Defective and Clustered Graph Colouring

Consider the following two ways to colour the vertices of a graph where the requirement that adjacent vertices get distinct colours is relaxed. A colouring has "defect" $d$ if each monochromatic component has maximum degree at most $d$. A colouring has "clustering" $c$ if each monochromatic component has at most $c$ vertices. This paper surveys research on these types of colourings, where the first priority is to minimise the number of colours, with small defect or small clustering as a secondary goal. List colouring variants are also considered. The following graph classes are studied: outerplanar graphs, planar graphs, graphs embeddable in surfaces, graphs with given maximum degree, graphs with given maximum average degree, graphs excluding a given subgraph, graphs with linear crossing number, linklessly or knotlessly embeddable graphs, graphs with given Colin de Verdi\`ere parameter, graphs with given circumference, graphs excluding a fixed graph as an immersion, graphs with given thickness, graphs with given stack- or queue-number, graphs excluding $K_t$ as a minor, graphs excluding $K_{s,t}$ as a minor, and graphs excluding an arbitrary graph $H$ as a minor. Several open problems are discussed.Comment: This is a preliminary version of a dynamic survey to be published in the Electronic Journal of Combinatoric

Some results on (a:b)-choosability

A solution to a problem of Erd\H{o}s, Rubin and Taylor is obtained by showing that if a graph $G$ is $(a:b)$-choosable, and $c/d > a/b$, then $G$ is not necessarily $(c:d)$-choosable. Applying probabilistic methods, an upper bound for the $k^{th}$ choice number of a graph is given. We also prove that a directed graph with maximum outdegree $d$ and no odd directed cycle is $(k(d+1):k)$-choosable for every $k \geq 1$. Other results presented in this article are related to the strong choice number of graphs (a generalization of the strong chromatic number). We conclude with complexity analysis of some decision problems related to graph choosability

Acyclic 4-choosability of planar graphs without 4-cycles

summary:A proper vertex coloring of a graph $G$ is acyclic if there is no bicolored cycle in $G$. In other words, each cycle of $G$ must be colored with at least three colors. Given a list assignment $L=\{L(v)\colon v\in V\}$, if there exists an acyclic coloring $\pi$ of $G$ such that $\pi (v)\in L(v)$ for all $v\in V$, then we say that $G$ is acyclically $L$-colorable. If $G$ is acyclically $L$-colorable for any list assignment $L$ with $|L(v)|\ge k$ for all $v\in V$, then $G$ is acyclically $k$-choosable. In 2006, Montassier, Raspaud and Wang conjectured that every planar graph without 4-cycles is acyclically 4-choosable. However, this has been as yet verified only for some restricted classes of planar graphs. In this paper, we prove that every planar graph with neither 4-cycles nor intersecting $i$-cycles for each $i\in \{3,5\}$ is acyclically 4-choosable

Facial unique-maximum colorings of plane graphs with restriction on big vertices

A facial unique-maximum coloring of a plane graph is a proper coloring of the vertices using positive integers such that each face has a unique vertex that receives the maximum color in that face. Fabrici and G\"{o}ring (2016) proposed a strengthening of the Four Color Theorem conjecturing that all plane graphs have a facial unique-maximum coloring using four colors. This conjecture has been disproven for general plane graphs and it was shown that five colors suffice. In this paper we show that plane graphs, where vertices of degree at least four induce a star forest, are facially unique-maximum 4-colorable. This improves a previous result for subcubic plane graphs by Andova, Lidick\'y, Lu\v{z}ar, and \v{S}krekovski (2018). We conclude the paper by proposing some problems.Comment: 8 pages, 5 figure