485 research outputs found
Invariant Synthesis for Incomplete Verification Engines
We propose a framework for synthesizing inductive invariants for incomplete
verification engines, which soundly reduce logical problems in undecidable
theories to decidable theories. Our framework is based on the counter-example
guided inductive synthesis principle (CEGIS) and allows verification engines to
communicate non-provability information to guide invariant synthesis. We show
precisely how the verification engine can compute such non-provability
information and how to build effective learning algorithms when invariants are
expressed as Boolean combinations of a fixed set of predicates. Moreover, we
evaluate our framework in two verification settings, one in which verification
engines need to handle quantified formulas and one in which verification
engines have to reason about heap properties expressed in an expressive but
undecidable separation logic. Our experiments show that our invariant synthesis
framework based on non-provability information can both effectively synthesize
inductive invariants and adequately strengthen contracts across a large suite
of programs
Predicate Abstraction with Indexed Predicates
Predicate abstraction provides a powerful tool for verifying properties of
infinite-state systems using a combination of a decision procedure for a subset
of first-order logic and symbolic methods originally developed for finite-state
model checking. We consider models containing first-order state variables,
where the system state includes mutable functions and predicates. Such a model
can describe systems containing arbitrarily large memories, buffers, and arrays
of identical processes. We describe a form of predicate abstraction that
constructs a formula over a set of universally quantified variables to describe
invariant properties of the first-order state variables. We provide a formal
justification of the soundness of our approach and describe how it has been
used to verify several hardware and software designs, including a
directory-based cache coherence protocol.Comment: 27 pages, 4 figures, 1 table, short version appeared in International
Conference on Verification, Model Checking and Abstract Interpretation
(VMCAI'04), LNCS 2937, pages = 267--28
Bounded Refinement Types
We present a notion of bounded quantification for refinement types and show
how it expands the expressiveness of refinement typing by using it to develop
typed combinators for: (1) relational algebra and safe database access, (2)
Floyd-Hoare logic within a state transformer monad equipped with combinators
for branching and looping, and (3) using the above to implement a refined IO
monad that tracks capabilities and resource usage. This leap in expressiveness
comes via a translation to "ghost" functions, which lets us retain the
automated and decidable SMT based checking and inference that makes refinement
typing effective in practice.Comment: 14 pages, International Conference on Functional Programming, ICFP
201
Generating Property-Directed Potential Invariants By Backward Analysis
This paper addresses the issue of lemma generation in a k-induction-based
formal analysis of transition systems, in the linear real/integer arithmetic
fragment. A backward analysis, powered by quantifier elimination, is used to
output preimages of the negation of the proof objective, viewed as unauthorized
states, or gray states. Two heuristics are proposed to take advantage of this
source of information. First, a thorough exploration of the possible
partitionings of the gray state space discovers new relations between state
variables, representing potential invariants. Second, an inexact exploration
regroups and over-approximates disjoint areas of the gray state space, also to
discover new relations between state variables. k-induction is used to isolate
the invariants and check if they strengthen the proof objective. These
heuristics can be used on the first preimage of the backward exploration, and
each time a new one is output, refining the information on the gray states. In
our context of critical avionics embedded systems, we show that our approach is
able to outperform other academic or commercial tools on examples of interest
in our application field. The method is introduced and motivated through two
main examples, one of which was provided by Rockwell Collins, in a
collaborative formal verification framework.Comment: In Proceedings FTSCS 2012, arXiv:1212.657
SMT-based Model Checking for Recursive Programs
We present an SMT-based symbolic model checking algorithm for safety
verification of recursive programs. The algorithm is modular and analyzes
procedures individually. Unlike other SMT-based approaches, it maintains both
"over-" and "under-approximations" of procedure summaries. Under-approximations
are used to analyze procedure calls without inlining. Over-approximations are
used to block infeasible counterexamples and detect convergence to a proof. We
show that for programs and properties over a decidable theory, the algorithm is
guaranteed to find a counterexample, if one exists. However, efficiency depends
on an oracle for quantifier elimination (QE). For Boolean Programs, the
algorithm is a polynomial decision procedure, matching the worst-case bounds of
the best BDD-based algorithms. For Linear Arithmetic (integers and rationals),
we give an efficient instantiation of the algorithm by applying QE "lazily". We
use existing interpolation techniques to over-approximate QE and introduce
"Model Based Projection" to under-approximate QE. Empirical evaluation on
SV-COMP benchmarks shows that our algorithm improves significantly on the
state-of-the-art.Comment: originally published as part of the proceedings of CAV 2014; fixed
typos, better wording at some place
Invariant Synthesis for Incomplete Verification Engines
We propose a framework for synthesizing inductive invariants for incomplete verification engines, which soundly reduce logical problems in undecidable theories to decidable theories. Our framework is based on the counter-example guided inductive synthesis principle (CEGIS) and allows verification engines to communicate non-provability information to guide invariant synthesis. We show precisely how the verification engine can compute such non-provability information and how to build effective learning algorithms when invariants are expressed as Boolean combinations of a fixed set of predicates. Moreover, we evaluate our framework in two verification settings, one in which verification engines need to handle quantified formulas and one in which verification engines have to reason about heap properties expressed in an expressive but undecidable separation logic. Our experiments show that our invariant synthesis framework based on non-provability information can both effectively synthesize inductive invariants and adequately strengthen contracts across a large suite of programs
Counterexample-Guided Prophecy for Model Checking Modulo the Theory of Arrays
We develop a framework for model checking infinite-state systems by
automatically augmenting them with auxiliary variables, enabling
quantifier-free induction proofs for systems that would otherwise require
quantified invariants. We combine this mechanism with a counterexample-guided
abstraction refinement scheme for the theory of arrays. Our framework can thus,
in many cases, reduce inductive reasoning with quantifiers and arrays to
quantifier-free and array-free reasoning. We evaluate the approach on a wide
set of benchmarks from the literature. The results show that our implementation
often outperforms state-of-the-art tools, demonstrating its practical
potential.Comment: 23 pages, 1 figure, 1 table, extended version of paper to be
published in International Conference on Tools and Algorithms for the
Construction and Analysis of Systems 202
- …