018 on which we train the document representation model. On the other hand, we extract lexical features on different parts of a given query and its candidates. We observe that by comparing different parts of the query and its candidates, we can achieve better performance. Furthermore, the combination of the lexical features with latent features by the summarization-based method achieves even better performance. We have achieved the state-of-the-art result for the task on the benchmark of the competition

Combining lexical and neural retrieval with longformer-based summarization for effective case law retrieva

In this paper, we combine lexical and neural ranking models for case law retrieval. In this task, the query is a full case document, and the candidate documents are prior cases that are potentially relevant to the current case. Most documents are longer than 1024 tokens, which makes retrieval and classification with Transformer-based models problematic. We create shorter query documents with different methods: term extraction, noun phrase extraction, entity extraction, and automatic summarization using Longformer-Encoder-Decoder (LED). We then combine the summaries with five different ranking models: a BM25 ranker, statistical language modelling, the Deep Relevance Matching Model (DRMM), a Vanilla BERT ranker, and a Longformer ranker. We optimised all models and combined the best lexical ranker with neural retrieval models using different ensemble classifiers. We evaluate our methods on the retrieval benchmarks from COLIEE’20 and COLIEE’21. We beat state-of-the-art models for case law retrieval with both benchmark sets. Our experiments show the importance of tuning lexical retrieval methods, summarizing query documents, and combining lexical and neural models into one ranker for effective case law retrieval. In addition, training and optimizing our rankers is much faster than passage-level retrieval models (a few hours compared to several days for training)Horizon 2020(H2020)Algorithms and the Foundations of Software technolog

Learning to Extract Keyphrases from Text

Many academic journals ask their authors to provide a list of about five to fifteen key words, to appear on the first page of each article. Since these key words are often phrases of two or more words, we prefer to call them keyphrases. There is a surprisingly wide variety of tasks for which keyphrases are useful, as we discuss in this paper. Recent commercial software, such as Microsoft?s Word 97 and Verity?s Search 97, includes algorithms that automatically extract keyphrases from documents. In this paper, we approach the problem of automatically extracting keyphrases from text as a supervised learning task. We treat a document as a set of phrases, which the learning algorithm must learn to classify as positive or negative examples of keyphrases. Our first set of experiments applies the C4.5 decision tree induction algorithm to this learning task. The second set of experiments applies the GenEx algorithm to the task. We developed the GenEx algorithm specifically for this task. The third set of experiments examines the performance of GenEx on the task of metadata generation, relative to the performance of Microsoft?s Word 97. The fourth and final set of experiments investigates the performance of GenEx on the task of highlighting, relative to Verity?s Search 97. The experimental results support the claim that a specialized learning algorithm (GenEx) can generate better keyphrases than a general-purpose learning algorithm (C4.5) and the non-learning algorithms that are used in commercial software (Word 97 and Search 97)

NLP Driven Models for Automatically Generating Survey Articles for Scientific Topics.

This thesis presents new methods that use natural language processing (NLP) driven models for summarizing research in scientific fields. Given a topic query in the form of a text string, we present methods for finding research articles relevant to the topic as well as summarization algorithms that use lexical and discourse information present in the text of these articles to generate coherent and readable extractive summaries of past research on the topic. In addition to summarizing prior research, good survey articles should also forecast future trends. With this motivation, we present work on forecasting future impact of scientific publications using NLP driven features.PhDComputer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/113407/1/rahuljha_1.pd

Prompt-based Effective Input Reformulation for Legal Case Retrieval

Legal case retrieval plays an important role for legal practitioners to effectively retrieve relevant cases given a query case. Most existing neural legal case retrieval models directly encode the whole legal text of a case to generate a case representation, which is then utilised to conduct a nearest neighbour search for retrieval. Although these straightforward methods have achieved improvement over conventional statistical methods in retrieval accuracy, two significant challenges are identified in this paper: (1) Legal feature alignment: the usage of the whole case text as the input will generally incorporate redundant and noisy information because, from the legal perspective, the determining factor of relevant cases is the alignment of key legal features instead of whole text matching; (2) Legal context preservation: furthermore, since the existing text encoding models usually have an input length limit shorter than the case, the whole case text needs to be truncated or divided into paragraphs, which leads to the loss of the global context of legal information. In this paper, a novel legal case retrieval framework, PromptCase, is proposed to tackle these challenges. Firstly, legal facts and legal issues are identified and formally defined as the key features facilitating legal case retrieval based on a thorough study of the definition of relevant cases from a legal perspective. Secondly, with the determining legal features, a prompt-based encoding scheme is designed to conduct an effective encoding with language models. Extensive zero-shot experiments have been conducted on two benchmark datasets in legal case retrieval, which demonstrate the superior retrieval effectiveness of the proposed PromptCase. The code has been released on https://github.com/yanran-tang/PromptCase