20,270 research outputs found
Transdisciplinarity seen through Information, Communication, Computation, (Inter-)Action and Cognition
Similar to oil that acted as a basic raw material and key driving force of
industrial society, information acts as a raw material and principal mover of
knowledge society in the knowledge production, propagation and application. New
developments in information processing and information communication
technologies allow increasingly complex and accurate descriptions,
representations and models, which are often multi-parameter, multi-perspective,
multi-level and multidimensional. This leads to the necessity of collaborative
work between different domains with corresponding specialist competences,
sciences and research traditions. We present several major transdisciplinary
unification projects for information and knowledge, which proceed on the
descriptive, logical and the level of generative mechanisms. Parallel process
of boundary crossing and transdisciplinary activity is going on in the applied
domains. Technological artifacts are becoming increasingly complex and their
design is strongly user-centered, which brings in not only the function and
various technological qualities but also other aspects including esthetic, user
experience, ethics and sustainability with social and environmental dimensions.
When integrating knowledge from a variety of fields, with contributions from
different groups of stakeholders, numerous challenges are met in establishing
common view and common course of action. In this context, information is our
environment, and informational ecology determines both epistemology and spaces
for action. We present some insights into the current state of the art of
transdisciplinary theory and practice of information studies and informatics.
We depict different facets of transdisciplinarity as we see it from our
different research fields that include information studies, computability,
human-computer interaction, multi-operating-systems environments and
philosophy.Comment: Chapter in a forthcoming book: Information Studies and the Quest for
Transdisciplinarity - Forthcoming book in World Scientific. Mark Burgin and
Wolfgang Hofkirchner, Editor
The uses of qualitative data in multimethodology:Developing causal loop diagrams during the coding process
In this research note we describe a method for exploring the creation of causal loop diagrams (CLDs) from the coding trees developed through a grounded theory approach and using computer aided qualitative data analysis software (CAQDAS). The theoretical background to the approach is multimethodology, in line with Mingerâs description of paradigm crossing and is appropriately situated within the Appreciate and Analyse phases of PSM intervention. The practical use of this method has been explored and three case studies are presented from the domains of organisational change and entrepreneurial studies. The value of this method is twofold; (i) it has the potential to improve dynamic sensibility in the process of qualitative data analysis, and (ii) it can provide a more rigorous approach to developing CLDs in the formation stage of system dynamics modelling. We propose that the further development of this method requires its implementation within CAQDAS packages so that CLD creation, as a precursor to full system dynamics modelling, is contemporaneous with coding and consistent with a bridging strategy of paradigm crossing
Divergence or Convergence in Research and Development and Innovation Between âEastâ and âWestâ?
Book description: Research suggests that innovation and technological change are crucial for the economic recovery of the former centrally planned countries in Central and Eastern Europe. This book analyses the development of innovation systems and technology policy in this region from various perspectives, demonstrating not only its importance but also its complexity
Blogging to express self and social identities, any one?
Blogging has fast emerged as an unparalleled social computing phenomenon not to be ignored. This paper begins by reviewing the motivation factors for blogging identified in the extant literature. These factors can be broadly classified as either activities-based or behavioral-based. We then propose that a root motivation factor based on the theoretical underpinnings of self identity and social identity can better explain blogging motivation compared to the existing factors. Specifically, we posit that individuals could be receptive toward a migration of their real world self and social identities to the online virtual blog environment and thereby cumulates in the formation of blogger virtual identities. Blogger virtual identities is conceptualized as a second order formative construct formulated through two first-order reflective subconstructs, namely the virtual self identities and virtual social identities. Drawing on the theory of planned behavior, we propose a virtual identities model of blogging intention to investigate how the blogger virtual identities can lead to blogging intention and actual blogging behaviour. A two-stage research methodology consisting of a qualitative content analysis and followed by a survey is also proposed. We conclude with a brief discussion on the potential theoretical and practical contributions of this paper
Bridging the gap between policy and science in assessing the health status of marine ecosystems
Human activities, both established and emerging, increasingly affect the provision of marine ecosystem services that deliver societal and economic benefits. Monitoring the status of marine ecosystems and determining how human activities change their capacity to sustain benefits for society requires an evidence-based Integrated Ecosystem Assessment approach that incorporates knowledge of ecosystem functioning and services). Although, there are diverse methods to assess the status of individual ecosystem components, none assesses the health of marine ecosystems holistically, integrating information from multiple ecosystem components. Similarly, while acknowledging the availability of several methods to measure single pressures and assess their impacts, evaluation of cumulative effects of multiple pressures remains scarce. Therefore, an integrative assessment requires us to first understand the response of marine ecosystems to human activities and their pressures and then develop innovative, cost-effective monitoring tools that enable collection of data to assess the health status of large marine areas. Conceptually, combining this knowledge of effective monitoring methods with cost-benefit analyses will help identify appropriate management measures to improve environmental status economically and efficiently. The European project DEVOTES (DEVelopment Of innovative Tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good Environmental Status) specifically addressed t hese topics in order to support policy makers and managers in implementing the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Here, we synthesize our main innovative findings, placing these within the context of recent wider research, and identifying gaps and the major future challenges
Editorial: Bridging the gap between policy and science in assessing the health status of marine ecosystems
Human activities,both established and emerging, increasingly affect the provision of marine ecosystem services that deliver societal and economic benefits. Monitoring the status of marine ecosystems and determining how human activities change their capacity to sustain benefits for society requires an evidence-based Integrated Ecosystem Assessment approach that incorporates knowledge of ecosystem functioning and services).Although,there are diverse methods to assess the status of individual ecosystem components, none assesses the health of marine ecosystems holistically, integrating information from multiple ecosystem components. Similarly,while acknowledging the availability of several methods to measure single pressures and assess their impacts, evaluation of cumulative effects of multiple pressures remains scarce.Therefore,an integrative assessment requires us to first understand the response of marine ecosystems to human activities and their pressures and then develop innovative, cost-effective monitoring tools that enable collection of data to assess the health status of large marine areas. Conceptually, combining this knowledge of effective monitoring methods with cost-benefit analyses will help identify appropriate management measures to improve environmental status economically and efficiently. The European project DEVOTES (DEVelopment Of innovative Tools for understanding marine biodiversity and assessing good Environmental Status) specifically addressed these topics in order to support policymakers and managers in implementing the European Marine Strategy Framework Directive. Here, we synthesize our main innovative findings, placing these within the context of recent wider research, and identifying gaps and the major future challenges
Participatory Modelling and Decision Support for Natural Resources Management in Climate Change Research
The ever greater role given to public participation by laws and regulations, in particular in the field of environmental management calls for new operational methods and tools for managers and practitioners. This paper analyses the potentials and the critical limitations of current approaches in the fields of simulation modelling (SM), public participation (PP) and decision analysis (DA), for natural resources management within the context of climate change research. The potential synergies of combining SM, PP and DA into an integrated methodological framework are identified and a methodological proposal is presented, called NetSyMoD (Network Analysis â Creative System Modelling â Decision Support), which aims at facilitating the involvement of stakeholders or experts in policy - or decision-making processes (P/DMP). A generic P/DMP is formalised in NetSyMoD as a sequence of six main phases: (i) Actors analysis; (ii) Problem analysis; (iii) Creative System Modelling; (iv) DSS design; (v) Analysis of Options; and (vi) Action taking and monitoring. Several variants of the NetSyMoD approach have been adapted to different contexts such as integrated water resources management and coastal management, and, recently it has been applied in climate change research projects. Experience has shown that NetSyMoD may be a useful framework for skilled professionals, for guiding the P/DMP, and providing practical solutions to problems encountered in the different phases of the decision/policy making process, in particular when future scenarios or projections have to be considered, such as in the case of developing and selecting adaptation policies. The various applications of NetSyMoD share the same approach for problem analysis and communication within the group of selected actors, based upon the use of creative thinking techniques, the formalisation of human-environment relationships through the DPSIR framework, and the use of multi-criteria analysis through a Decision Support System (DSS) software.Modelling, Public Participation, Natural Resource Management, Policy, Decision-Making, Governance, DSS
The LIAISE approach for co-designing knowledge on impact assessment tools
Impact Assessment (IA) intends to collect evidence on the likely impacts of
new policies and thereby minimize unwanted side-effects and maximize the
benefits to society. Although it is a requirement in the EC and all OECD
countries, the scope and methods vary considerably. Governments have invested
considerably in research to support the evidence basis of policy making for
sustainable development. However, the general picture shows a gap between the
proliferation of IA tools from the scientific community and their actual use
in the policy process. The FP7 network of excellence LIAISE (www.liaise-
noe.eu) is designed to identify the causes for non-use of IA tools and bridge
the gaps between researchers with a generally strong orientation towards their
(disciplinary) peers and practitioners who tend to focus on their policy
domain and policy problems. LIAISE aims at: 1) understanding of the policy
process and the resulting needs for IA knowledge and IA tools; 2) description
of IA tools and scientific IA expertise in a standardised way; 3) a shared IA
toolbox targeted at the needs of both researchers and practitioners; 4) a
shared IA research agenda integrating scientific knowledge gaps and the
priorities for the development of new IA knowledge that arise from the future
policy agenda; and 5) safeguarding the project results beyond the period of
project funding, by developing an institutional setting and a business plan
that facilitate the extension of the present consortium towards a broad centre
of IA expertise with a structural permanence. A lively interaction between the
different communities involved, is essential to realize these objectives. The
Berlin Conference is an important opportunity to inform external research
groups about the LIAISE approach to bridging the gap between science and
policy. Their feedback and views on possible next steps in the further
integration of the IA research community are highly valued, as well as their
interest to become involved in this process
The LIAISE approach to unite researchers and practitioners in a community of experts on impact assessment
Impact Assessment (IA) intends to collect evidence on the likely impacts of
new policies and thereby minimize unwanted side-effects and maximize the
benefits to society. Although it is a requirement in the EC and all OECD
countries, the scope and methods vary considerably. Governments have invested
considerably in research to support the evidence basis of policy making for
sustainable development. However, the general picture shows a gap between the
proliferation of IA tools from the scientific community and their actual use
in the policy process. The FP7 network of excellence LIAISE (www.liaise-
noe.eu) is designed to identify the causes for non-use of IA tools and bridge
the gaps between researchers with a generally strong orientation towards their
(disciplinary) peers and practitioners who tend to focus on their policy
domain and policy problems. LIAISE aims at: 1) understanding of the policy
process and the resulting needs for IA knowledge and IA tools; 2) description
of IA tools and scientific IA expertise in a standardised way; 3) a shared IA
toolbox targeted at the needs of both researchers and practitioners; 4) a
shared IA research agenda integrating scientific knowledge gaps and the
priorities for the development of new IA knowledge that arise from the future
policy agenda; and 5) safeguarding the project results beyond the period of
project funding, by developing an institutional setting and a business plan
that facilitate the extension of the present consortium towards a broad centre
of IA expertise with a structural permanence. A lively interaction between the
different communities involved, is essential to realize these objectives. The
Berlin Conference is an important opportunity to inform external research
groups about the LIAISE approach to bridging the gap between science and
policy. Their feedback and views on possible next steps in the further
integration of the IA research community are highly valued, as well as their
interest to become involved in this process
- âŠ