61,289 research outputs found
Recommended from our members
Applying the Full Protection and Security Standard of International Investment Law to Digital Assets
This article considers the possibility that digital assets of foreign investors such as websites and computer systems could be protected by the full protection and security (âFPSâ) standard common to many bilateral investment treaties. Such assets can properly be described as investments and the flexible nature of the FPS standard observed in recent arbitration practice could be extended to cover civil disturbances such as 'cyber attacks' against companies. The article considers host state liability with respect to the prevention of harm to digital assets as well as failure to enforce laws that prohibit it. The lack of governmental control over websites suggests that it would be difficult to ascribe state liability under an FPS clause, except possibly in situations of large scale internet infrastructure collapse. A duty to prosecute attacks against digital assets, while common to many jurisdictions and seen in international instruments, is inappropriate as an investment treaty claim because of difficulties in compensation. The FPS standard further appears to incorporate a degree of contextual proportionality linked to the host stateâs resources and this may prevent successful claims against Developing States where many cyber attacks occur
Evolution of Threats in the Global Risk Network
With a steadily growing population and rapid advancements in technology, the
global economy is increasing in size and complexity. This growth exacerbates
global vulnerabilities and may lead to unforeseen consequences such as global
pandemics fueled by air travel, cyberspace attacks, and cascading failures
caused by the weakest link in a supply chain. Hence, a quantitative
understanding of the mechanisms driving global network vulnerabilities is
urgently needed. Developing methods for efficiently monitoring evolution of the
global economy is essential to such understanding. Each year the World Economic
Forum publishes an authoritative report on the state of the global economy and
identifies risks that are likely to be active, impactful or contagious. Using a
Cascading Alternating Renewal Process approach to model the dynamics of the
global risk network, we are able to answer critical questions regarding the
evolution of this network. To fully trace the evolution of the network we
analyze the asymptotic state of risks (risk levels which would be reached in
the long term if the risks were left unabated) given a snapshot in time, this
elucidates the various challenges faced by the world community at each point in
time. We also investigate the influence exerted by each risk on others. Results
presented here are obtained through either quantitative analysis or
computational simulations.Comment: 27 pages, 15 figure
The Global Risks Report 2016, 11th Edition
Now in its 11th edition, The Global Risks Report 2016 draws attention to ways that global risks could evolve and interact in the next decade. The year 2016 marks a forceful departure from past findings, as the risks about which the Report has been warning over the past decade are starting to manifest themselves in new, sometimes unexpected ways and harm people, institutions and economies. Warming climate is likely to raise this year's temperature to 1° Celsius above the pre-industrial era, 60 million people, equivalent to the world's 24th largest country and largest number in recent history, are forcibly displaced, and crimes in cyberspace cost the global economy an estimated US$445 billion, higher than many economies' national incomes. In this context, the Reportcalls for action to build resilience â the "resilience imperative" â and identifies practical examples of how it could be done.The Report also steps back and explores how emerging global risks and major trends, such as climate change, the rise of cyber dependence and income and wealth disparity are impacting already-strained societies by highlighting three clusters of risks as Risks in Focus. As resilience building is helped by the ability to analyse global risks from the perspective of specific stakeholders, the Report also analyses the significance of global risks to the business community at a regional and country-level
Response Functions to Critical Shocks in Social Sciences: An Empirical and Numerical Study
We show that, provided one focuses on properly selected episodes, one can
apply to the social sciences the same observational strategy that has proved
successful in natural sciences such as astrophysics or geodynamics. For
instance, in order to probe the cohesion of a policy, one can, in different
countries, study the reactions to some huge and sudden exogenous shocks, which
we call Dirac shocks. This approach naturally leads to the notion of structural
(as opposed or complementary to temporal) forecast. Although structural
predictions are by far the most common way to test theories in the natural
sciences, they have been much less used in the social sciences. The Dirac shock
approach opens the way to testing structural predictions in the social
sciences. The examples reported here suggest that critical events are able to
reveal pre-existing ``cracks'' because they probe the social cohesion which is
an indicator and predictor of future evolution of the system, and in some cases
foreshadows a bifurcation. We complement our empirical work with numerical
simulations of the response function (``damage spreading'') to Dirac shocks in
the Sznajd model of consensus build-up. We quantify the slow relaxation of the
difference between perturbed and unperturbed systems, the conditions under
which the consensus is modified by the shock and the large variability from one
realization to another
Error and attack tolerance of complex networks
Many complex systems, such as communication networks, display a surprising
degree of robustness: while key components regularly malfunction, local
failures rarely lead to the loss of the global information-carrying ability of
the network. The stability of these complex systems is often attributed to the
redundant wiring of the functional web defined by the systems' components. In
this paper we demonstrate that error tolerance is not shared by all redundant
systems, but it is displayed only by a class of inhomogeneously wired networks,
called scale-free networks. We find that scale-free networks, describing a
number of systems, such as the World Wide Web, Internet, social networks or a
cell, display an unexpected degree of robustness, the ability of their nodes to
communicate being unaffected by even unrealistically high failure rates.
However, error tolerance comes at a high price: these networks are extremely
vulnerable to attacks, i.e. to the selection and removal of a few nodes that
play the most important role in assuring the network's connectivity.Comment: 14 pages, 4 figures, Late
- âŠ