3 research outputs found

    Symbols for Computer-Aided Design Software Operations: Selection and Effect on User Recall

    Get PDF
    Computer Aided Design (CAD) software can be difficult to learn. Past research has not investigated how the selection of symbols used to represent CAD operations affects a new user’s ability to learn CAD concepts. In this paper, we explore how symbol choice impacts short-term recall as measured by accuracy and response time. We performed an initial study to identify what 2D symbols users draw to perform common CAD operations. This study identified common symbols for five CAD operations and highlighted differences between symbols drawn by inexperienced and experienced CAD users. Then, we conducted a second study with three groups using different input methods: selecting Autodesk Inventor CAD operation icons, selecting 2D symbols derived from the first study, and physically drawing those same symbols. There is not a statistically significant difference between the three groups’ average question accuracy. For time taken to submit responses, the group selecting Autodesk icons was lowest, followed by the group selecting the symbols, and then the group drawing the symbols. Additionally, the group drawing the symbols had a greater improvement in response time compared to the group selecting Autodesk icons. Other differences between groups were not found to be statistically significant. The results from our second study suggest a negative correlation between our set of user-created symbols and response time, and the potential for further research on other symbols from our first study

    FITTING A PARAMETRIC MODEL TO A CLOUD OF POINTS VIA OPTIMIZATION METHODS

    Get PDF
    Computer Aided Design (CAD) is a powerful tool for designing parametric geometry. However, many CAD models of current configurations are constructed in previous generations of CAD systems, which represent the configuration simply as a collection of surfaces instead of as a parametrized solid model. But since many modern analysis techniques take advantage of a parametrization, one often has to re-engineer the configuration into a parametric model. The objective here is to generate an efficient, robust, and accurate method for fitting parametric models to a cloud of points. The process uses a gradient-based optimization technique, which is applied to the whole cloud, without the need to segment or classify the points in the cloud a priori. First, for the points associated with any component, a variant of the Levenberg-Marquardt gradient-based optimization method (ILM) is used to find the set of model parameters that minimizes the least-square errors between the model and the points. The efficiency of the ILM algorithm is greatly improved through the use of analytic geometric sensitivities and sparse matrix techniques. Second, for cases in which one does not know a priori the correspondences between points in the cloud and the geometry model\u27s components, an efficient initialization and classification algorithm is introduced. While this technique works well once the configuration is close enough, it occasionally fails when the initial parametrized configuration is too far from the cloud of points. To circumvent this problem, the objective function is modified, which has yielded good results for all cases tested. This technique is applied to a series of increasingly complex configurations. The final configuration represents a full transport aircraft configuration, with a wing, fuselage, empennage, and engines. Although only applied to aerospace applications, the technique is general enough to be applicable in any domain for which basic parametrized models are available
    corecore