350 research outputs found
Stone-Type Dualities for Separation Logics
Stone-type duality theorems, which relate algebraic and
relational/topological models, are important tools in logic because -- in
addition to elegant abstraction -- they strengthen soundness and completeness
to a categorical equivalence, yielding a framework through which both algebraic
and topological methods can be brought to bear on a logic. We give a systematic
treatment of Stone-type duality for the structures that interpret bunched
logics, starting with the weakest systems, recovering the familiar BI and
Boolean BI (BBI), and extending to both classical and intuitionistic Separation
Logic. We demonstrate the uniformity and modularity of this analysis by
additionally capturing the bunched logics obtained by extending BI and BBI with
modalities and multiplicative connectives corresponding to disjunction,
negation and falsum. This includes the logic of separating modalities (LSM), De
Morgan BI (DMBI), Classical BI (CBI), and the sub-classical family of logics
extending Bi-intuitionistic (B)BI (Bi(B)BI). We additionally obtain as
corollaries soundness and completeness theorems for the specific Kripke-style
models of these logics as presented in the literature: for DMBI, the
sub-classical logics extending BiBI and a new bunched logic, Concurrent Kleene
BI (connecting our work to Concurrent Separation Logic), this is the first time
soundness and completeness theorems have been proved. We thus obtain a
comprehensive semantic account of the multiplicative variants of all standard
propositional connectives in the bunched logic setting. This approach
synthesises a variety of techniques from modal, substructural and categorical
logic and contextualizes the "resource semantics" interpretation underpinning
Separation Logic amongst them
Theorems of Alternatives for Substructural Logics
A theorem of alternatives provides a reduction of validity in a substructural
logic to validity in its multiplicative fragment. Notable examples include a
theorem of Arnon Avron that reduces the validity of a disjunction of
multiplicative formulas in the R-mingle logic RM to the validity of a linear
combination of these formulas, and Gordan's theorem for solutions of linear
systems over the real numbers, that yields an analogous reduction for validity
in Abelian logic A. In this paper, general conditions are provided for
axiomatic extensions of involutive uninorm logic without additive constants to
admit a theorem of alternatives. It is also shown that a theorem of
alternatives for a logic can be used to establish (uniform) deductive
interpolation and completeness with respect to a class of dense totally ordered
residuated lattices
Bounded-analytic sequent calculi and embeddings for hypersequent logics
A sequent calculus with the subformula property has long been recognised as a highly favourable starting point for the proof theoretic investigation of a logic. However, most logics of interest cannot be presented using a sequent calculus with the subformula property. In response, many formalisms more intricate than the sequent calculus have been formulated. In this work we identify an alternative: retain the sequent calculus but generalise the subformula property to permit specific axiom substitutions and their subformulas. Our investigation leads to a classification of generalised subformula properties and is applied to infinitely many substructural, intermediate, and modal logics (specifically: those with a cut-free hypersequent calculus). We also develop a complementary perspective on the generalised subformula properties in terms of logical embeddings. This yields new complexity upper bounds for contractive-mingle substructural logics and situates isolated results on the so-called simple substitution property within a general theory
Kleene Algebras, Regular Languages and Substructural Logics
We introduce the two substructural propositional logics KL, KL+, which use
disjunction, fusion and a unary, (quasi-)exponential connective. For both we
prove strong completeness with respect to the interpretation in Kleene algebras
and a variant thereof. We also prove strong completeness for language models,
where each logic comes with a different interpretation. We show that for both
logics the cut rule is admissible and both have a decidable consequence
relation.Comment: In Proceedings GandALF 2014, arXiv:1408.556
Canonical formulas for k-potent commutative, integral, residuated lattices
Canonical formulas are a powerful tool for studying intuitionistic and modal
logics. Actually, they provide a uniform and semantic way to axiomatise all
extensions of intuitionistic logic and all modal logics above K4. Although the
method originally hinged on the relational semantics of those logics, recently
it has been completely recast in algebraic terms. In this new perspective
canonical formulas are built from a finite subdirectly irreducible algebra by
describing completely the behaviour of some operations and only partially the
behaviour of some others. In this paper we export the machinery of canonical
formulas to substructural logics by introducing canonical formulas for
-potent, commutative, integral, residuated lattices (-).
We show that any subvariety of - is axiomatised by canonical
formulas. The paper ends with some applications and examples.Comment: Some typo corrected and additional comments adde
- …