9,047 research outputs found
Lexical typology : a programmatic sketch
The present paper is an attempt to lay the foundation for Lexical Typology as a new kind of linguistic typology.1 The goal of Lexical Typology is to investigate crosslinguistically significant patterns of interaction between lexicon and grammar
Acquiring Word-Meaning Mappings for Natural Language Interfaces
This paper focuses on a system, WOLFIE (WOrd Learning From Interpreted
Examples), that acquires a semantic lexicon from a corpus of sentences paired
with semantic representations. The lexicon learned consists of phrases paired
with meaning representations. WOLFIE is part of an integrated system that
learns to transform sentences into representations such as logical database
queries. Experimental results are presented demonstrating WOLFIE's ability to
learn useful lexicons for a database interface in four different natural
languages. The usefulness of the lexicons learned by WOLFIE are compared to
those acquired by a similar system, with results favorable to WOLFIE. A second
set of experiments demonstrates WOLFIE's ability to scale to larger and more
difficult, albeit artificially generated, corpora. In natural language
acquisition, it is difficult to gather the annotated data needed for supervised
learning; however, unannotated data is fairly plentiful. Active learning
methods attempt to select for annotation and training only the most informative
examples, and therefore are potentially very useful in natural language
applications. However, most results to date for active learning have only
considered standard classification tasks. To reduce annotation effort while
maintaining accuracy, we apply active learning to semantic lexicons. We show
that active learning can significantly reduce the number of annotated examples
required to achieve a given level of performance
Russian word sense induction by clustering averaged word embeddings
The paper reports our participation in the shared task on word sense
induction and disambiguation for the Russian language (RUSSE-2018). Our team
was ranked 2nd for the wiki-wiki dataset (containing mostly homonyms) and 5th
for the bts-rnc and active-dict datasets (containing mostly polysemous words)
among all 19 participants.
The method we employed was extremely naive. It implied representing contexts
of ambiguous words as averaged word embedding vectors, using off-the-shelf
pre-trained distributional models. Then, these vector representations were
clustered with mainstream clustering techniques, thus producing the groups
corresponding to the ambiguous word senses. As a side result, we show that word
embedding models trained on small but balanced corpora can be superior to those
trained on large but noisy data - not only in intrinsic evaluation, but also in
downstream tasks like word sense induction.Comment: Proceedings of the 24rd International Conference on Computational
Linguistics and Intellectual Technologies (Dialogue-2018
From Word to Sense Embeddings: A Survey on Vector Representations of Meaning
Over the past years, distributed semantic representations have proved to be
effective and flexible keepers of prior knowledge to be integrated into
downstream applications. This survey focuses on the representation of meaning.
We start from the theoretical background behind word vector space models and
highlight one of their major limitations: the meaning conflation deficiency,
which arises from representing a word with all its possible meanings as a
single vector. Then, we explain how this deficiency can be addressed through a
transition from the word level to the more fine-grained level of word senses
(in its broader acceptation) as a method for modelling unambiguous lexical
meaning. We present a comprehensive overview of the wide range of techniques in
the two main branches of sense representation, i.e., unsupervised and
knowledge-based. Finally, this survey covers the main evaluation procedures and
applications for this type of representation, and provides an analysis of four
of its important aspects: interpretability, sense granularity, adaptability to
different domains and compositionality.Comment: 46 pages, 8 figures. Published in Journal of Artificial Intelligence
Researc
RDF/S)XML Linguistic Annotation of Semantic Web Pages
Although with the Semantic Web initiative much research on web pages semantic annotation has already done by AI researchers, linguistic text annotation, including the semantic one, was originally developed in Corpus Linguistics and its results have been somehow neglected by AI. ..
- âŠ