784 research outputs found
Reasoning about Knowledge in Linear Logic: Modalities and Complexity
In a recent paper, Jean-Yves Girard commented that âit has been a long time since philosophy has stopped intereacting with logicâ[17]. Actually, it has no
Bipolar Proof Nets for MALL
In this work we present a computation paradigm based on a concurrent and
incremental construction of proof nets (de-sequentialized or graphical proofs)
of the pure multiplicative and additive fragment of Linear Logic, a resources
conscious refinement of Classical Logic. Moreover, we set a correspon- dence
between this paradigm and those more pragmatic ones inspired to transactional
or distributed systems. In particular we show that the construction of additive
proof nets can be interpreted as a model for super-ACID (or co-operative)
transactions over distributed transactional systems (typi- cally,
multi-databases).Comment: Proceedings of the "Proof, Computation, Complexity" International
Workshop, 17-18 August 2012, University of Copenhagen, Denmar
The ILLTP Library for Intuitionistic Linear Logic
Benchmarking automated theorem proving (ATP) systems using standardized problem sets is a well-established method for measuring their performance. However, the availability of such libraries for non-classical logics is very limited. In this work we propose a library for benchmarking Girard's (propositional) intuitionistic linear logic. For a quick bootstrapping of the collection of problems, and for discussing the selection of relevant problems and understanding their meaning as linear logic theorems, we use translations of the collection of Kleene's intuitionistic theorems in the traditional monograph "Introduction to Metamathematics". We analyze four different translations of intuitionistic logic into linear logic and compare their proofs using a linear logic based prover with focusing. In order to enhance the set of problems in our library, we apply the three provability-preserving translations to the propositional benchmarks in the ILTP Library. Finally, we generate a comprehensive set of reachability problems for Petri nets and encode such problems as linear logic sequents, thus enlarging our collection of problems
Collection analysis for Horn clause programs
We consider approximating data structures with collections of the items that
they contain. For examples, lists, binary trees, tuples, etc, can be
approximated by sets or multisets of the items within them. Such approximations
can be used to provide partial correctness properties of logic programs. For
example, one might wish to specify than whenever the atom is proved
then the two lists and contain the same multiset of items (that is,
is a permutation of ). If sorting removes duplicates, then one would like to
infer that the sets of items underlying and are the same. Such results
could be useful to have if they can be determined statically and automatically.
We present a scheme by which such collection analysis can be structured and
automated. Central to this scheme is the use of linear logic as a omputational
logic underlying the logic of Horn clauses
Combining decision procedures for the reals
We address the general problem of determining the validity of boolean
combinations of equalities and inequalities between real-valued expressions. In
particular, we consider methods of establishing such assertions using only
restricted forms of distributivity. At the same time, we explore ways in which
"local" decision or heuristic procedures for fragments of the theory of the
reals can be amalgamated into global ones. Let Tadd[Q] be the
first-order theory of the real numbers in the language of ordered groups, with
negation, a constant 1, and function symbols for multiplication by
rational constants. Let Tmult[Q] be the analogous theory for the
multiplicative structure, and let T[Q] be the union of the two. We
show that although T[Q] is undecidable, the universal fragment of
T[Q] is decidable. We also show that terms of T[Q]can
fruitfully be put in a normal form. We prove analogous results for theories in
which Q is replaced, more generally, by suitable subfields F
of the reals. Finally, we consider practical methods of establishing
quantifier-free validities that approximate our (impractical) decidability
results.Comment: Will appear in Logical Methods in Computer Scienc
A framework for proof certificates in finite state exploration
Model checkers use automated state exploration in order to prove various
properties such as reachability, non-reachability, and bisimulation over state
transition systems. While model checkers have proved valuable for locating
errors in computer models and specifications, they can also be used to prove
properties that might be consumed by other computational logic systems, such as
theorem provers. In such a situation, a prover must be able to trust that the
model checker is correct. Instead of attempting to prove the correctness of a
model checker, we ask that it outputs its "proof evidence" as a formally
defined document--a proof certificate--and that this document is checked by a
trusted proof checker. We describe a framework for defining and checking proof
certificates for a range of model checking problems. The core of this framework
is a (focused) proof system that is augmented with premises that involve "clerk
and expert" predicates. This framework is designed so that soundness can be
guaranteed independently of any concerns for the correctness of the clerk and
expert specifications. To illustrate the flexibility of this framework, we
define and formally check proof certificates for reachability and
non-reachability in graphs, as well as bisimulation and non-bisimulation for
labeled transition systems. Finally, we describe briefly a reference checker
that we have implemented for this framework.Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2015, arXiv:1507.0837
Linear logic for constructive mathematics
We show that numerous distinctive concepts of constructive mathematics arise
automatically from an interpretation of "linear higher-order logic" into
intuitionistic higher-order logic via a Chu construction. This includes
apartness relations, complemented subsets, anti-subgroups and anti-ideals,
strict and non-strict order pairs, cut-valued metrics, and apartness spaces. We
also explain the constructive bifurcation of classical concepts using the
choice between multiplicative and additive linear connectives. Linear logic
thus systematically "constructivizes" classical definitions and deals
automatically with the resulting bookkeeping, and could potentially be used
directly as a basis for constructive mathematics in place of intuitionistic
logic.Comment: 39 page
- âŚ