1,122 research outputs found
A Pattern Language for High-Performance Computing Resilience
High-performance computing systems (HPC) provide powerful capabilities for
modeling, simulation, and data analytics for a broad class of computational
problems. They enable extreme performance of the order of quadrillion
floating-point arithmetic calculations per second by aggregating the power of
millions of compute, memory, networking and storage components. With the
rapidly growing scale and complexity of HPC systems for achieving even greater
performance, ensuring their reliable operation in the face of system
degradations and failures is a critical challenge. System fault events often
lead the scientific applications to produce incorrect results, or may even
cause their untimely termination. The sheer number of components in modern
extreme-scale HPC systems and the complex interactions and dependencies among
the hardware and software components, the applications, and the physical
environment makes the design of practical solutions that support fault
resilience a complex undertaking. To manage this complexity, we developed a
methodology for designing HPC resilience solutions using design patterns. We
codified the well-known techniques for handling faults, errors and failures
that have been devised, applied and improved upon over the past three decades
in the form of design patterns. In this paper, we present a pattern language to
enable a structured approach to the development of HPC resilience solutions.
The pattern language reveals the relations among the resilience patterns and
provides the means to explore alternative techniques for handling a specific
fault model that may have different efficiency and complexity characteristics.
Using the pattern language enables the design and implementation of
comprehensive resilience solutions as a set of interconnected resilience
patterns that can be instantiated across layers of the system stack.Comment: Proceedings of the 22nd European Conference on Pattern Languages of
Program
CRAFT: A library for easier application-level Checkpoint/Restart and Automatic Fault Tolerance
In order to efficiently use the future generations of supercomputers, fault
tolerance and power consumption are two of the prime challenges anticipated by
the High Performance Computing (HPC) community. Checkpoint/Restart (CR) has
been and still is the most widely used technique to deal with hard failures.
Application-level CR is the most effective CR technique in terms of overhead
efficiency but it takes a lot of implementation effort. This work presents the
implementation of our C++ based library CRAFT (Checkpoint-Restart and Automatic
Fault Tolerance), which serves two purposes. First, it provides an extendable
library that significantly eases the implementation of application-level
checkpointing. The most basic and frequently used checkpoint data types are
already part of CRAFT and can be directly used out of the box. The library can
be easily extended to add more data types. As means of overhead reduction, the
library offers a build-in asynchronous checkpointing mechanism and also
supports the Scalable Checkpoint/Restart (SCR) library for node level
checkpointing. Second, CRAFT provides an easier interface for User-Level
Failure Mitigation (ULFM) based dynamic process recovery, which significantly
reduces the complexity and effort of failure detection and communication
recovery mechanism. By utilizing both functionalities together, applications
can write application-level checkpoints and recover dynamically from process
failures with very limited programming effort. This work presents the design
and use of our library in detail. The associated overheads are thoroughly
analyzed using several benchmarks
rDLB: A Novel Approach for Robust Dynamic Load Balancing of Scientific Applications with Parallel Independent Tasks
Scientific applications often contain large and computationally intensive
parallel loops. Dynamic loop self scheduling (DLS) is used to achieve a
balanced load execution of such applications on high performance computing
(HPC) systems. Large HPC systems are vulnerable to processors or node failures
and perturbations in the availability of resources. Most self-scheduling
approaches do not consider fault-tolerant scheduling or depend on failure or
perturbation detection and react by rescheduling failed tasks. In this work, a
robust dynamic load balancing (rDLB) approach is proposed for the robust self
scheduling of independent tasks. The proposed approach is proactive and does
not depend on failure or perturbation detection. The theoretical analysis of
the proposed approach shows that it is linearly scalable and its cost decrease
quadratically by increasing the system size. rDLB is integrated into an MPI DLS
library to evaluate its performance experimentally with two computationally
intensive scientific applications. Results show that rDLB enables the tolerance
of up to (P minus one) processor failures, where P is the number of processors
executing an application. In the presence of perturbations, rDLB boosted the
robustness of DLS techniques up to 30 times and decreased application execution
time up to 7 times compared to their counterparts without rDLB
Radiation-Induced Error Criticality in Modern HPC Parallel Accelerators
In this paper, we evaluate the error criticality of radiation-induced errors on modern High-Performance Computing (HPC) accelerators (Intel Xeon Phi and NVIDIA K40) through a dedicated set of metrics. We show that, as long as imprecise computing is concerned, the simple mismatch detection is not sufficient to evaluate and compare the radiation sensitivity of HPC devices and algorithms. Our analysis quantifies and qualifies radiation effects on applications’ output correlating the number of corrupted elements with their spatial locality. Also, we provide the mean relative error (dataset-wise) to evaluate radiation-induced error magnitude.
We apply the selected metrics to experimental results obtained in various radiation test campaigns for a total of more than 400 hours of beam time per device. The amount of data we gathered allows us to evaluate the error criticality of a representative set of algorithms from HPC suites. Additionally, based on the characteristics of the tested algorithms, we draw generic reliability conclusions for broader classes of codes. We show that arithmetic operations are less critical for the K40, while Xeon Phi is more reliable when executing particles interactions solved through Finite Difference Methods. Finally, iterative stencil operations seem the most reliable on both architectures.This work was supported by the STIC-AmSud/CAPES scientific cooperation program under the EnergySFE research
project grant 99999.007556/2015-02, EU H2020 Programme, and MCTI/RNP-Brazil under the HPC4E Project, grant agreement
n° 689772. Tested K40 boards were donated thanks to Steve Keckler, Timothy Tsai, and Siva Hari from NVIDIA.Postprint (author's final draft
- …