3 research outputs found
Arithmetic Circuit Lower Bounds via MaxRank
We introduce the polynomial coefficient matrix and identify maximum rank of
this matrix under variable substitution as a complexity measure for
multivariate polynomials. We use our techniques to prove super-polynomial lower
bounds against several classes of non-multilinear arithmetic circuits. In
particular, we obtain the following results :
As our main result, we prove that any homogeneous depth-3 circuit for
computing the product of matrices of dimension requires
size. This improves the lower bounds by Nisan and
Wigderson(1995) when .
There is an explicit polynomial on variables and degree at most
for which any depth-3 circuit of product dimension at most
(dimension of the space of affine forms feeding into each
product gate) requires size . This generalizes the lower bounds
against diagonal circuits proved by Saxena(2007). Diagonal circuits are of
product dimension 1.
We prove a lower bound on the size of product-sparse
formulas. By definition, any multilinear formula is a product-sparse formula.
Thus, our result extends the known super-polynomial lower bounds on the size of
multilinear formulas by Raz(2006).
We prove a lower bound on the size of partitioned arithmetic
branching programs. This result extends the known exponential lower bound on
the size of ordered arithmetic branching programs given by Jansen(2008).Comment: 22 page
On the Limits of Depth Reduction at Depth 3 Over Small Finite Fields
Recently, Gupta et.al. [GKKS2013] proved that over Q any -variate
and -degree polynomial in VP can also be computed by a depth three
circuit of size . Over fixed-size
finite fields, Grigoriev and Karpinski proved that any
circuit that computes (or ) must be of size
[GK1998]. In this paper, we prove that over fixed-size finite fields, any
circuit for computing the iterated matrix multiplication
polynomial of generic matrices of size , must be of size
. The importance of this result is that over fixed-size
fields there is no depth reduction technique that can be used to compute all
the -variate and -degree polynomials in VP by depth 3 circuits of
size . The result [GK1998] can only rule out such a possibility
for depth 3 circuits of size .
We also give an example of an explicit polynomial () in
VNP (not known to be in VP), for which any circuit computing
it (over fixed-size fields) must be of size . The
polynomial we consider is constructed from the combinatorial design. An
interesting feature of this result is that we get the first examples of two
polynomials (one in VP and one in VNP) such that they have provably stronger
circuit size lower bounds than Permanent in a reasonably strong model of
computation.
Next, we prove that any depth 4
circuit computing
(over any field) must be of size . To the best of our knowledge, the polynomial is the
first example of an explicit polynomial in VNP such that it requires
size depth four circuits, but no known matching
upper bound