Transport or Store? Synthesizing Flow-based Microfluidic Biochips using Distributed Channel Storage

Flow-based microfluidic biochips have attracted much atten- tion in the EDA community due to their miniaturized size and execution efficiency. Previous research, however, still follows the traditional computing model with a dedicated storage unit, which actually becomes a bottleneck of the performance of bio- chips. In this paper, we propose the first architectural synthe- sis framework considering distributed storage constructed tem- porarily from transportation channels to cache fluid samples. Since distributed storage can be accessed more efficiently than a dedicated storage unit and channels can switch between the roles of transportation and storage easily, biochips with this dis- tributed computing architecture can achieve a higher execution efficiency even with fewer resources. Experimental results con- firm that the execution efficiency of a bioassay can be improved by up to 28% while the number of valves in the biochip can be reduced effectively.Comment: ACM/IEEE Design Automation Conference (DAC), June 201

Synthesis of biochemical applications on digital microfluidic biochips with operation variability

Abstract—Microfluidic-based biochips are replacing the con-ventional biochemical analyzers, and are able to integrate on-chip all the necessary functions for biochemical analysis using microfluidics. The digital microfluidic biochips are based on the manipulation of liquids not as a continuous flow, but as discrete droplets. Researchers have presented approaches for the synthesis of digital microfluidic biochips, which, starting from a biochemical application and a given biochip architecture, determine the allocation, resource binding, scheduling and place-ment of the operations in the application. Existing approaches consider that on-chip operations, such as splitting a droplet of liquid, are perfect. However, these operations have variability margins, which can impact the correctness of the biochemical application. We consider that a split operation, which goes beyond specified variability bounds, is faulty. The fault is detected using on-chip volume sensors. We have proposed an abstract model for a biochemical application, consisting of a sequencing graph, which can capture all the fault scenarios in the application. Starting from this model, we have proposed a synthesis approach that, for a given chip area and number of sensors, can derive a fault-tolerant implementation. Two fault-tolerant scheduling techniques have been proposed and compared. We show that, by taking into account fault-occurrence information, we can derive better quality implementations, which leads to shorter application completion times, even in the case of faults. The proposed synthesis approach under operation variability has been evaluated using several benchmarks. I

Abstraction Layers for Scalable Microfluidic Biocomputers (Extended Version)

Microfluidic devices are emerging as an attractive technology for automatically orchestrating the reactions needed in a biological computer. Thousands of microfluidic primitives have already been integrated on a single chip, and recent trends indicate that the hardware complexity is increasing at rates comparable to Moore's Law. As in the case of silicon, it will be critical to develop abstraction layers--such as programming languages and Instruction Set Architectures (ISAs)--that decouple software development from changes in the underlying device technology.Towards this end, this paper presents BioStream, a portable language for describing biology protocols, and the Fluidic ISA, a stable interface for microfluidic chip designers. A novel algorithm translates microfluidic mixing operations from the BioStream layer to the Fluidic ISA. To demonstrate the benefits of these abstraction layers, we build two microfluidic chips that can both execute BioStream code despite significant differences at the device level. We consider this to be an important step towards building scalable biocomputers

Droplet routing for digital microfluidic biochips based on microelectrode dot array architecture

A digital microfluidic biochip (DMFB) is a device that digitizes fluidic samples into tiny droplets and operates chemical processes on a single chip. Movement control of droplets can be realized by using electrowetting-on-dielectric (EWOD) technology. DMFBs have high configurability, high sensitivity, low cost and reduced human error as well as a promising future in the applications of point-of-care medical diagnostic, and DNA sequencing. As the demands of scalability, configurability and portability increase, a new DMFB architecture called Microelectrode Dot Array (MEDA) has been introduced recently to allow configurable electrodes shape and more precise control of droplets. The objective of this work is to investigate a routing algorithm which can not only handle the routing problem for traditional DMFBs, but also be able to route different sizes of droplets and incorporate diagonal movements for MEDA. The proposed droplet routing algorithm is based on 3D-A* search algorithm. The simulation results show that the proposed algorithm can reduce the maximum latest arrival time, average latest arrival time and total number of used cells. By enabling channel-based routing in MEDA, the equivalent total number of used cells can be significantly reduced. Compared to all existing algorithms, the proposed algorithm can achieve so far the least average latest arrival time

Placement and routing for cross-referencing digital microfluidic biochips.

Xiao, Zigang."October 2010."Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2011.Includes bibliographical references (leaves 62-66).Abstracts in English and Chinese.Abstract --- p.iAcknowledgement --- p.viChapter 1 --- Introduction --- p.1Chapter 1.1 --- Microfluidic Technology --- p.2Chapter 1.1.1 --- Continuous Flow Microfluidic System --- p.2Chapter 1.1.2 --- Digital Microfluidic System --- p.2Chapter 1.2 --- Pin-Constrained Biochips --- p.4Chapter 1.2.1 --- Droplet-Trace-Based Array Partitioning Method --- p.5Chapter 1.2.2 --- Broadcast-addressing Method --- p.5Chapter 1.2.3 --- Cross-Referencing Method --- p.6Chapter 1.2.3.1 --- Electrode Interference in Cross-Referencing Biochips --- p.7Chapter 1.3 --- Computer-Aided Design Techniques for Biochip --- p.8Chapter 1.4 --- Placement Problem in Biochips --- p.8Chapter 1.5 --- Droplet Routing Problem in Cross-Referencing Biochips --- p.11Chapter 1.6 --- Our Contributions --- p.14Chapter 1.7 --- Thesis Organization --- p.15Chapter 2 --- Literature Review --- p.16Chapter 2.1 --- Introduction --- p.16Chapter 2.2 --- Previous Works on Placement --- p.17Chapter 2.2.1 --- Basic Simulated Annealing --- p.17Chapter 2.2.2 --- Unified Synthesis Approach --- p.18Chapter 2.2.3 --- Droplet-Routing-Aware Unified Synthesis Approach --- p.19Chapter 2.2.4 --- Simulated Annealing Using T-tree Representation --- p.20Chapter 2.3 --- Previous Works on Routing --- p.21Chapter 2.3.1 --- Direct-Addressing Droplet Routing --- p.22Chapter 2.3.1.1 --- A* Search Method --- p.22Chapter 2.3.1.2 --- Open Shortest Path First Method --- p.23Chapter 2.3.1.3 --- A Two Phase Algorithm --- p.24Chapter 2.3.1.4 --- Network-Flow Based Method --- p.25Chapter 2.3.1.5 --- Bypassibility and Concession Method --- p.26Chapter 2.3.2 --- Cross-Referencing Droplet Routing --- p.28Chapter 2.3.2.1 --- Graph Coloring Method --- p.28Chapter 2.3.2.2 --- Clique Partitioning Method --- p.30Chapter 2.3.2.3 --- Progressive-ILP Method --- p.31Chapter 2.4 --- Conclusion --- p.32Chapter 3 --- CrossRouter for Cross-Referencing Biochip --- p.33Chapter 3.1 --- Introduction --- p.33Chapter 3.2 --- Problem Formulation --- p.34Chapter 3.3 --- Overview of Our Method --- p.35Chapter 3.4 --- Net Order Computation --- p.35Chapter 3.5 --- Propagation Stage --- p.36Chapter 3.5.1 --- Fluidic Constraint Check --- p.38Chapter 3.5.2 --- Electrode Constraint Check --- p.38Chapter 3.5.3 --- Handling 3-pin net --- p.44Chapter 3.5.4 --- Waste Reservoir --- p.45Chapter 3.6 --- Backtracking Stage --- p.45Chapter 3.7 --- Rip-up and Re-route Nets --- p.45Chapter 3.8 --- Experimental Results --- p.46Chapter 3.9 --- Conclusion --- p.47Chapter 4 --- Placement in Cross-Referencing Biochip --- p.49Chapter 4.1 --- Introduction --- p.49Chapter 4.2 --- Problem Formulation --- p.50Chapter 4.3 --- Overview of the method --- p.50Chapter 4.4 --- Dispenser and Reservoir Location Generation --- p.51Chapter 4.5 --- Solving Placement Problem Using ILP --- p.51Chapter 4.5.1 --- Constraints --- p.53Chapter 4.5.1.1 --- Validity of modules --- p.53Chapter 4.5.1.2 --- Non-overlapping and separation of Modules --- p.53Chapter 4.5.1.3 --- Droplet-Routing length constraint --- p.54Chapter 4.5.1.4 --- Optical detector resource constraint --- p.55Chapter 4.5.2 --- Objective --- p.55Chapter 4.5.3 --- Problem Partition --- p.56Chapter 4.6 --- Pin Assignment --- p.56Chapter 4.7 --- Experimental Results --- p.57Chapter 4.8 --- Conclusion --- p.59Chapter 5 --- Conclusion --- p.60Bibliography --- p.6