An assessment of the usability of biometric signature systems using the human-biometric sensor interaction model’

Signature biometrics is a widely used form of user authentication. As a behavioural biometric, samples have inherent inconsistencies which must be accounted for within an automated system. Performance deterioration of a tuned biometric software system may be caused by an interaction error with a biometric capture device, however, using conventional error metrics, system and user interaction errors are combined, thereby masking the contribution by each element. In this paper we explore the application of the Human-Biometric Sensor Interaction (HBSI) model to signature as an exemplar of a behavioural biometric. Using observational data collected from a range of subjects, our study shows that usability issues can be identified specific to individual capture device technologies. While most interactions are successful, a range of common interaction errors need to be mitigated by design to reduce overall error rates

The Role of Test Administrator and Error

This study created a framework to quantify and mitigate the amount of error that test administrators introduced to a biometric system during data collection. Prior research has focused only on the subject and the errors they make when interacting with biometric systems, while ignoring the test administrator. This study used a longitudinal data collection, focusing on demographics in government identification forms such as driver\u27s licenses, fingerprint metadata such a moisture and skin temperature, and face image compliance to an ISO best practice standard. Error was quantified from the first visit and baseline test administrator error rates were measured. Additional training, software development, and error mitigation techniques were introduced before a second visit, in which the error rates were measured again. The new system greatly reduced the amount of test administrator error and improved the integrity of the data collected. Findings from this study show how to measure test administrator error and how to reduce it in future data collections

An assessment of the usability of biometric signature systems using the human-biometric sensor interaction model

Signature biometrics is a widely used form of user authentication. As a behavioural biometric, samples have inherent inconsistencies which must be accounted for within an automated system. Performance deterioration of a tuned biometric software system may be caused by an interaction error with a biometric capture device, however, using conventional error metrics, system and user interaction errors are combined, thereby masking the contribution by each element. In this paper we explore the application of the Human-Biometric Sensor Interaction (HBSI) model to signature as an exemplar of a behavioural biometric. Using observational data collected from a range of subjects, our study shows that usability issues can be identified specific to individual capture device technologies. While most interactions are successful, a range of common interaction errors need to be mitigated by design to reduce overall error rates

Touch-screen Behavioural Biometrics on Mobile Devices

Robust user verification on mobile devices is one of the top priorities globally from a financial security and privacy viewpoint and has led to biometric verification complementing or replacing PIN and password methods. Research has shown that behavioural biometric methods, with their promise of improved security due to inimitable nature and the lure of unintrusive, implicit, continuous verification, could define the future of privacy and cyber security in an increasingly mobile world. Considering the real-life nature of problems relating to mobility, this study aims to determine the impact of user interaction factors that affect verification performance and usability for behavioural biometric modalities on mobile devices. Building on existing work on biometric performance assessments, it asks: To what extent does the biometric performance remain stable when faced with movements or change of environment, over time and other device related factors influencing usage of mobile devices in real-life applications? Further it seeks to provide answers to: What could further improve the performance for behavioural biometric modalities? Based on a review of the literature, a series of experiments were executed to collect a dataset consisting of touch dynamics based behavioural data mirroring various real-life usage scenarios of a mobile device. Responses were analysed using various uni-modal and multi-modal frameworks. Analysis demonstrated that existing verification methods using touch modalities of swipes, signatures and keystroke dynamics adapt poorly when faced with a variety of usage scenarios and have challenges related to time persistence. The results indicate that a multi-modal solution does have a positive impact towards improving the verification performance. On this basis, it is recommended to explore alternatives in the form of dynamic, variable thresholds and smarter template selection strategy which hold promise. We believe that the evaluation results presented in this thesis will streamline development of future solutions for improving the security of behavioural-based modalities on mobile biometrics

A Performance Assessment Framework for Mobile Biometrics

This project aims to develop and explore a robust framework for assessing biometric systems on mobile platforms, where data is often collected in non-constrained, potentially challenging environments. The framework enables the performance assessment given a particular platform, biometric modality, usage environment, user base and required security level. The ubiquity of mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets has increased access to Internet-based services across various scenarios and environments. Citizens use mobile platforms for an ever-expanding set of services and interactions, often transferring personal information, and conducting financial transactions. Accurate identity authentication for physical access to the device and service is, therefore, critical to ensure the security of the individual, information, and transaction. Biometrics provides an established alternative to conventional authentication methods. Mobile devices offer considerable opportunities to utilise biometric data from an enhanced range of sensors alongside temporal information on the use of the device itself. For example, cameras and dedicated fingerprint devices can capture front-line physiological biometric samples (already used for device log-on applications and payment authorisation schemes such as Apple Pay) alongside voice capture using conventional microphones. Understanding the performance of these biometric modalities is critical to assessing suitability for deployment. Providing a robust performance and security assessment given a set of deployment variables is critical to ensure appropriate security and accuracy. Conventional biometrics testing is typically performed in controlled, constrained environments that fail to encapsulate mobile systems' daily (and developing) use. This thesis aims to develop an understanding of biometric performance on mobile devices. The impact of different mobile platforms, and the range of environmental conditions in use, on biometrics' accuracy, usability, security, and utility is poorly understood. This project will also examine the application and performance of mobile biometrics when in motion