Developing techniques for enhancing comprehensibility of controlled medical terminologies

A controlled medical terminology (CMT) is a collection of concepts (or terms) that are used in the medical domain. Typically, a CMT also contains attributes of those concepts and/or relationships between those concepts. Electronic CMTs are extremely useful and important for communication between and integration of independent information systems in healthcare, because data in this area is highly fragmented. A single query in this area might involve several databases, e.g., a clinical database, a pharmacy database, a radiology database, and a lab test database. Unfortunately, the extensive sizes of CMTs, often containing tens of thousands of concepts and hundreds of thousands of relationships between pairs of those concepts, impose steep learning curves for new users of such CMTs. In this dissertation, we address the problem of helping a user to orient himself in an existing large CMT. In order to help a user comprehend a large, complex CMT, we need to provide abstract views of the CMT. However, at this time, no tools exist for providing a user with such abstract views. One reason for the lack of tools is the absence of a good theory on how to partition an overwhelming CMT into manageable pieces. In this dissertation, we try to overcome the described problem by using a threepronged approach. (1) We use the power of Object-Oriented Databases to design a schema extraction process for large, complex CMTs. The schema resulting from this process provides an excellent, compact representation of the CMT. (2) We develop a theory and a methodology for partitioning a large OODI3 schema, modeled as a graph, into small meaningful units. The methodology relies on the interaction between a human and a computer, making optimal use of the human\u27s semantic knowledge and the computer\u27s speed. Furthermore, the theory and methodology developed for the scbemalevel partitioning are also adapted to the object-level of a CMT. (3) We use purely structural similarities for partitioning CMTs, eliminating the need for a human expert in the partitioning methodology mentioned above. Two large medical terminologies are used as our test beds, the Medical Entities Dictionary (MED) and the Unified Medical Language System (UMLS), which itself contains a number of terminologies

Doctor of Philosophy

dissertationThe problem of information transfer between healthcare sectors and across the continuum of care was examined using a mixed methods approach. These methods include qualitative interviews, retrospective case reviews and an informatic gap analysis. Findings and conclusions are reported for each study. Qualitative interviews were conducted with 16 healthcare representatives from 4 disciplines (medicine, pharmacy, nursing, and social work) and 3 healthcare sectors (hospital, skilled nursing care and community care). Three key themes from a Joint Cognitive Systems theoretical model were used to examine qualitative findings. Agreement on cross-sector care goals is neither defined nor made explicit and in some instances working at cross purposes. Care goals and information paradigms change as patients move from hospitalbased crisis stabilization, diagnosis and treatment to a postdischarge care to home or skilled nursing recovery, function restoration, or end of life support. Control of the transfer process is variable across institutions with little feedback and feed-forward. Lack of knowledge, competency and information tracking threatens sector interdependencies with suspicion and distrust. Sixty-three patients discharged between 2006 and 2008 from hospitals to skilled nursing facilities were randomly selected and reviewed. Most notably missing are discharge summaries (30%), nursing assessments or notes (17%), and social work documents (25%). Advanced directives or living wills necessary for end of life support were present in only 6% of the cases. The presence of information on activities of daily living (ADLs), other disabling conditions, and nutrition was associated with positive outcomes at the 0.001, 0.04 and 0.08levels. Consistent geriatric information transfer across the continuum is needed for relevant care management. An interoperability gap analysis conducted on the LINC (Linking Information Necessary for Care) transfer form determined its interoperability to be the semantic level 0. Detailed Clinical Models representing care management processes are challenged by the lack of consensus in terminology standards across sectors. Construction of information transfer solutions compliant with the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Stage 2 meaningful use criteria must address syntactic and semantic standards, map sector terminologies within care management processes, and account for the lack of standard terminologies in allied health domains

Identifying and reducing inappropriate use of medications using Electronic Health Records

Inappropriate use of medications (IUM) is a global problem that can lead to unnecessary harm to the patients and unnecessary costs across the health care system. Identifying and reducing IUM has been a long-lasting challenge and currently, no systematic and automated solution exists to address it. IUM can be manually identified by experts using medication appropriateness criteria (MAC). In this research I first conducted a review of approaches used to identify IUM and reduce IUM. Next, I developed a conceptual model for representing the MAC, and then developed a tool and a workflow for translating the MAC into structured form. Because indications are an important component of the MAC, I conducted a critical appraisal of existing knowledge sources that can be used to that end, namely the medication-indication knowledge-bases. Finally, I demonstrated how these structured MAC can be used to identify patients who are potentially subject to IUM and evaluated the accuracy of this approach. This research identifies the knowledge gaps and technological challenges in identifying and reducing IUM and addresses some of these gaps through the creation of a representation for MAC, a repository of structured MAC, and a set of tools that can assist in evaluating the impact of interventions aimed to reduce IUM or assess its downstream effects. This research also discusses the limitations of existing methods for executing computable decision support rules and proposes solutions needed to enhance these methods so they can support implementation of the MAC

Information Systems and Healthcare XXXIV: Clinical Knowledge Management Systems—Literature Review and Research Issues for Information Systems

Knowledge Management (KM) has emerged as a possible solution to many of the challenges facing U.S. and international healthcare systems. These challenges include concerns regarding the safety and quality of patient care, critical inefficiency, disparate technologies and information standards, rapidly rising costs and clinical information overload. In this paper, we focus on clinical knowledge management systems (CKMS) research. The objectives of the paper are to evaluate the current state of knowledge management systems diffusion in the clinical setting, assess the present status and focus of CKMS research efforts, and identify research gaps and opportunities for future work across the medical informatics and information systems disciplines. The study analyzes the literature along two dimensions: (1) the knowledge management processes of creation, capture, transfer, and application, and (2) the clinical processes of diagnosis, treatment, monitoring and prognosis. The study reveals that the vast majority of CKMS research has been conducted by the medical and health informatics communities. Information systems (IS) researchers have played a limited role in past CKMS research. Overall, the results indicate that there is considerable potential for IS researchers to contribute their expertise to the improvement of clinical process through technology-based KM approaches

Methods to Facilitate the Capture, Use, and Reuse of Structured and Unstructured Clinical Data.

Electronic health records (EHRs) have great potential to improve quality of care and to support clinical and translational research. While EHRs are being increasingly implemented in U.S. hospitals and clinics, their anticipated benefits have been largely unachieved or underachieved. Among many factors, tedious documentation requirements and the lack of effective information retrieval tools to access and reuse data are two key reasons accounting for this deficiency. In this dissertation, I describe my research on developing novel methods to facilitate the capture, use, and reuse of both structured and unstructured clinical data. Specifically, I develop a framework to investigate potential issues in this research topic, with a focus on three significant challenges. The first challenge is structured data entry (SDE), which can be facilitated by four effective strategies based on my systematic review. I further propose a multi-strategy model to guide the development of future SDE applications. In the follow-up study, I focus on workflow integration and evaluate the feasibility of using EHR audit trail logs for clinical workflow analysis. The second challenge is the use of clinical narratives, which can be supported by my innovative information retrieval (IR) technique called “semantically-based query recommendation (SBQR)”. My user experiment shows that SBQR can help improve the perceived performance of a medical IR system, and may work better on search tasks with average difficulty. The third challenge involves reusing EHR data as a reference standard to benchmark the quality of other health-related information. My study assesses the readability of trial descriptions on ClinicalTrials.gov and found that trial descriptions are very hard to read, even harder than clinical notes. My dissertation has several contributions. First, it conducts pioneer studies with innovative methods to improve the capture, use, and reuse of clinical data. Second, my dissertation provides successful examples for investigators who would like to conduct interdisciplinary research in the field of health informatics. Third, the framework of my research can be a great tool to generate future research agenda in clinical documentation and EHRs. I will continue exploring innovative and effective methods to maximize the value of EHRs.PHDInformationUniversity of Michigan, Horace H. Rackham School of Graduate Studieshttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/135845/1/tzuyu_1.pd

Doctor of Philosophy

DissertationHealth information technology (HIT) in conjunction with quality improvement (QI) methodologies can promote higher quality care at lower costs. Unfortunately, most inpatient hospital settings have been slow to adopt HIT and QI methodologies. Successful adoption requires close attention to workflow. Workflow is the sequence of tasks, processes, and the set of people or resources needed for those tasks that are necessary to accomplish a given goal. Assessing the impact on workflow is an important component of determining whether a HIT implementation will be successful, but little research has been conducted on the impact of eMeasure (electronic performance measure) implementation on workflow. One solution to addressing implementation challenges such as the lack of attention to workflow is an implementation toolkit. An implementation toolkit is an assembly of instruments such as checklists, forms, and planning documents. We developed an initial eMeasure Implementation Toolkit for the heart failure (HF) eMeasure to allow QI and information technology (IT) professionals and their team to assess the impact of implementation on workflow. During the development phase of the toolkit, we undertook a literature review to determine the components of the toolkit. We conducted stakeholder interviews with HIT and QI key informants and subject matter experts (SMEs) at the US Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). Key informants provided a broad understanding about the context of workflow during eMeasure implementation. Based on snowball sampling, we also interviewed other SMEs based on the recommendations of the key informants who suggested tools and provided information essential to the toolkit development. The second phase involved evaluation of the toolkit for relevance and clarity, by experts in non-VA settings. The experts evaluated the sections of the toolkit that contained the tools, via a survey. The final toolkit provides a distinct set of resources and tools, which were iteratively developed during the research and available to users in a single source document. The research methodology provided a strong unified overarching implementation framework in the form of the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) model in combination with a sociotechnical model of HIT that strengthened the overall design of the study

Repeatable and reusable research - Exploring the needs of users for a Data Portal for Disease Phenotyping

Background: Big data research in the field of health sciences is hindered by a lack of agreement on how to identify and define different conditions and their medications. This means that researchers and health professionals often have different phenotype definitions for the same condition. This lack of agreement makes it hard to compare different study findings and hinders the ability to conduct repeatable and reusable research. Objective: This thesis aims to examine the requirements of various users, such as researchers, clinicians, machine learning experts, and managers, for both new and existing data portals for phenotypes (concept libraries). Methods: Exploratory sequential mixed methods were used in this thesis to look at which concept libraries are available, how they are used, what their characteristics are, where there are gaps, and what needs to be done in the future from the point of view of the people who use them. This thesis consists of three phases: 1) two qualitative studies, including one-to-one interviews with researchers, clinicians, machine learning experts, and senior research managers in health data science, as well as focus group discussions with researchers working with the Secured Anonymized Information Linkage databank, 2) the creation of an email survey (i.e., the Concept Library Usability Scale), and 3) a quantitative study with researchers, health professionals, and clinicians. Results: Most of the participants thought that the prototype concept library would be a very helpful resource for conducting repeatable research, but they specified that many requirements are needed before its development. Although all the participants stated that they were aware of some existing concept libraries, most of them expressed negative perceptions about them. The participants mentioned several facilitators that would encourage them to: 1) share their work, such as receiving citations from other researchers; and 2) reuse the work of others, such as saving a lot of time and effort, which they frequently spend on creating new code lists from scratch. They also pointed out several barriers that could inhibit them from: 1) sharing their work, such as concerns about intellectual property (e.g., if they shared their methods before publication, other researchers would use them as their own); and 2) reusing others' work, such as a lack of confidence in the quality and validity of their code lists. Participants suggested some developments that they would like to see happen in order to make research that is done with routine data more reproducible, such as the availability of a drive for more transparency in research methods documentation, such as publishing complete phenotype definitions and clear code lists. Conclusions: The findings of this thesis indicated that most participants valued a concept library for phenotypes. However, only half of the participants felt that they would contribute by providing definitions for the concept library, and they reported many barriers regarding sharing their work on a publicly accessible platform such as the CALIBER research platform. Analysis of interviews, focus group discussions, and qualitative studies revealed that different users have different requirements, facilitators, barriers, and concerns about concept libraries. This work was to investigate if we should develop concept libraries in Kuwait to facilitate the development of improved data sharing. However, at the end of this thesis the recommendation is this would be unlikely to be cost effective or highly valued by users and investment in open access research publications may be of more value to the Kuwait research/academic community