3,511 research outputs found
Temporalized logics and automata for time granularity
Suitable extensions of the monadic second-order theory of k successors have
been proposed in the literature to capture the notion of time granularity. In
this paper, we provide the monadic second-order theories of downward unbounded
layered structures, which are infinitely refinable structures consisting of a
coarsest domain and an infinite number of finer and finer domains, and of
upward unbounded layered structures, which consist of a finest domain and an
infinite number of coarser and coarser domains, with expressively complete and
elementarily decidable temporal logic counterparts.
We obtain such a result in two steps. First, we define a new class of
combined automata, called temporalized automata, which can be proved to be the
automata-theoretic counterpart of temporalized logics, and show that relevant
properties, such as closure under Boolean operations, decidability, and
expressive equivalence with respect to temporal logics, transfer from component
automata to temporalized ones. Then, we exploit the correspondence between
temporalized logics and automata to reduce the task of finding the temporal
logic counterparts of the given theories of time granularity to the easier one
of finding temporalized automata counterparts of them.Comment: Journal: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming Journal Acronym:
TPLP Category: Paper for Special Issue (Verification and Computational Logic)
Submitted: 18 March 2002, revised: 14 Januari 2003, accepted: 5 September
200
Computabilities of Validity and Satisfiability in Probability Logics over Finite and Countable Models
The -logic (which is called E-logic in this paper) of
Kuyper and Terwijn is a variant of first order logic with the same syntax, in
which the models are equipped with probability measures and in which the
quantifier is interpreted as "there exists a set of measure
such that for each , ...." Previously, Kuyper and
Terwijn proved that the general satisfiability and validity problems for this
logic are, i) for rational , respectively
-complete and -hard, and ii) for ,
respectively decidable and -complete. The adjective "general" here
means "uniformly over all languages."
We extend these results in the scenario of finite models. In particular, we
show that the problems of satisfiability by and validity over finite models in
E-logic are, i) for rational , respectively
- and -complete, and ii) for , respectively
decidable and -complete. Although partial results toward the countable
case are also achieved, the computability of E-logic over countable
models still remains largely unsolved. In addition, most of the results, of
this paper and of Kuyper and Terwijn, do not apply to individual languages with
a finite number of unary predicates. Reducing this requirement continues to be
a major point of research.
On the positive side, we derive the decidability of the corresponding
problems for monadic relational languages --- equality- and function-free
languages with finitely many unary and zero other predicates. This result holds
for all three of the unrestricted, the countable, and the finite model cases.
Applications in computational learning theory, weighted graphs, and neural
networks are discussed in the context of these decidability and undecidability
results.Comment: 47 pages, 4 tables. Comments welcome. Fixed errors found by Rutger
Kuype
Lewis meets Brouwer: constructive strict implication
C. I. Lewis invented modern modal logic as a theory of "strict implication".
Over the classical propositional calculus one can as well work with the unary
box connective. Intuitionistically, however, the strict implication has greater
expressive power than the box and allows to make distinctions invisible in the
ordinary syntax. In particular, the logic determined by the most popular
semantics of intuitionistic K becomes a proper extension of the minimal normal
logic of the binary connective. Even an extension of this minimal logic with
the "strength" axiom, classically near-trivial, preserves the distinction
between the binary and the unary setting. In fact, this distinction and the
strong constructive strict implication itself has been also discovered by the
functional programming community in their study of "arrows" as contrasted with
"idioms". Our particular focus is on arithmetical interpretations of the
intuitionistic strict implication in terms of preservativity in extensions of
Heyting's Arithmetic.Comment: Our invited contribution to the collection "L.E.J. Brouwer, 50 years
later
Logic and Topology for Knowledge, Knowability, and Belief - Extended Abstract
In recent work, Stalnaker proposes a logical framework in which belief is
realized as a weakened form of knowledge. Building on Stalnaker's core
insights, and using frameworks developed by Bjorndahl and Baltag et al., we
employ topological tools to refine and, we argue, improve on this analysis. The
structure of topological subset spaces allows for a natural distinction between
what is known and (roughly speaking) what is knowable; we argue that the
foundational axioms of Stalnaker's system rely intuitively on both of these
notions. More precisely, we argue that the plausibility of the principles
Stalnaker proposes relating knowledge and belief relies on a subtle
equivocation between an "evidence-in-hand" conception of knowledge and a weaker
"evidence-out-there" notion of what could come to be known. Our analysis leads
to a trimodal logic of knowledge, knowability, and belief interpreted in
topological subset spaces in which belief is definable in terms of knowledge
and knowability. We provide a sound and complete axiomatization for this logic
as well as its uni-modal belief fragment. We then consider weaker logics that
preserve suitable translations of Stalnaker's postulates, yet do not allow for
any reduction of belief. We propose novel topological semantics for these
irreducible notions of belief, generalizing our previous semantics, and provide
sound and complete axiomatizations for the corresponding logics.Comment: In Proceedings TARK 2017, arXiv:1707.08250. The full version of this
paper, including the longer proofs, is at arXiv:1612.0205
Critical analysis of the Carmo-Jones system of Contrary-to-Duty obligations
We offer a technical analysis of the contrary to duty system proposed in
Carmo-Jones. We offer analysis/simplification/repair of their system and
compare it with our own related system
- …