14 research outputs found
On the Limits of Depth Reduction at Depth 3 Over Small Finite Fields
Recently, Gupta et.al. [GKKS2013] proved that over Q any -variate
and -degree polynomial in VP can also be computed by a depth three
circuit of size . Over fixed-size
finite fields, Grigoriev and Karpinski proved that any
circuit that computes (or ) must be of size
[GK1998]. In this paper, we prove that over fixed-size finite fields, any
circuit for computing the iterated matrix multiplication
polynomial of generic matrices of size , must be of size
. The importance of this result is that over fixed-size
fields there is no depth reduction technique that can be used to compute all
the -variate and -degree polynomials in VP by depth 3 circuits of
size . The result [GK1998] can only rule out such a possibility
for depth 3 circuits of size .
We also give an example of an explicit polynomial () in
VNP (not known to be in VP), for which any circuit computing
it (over fixed-size fields) must be of size . The
polynomial we consider is constructed from the combinatorial design. An
interesting feature of this result is that we get the first examples of two
polynomials (one in VP and one in VNP) such that they have provably stronger
circuit size lower bounds than Permanent in a reasonably strong model of
computation.
Next, we prove that any depth 4
circuit computing
(over any field) must be of size . To the best of our knowledge, the polynomial is the
first example of an explicit polynomial in VNP such that it requires
size depth four circuits, but no known matching
upper bound
Arithmetic circuits: the chasm at depth four gets wider
In their paper on the "chasm at depth four", Agrawal and Vinay have shown
that polynomials in m variables of degree O(m) which admit arithmetic circuits
of size 2^o(m) also admit arithmetic circuits of depth four and size 2^o(m).
This theorem shows that for problems such as arithmetic circuit lower bounds or
black-box derandomization of identity testing, the case of depth four circuits
is in a certain sense the general case. In this paper we show that smaller
depth four circuits can be obtained if we start from polynomial size arithmetic
circuits. For instance, we show that if the permanent of n*n matrices has
circuits of size polynomial in n, then it also has depth 4 circuits of size
n^O(sqrt(n)*log(n)). Our depth four circuits use integer constants of
polynomial size. These results have potential applications to lower bounds and
deterministic identity testing, in particular for sums of products of sparse
univariate polynomials. We also give an application to boolean circuit
complexity, and a simple (but suboptimal) reduction to polylogarithmic depth
for arithmetic circuits of polynomial size and polynomially bounded degree
On Σ A Σ A Σ Circuits: The Role of Middle Σ Fan-in, Homogeneity and Bottom Degree.
We study polynomials computed by depth five Σ ∧ Σ ∧ Σ arithmetic circuits where ‘Σ’ and ‘∧’ represent gates that compute sum and power of their inputs respectively. Such circuits compute polynomials of the form Pt i=1 Q αi i , where Qi = Pri j=1 ` dij ij where `ij are linear forms and ri, αi, t > 0. These circuits are a natural generalization of the well known class of Σ ∧ Σ circuits and received significant attention recently. We prove an exponential lower bound for the monomial x1 · · · xn against depth five Σ ∧ Σ [≤n] ∧ [≥21] Σ and Σ ∧ Σ [≤2 √n/1000] ∧ [≥ √n] Σ arithmetic circuits where the bottom Σ gate is homogeneous. Our results show that the fan-in of the middle Σ gates, the degree of the bottom powering gates and the homogeneity at the bottom Σ gates play a crucial role in the computational power of Σ ∧ Σ ∧ Σ circuits