Random k-SAT and the Power of Two Choices

We study an Achlioptas-process version of the random k-SAT process: a bounded number of k-clauses are drawn uniformly at random at each step, and exactly one added to the growing formula according to a particular rule. We prove the existence of a rule that shifts the satisfiability threshold. This extends a well-studied area of probabilistic combinatorics (Achlioptas processes) to random CSP's. In particular, while a rule to delay the 2-SAT threshold was known previously, this is the first proof of a rule to shift the threshold of k-SAT for k >= 3. We then propose a gap decision problem based upon this semi-random model. The aim of the problem is to investigate the hardness of the random k-SAT decision problem, as opposed to the problem of finding an assignment or certificate of unsatisfiability. Finally, we discuss connections to the study of Achlioptas random graph processes.Comment: 13 page

Quantum adiabatic optimization and combinatorial landscapes

In this paper we analyze the performance of the Quantum Adiabatic Evolution algorithm on a variant of Satisfiability problem for an ensemble of random graphs parametrized by the ratio of clauses to variables, $\gamma=M/N$. We introduce a set of macroscopic parameters (landscapes) and put forward an ansatz of universality for random bit flips. We then formulate the problem of finding the smallest eigenvalue and the excitation gap as a statistical mechanics problem. We use the so-called annealing approximation with a refinement that a finite set of macroscopic variables (versus only energy) is used, and are able to show the existence of a dynamic threshold $\gamma=\gamma_d$ starting with some value of K -- the number of variables in each clause. Beyond dynamic threshold, the algorithm should take exponentially long time to find a solution. We compare the results for extended and simplified sets of landscapes and provide numerical evidence in support of our universality ansatz. We have been able to map the ensemble of random graphs onto another ensemble with fluctuations significantly reduced. This enabled us to obtain tight upper bounds on satisfiability transition and to recompute the dynamical transition using the extended set of landscapes.Comment: 41 pages, 10 figures; added a paragraph on paper's organization to the introduction, fixed reference

Many Hard Examples in Exact Phase Transitions with Application to Generating Hard Satisfiable Instances

This paper first analyzes the resolution complexity of two random CSP models (i.e. Model RB/RD) for which we can establish the existence of phase transitions and identify the threshold points exactly. By encoding CSPs into CNF formulas, it is proved that almost all instances of Model RB/RD have no tree-like resolution proofs of less than exponential size. Thus, we not only introduce new families of CNF formulas hard for resolution, which is a central task of Proof-Complexity theory, but also propose models with both many hard instances and exact phase transitions. Then, the implications of such models are addressed. It is shown both theoretically and experimentally that an application of Model RB/RD might be in the generation of hard satisfiable instances, which is not only of practical importance but also related to some open problems in cryptography such as generating one-way functions. Subsequently, a further theoretical support for the generation method is shown by establishing exponential lower bounds on the complexity of solving random satisfiable and forced satisfiable instances of RB/RD near the threshold. Finally, conclusions are presented, as well as a detailed comparison of Model RB/RD with the Hamiltonian cycle problem and random 3-SAT, which, respectively, exhibit three different kinds of phase transition behavior in NP-complete problems.Comment: 19 pages, corrected mistakes in Theorems 5 and

On the Hardness of SAT with Community Structure

Recent attempts to explain the effectiveness of Boolean satisfiability (SAT) solvers based on conflict-driven clause learning (CDCL) on large industrial benchmarks have focused on the concept of community structure. Specifically, industrial benchmarks have been empirically found to have good community structure, and experiments seem to show a correlation between such structure and the efficiency of CDCL. However, in this paper we establish hardness results suggesting that community structure is not sufficient to explain the success of CDCL in practice. First, we formally characterize a property shared by a wide class of metrics capturing community structure, including "modularity". Next, we show that the SAT instances with good community structure according to any metric with this property are still NP-hard. Finally, we study a class of random instances generated from the "pseudo-industrial" community attachment model of Gir\'aldez-Cru and Levy. We prove that, with high probability, instances from this model that have relatively few communities but are still highly modular require exponentially long resolution proofs and so are hard for CDCL. We also present experimental evidence that our result continues to hold for instances with many more communities. This indicates that actual industrial instances easily solved by CDCL may have some other relevant structure not captured by the community attachment model.Comment: 23 pages. Full version of a SAT 2016 pape