6 research outputs found
OBDD-Based Representation of Interval Graphs
A graph can be described by the characteristic function of the
edge set which maps a pair of binary encoded nodes to 1 iff the nodes
are adjacent. Using \emph{Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams} (OBDDs) to store
can lead to a (hopefully) compact representation. Given the OBDD as an
input, symbolic/implicit OBDD-based graph algorithms can solve optimization
problems by mainly using functional operations, e.g. quantification or binary
synthesis. While the OBDD representation size can not be small in general, it
can be provable small for special graph classes and then also lead to fast
algorithms. In this paper, we show that the OBDD size of unit interval graphs
is and the OBDD size of interval graphs is $O(\
| V \ | \log \ | V \ |)\Omega(\ | V \ | \log
\ | V \ |)O(\log \ | V \ |)O(\log^2 \ | V \ |)$ operations and
evaluate the algorithms empirically.Comment: 29 pages, accepted for 39th International Workshop on Graph-Theoretic
Concepts 201
Asymptotically Optimal Bounds For OBDDs And The Solution Of Some Basic OBDD Problems
Ordered binary decision diagrams (OBDDs) are nowadays the most common dynamic data structure or representation type for Boolean functions. Among the many areas of application are verification, model checking, and computer aided design. For many functions it is easy to estimate the OBDD size but asymptotically optimal bounds are only known in simple situations. In this paper, methods for proving asymptotically optimal bounds are presented and applied to the solution of some basic problems concerning OBDDs. The largest size increase by a synthesis step of pi-OBDDs followed by an optimal reordering is determined as well as the largest ratio of the size of deterministic finite automata, quasi-reduced OBDDs, and zero-suppressed BDDs compared to the size of OBDDs. Moreover, the worst case OBDD size of functions with a given number of 1-inputs is investigated