Optimal-Hash Exact String Matching Algorithms

String matching is the problem of finding all the occurrences of a pattern in a text. We propose improved versions of the fast family of string matching algorithms based on hashing $q$-grams. The improvement consists of considering minimal values $q$ such that each $q$-grams of the pattern has a unique hash value. The new algorithms are fastest than algorithm of the HASH family for short patterns on large size alphabets.Comment: 14 page

A new family and structure for Commentz-Walter-style multiple-keyword pattern matching algorithms

In this paper, I present a new family of Commentz-Walter-style multiple-keyword string pattern matching algorithms. The algorithms share a common algorithmic skeleton, which is significantly optimized when compared to the original Commentz- Walter skeleton and subsequently derived improvements. The new skeleton is derived via correctness-preserving stepwise algorithmic improvements, in the Eindhoven style of programming

Generalised Pattern Matching Revisited

In the problem of $\texttt{Generalised Pattern Matching}\ (\texttt{GPM})$ [STOC'94, Muthukrishnan and Palem], we are given a text $T$ of length $n$ over an alphabet $\Sigma_T$, a pattern $P$ of length $m$ over an alphabet $\Sigma_P$, and a matching relationship $\subseteq \Sigma_T \times \Sigma_P$, and must return all substrings of $T$ that match $P$ (reporting) or the number of mismatches between each substring of $T$ of length $m$ and $P$ (counting). In this work, we improve over all previously known algorithms for this problem for various parameters describing the input instance: * $\mathcal{D}\,$ being the maximum number of characters that match a fixed character, * $\mathcal{S}\,$ being the number of pairs of matching characters, * $\mathcal{I}\,$ being the total number of disjoint intervals of characters that match the $m$ characters of the pattern $P$. At the heart of our new deterministic upper bounds for $\mathcal{D}\,$ and $\mathcal{S}\,$ lies a faster construction of superimposed codes, which solves an open problem posed in [FOCS'97, Indyk] and can be of independent interest. To conclude, we demonstrate first lower bounds for $\texttt{GPM}$. We start by showing that any deterministic or Monte Carlo algorithm for $\texttt{GPM}$ must use $\Omega(\mathcal{S})$ time, and then proceed to show higher lower bounds for combinatorial algorithms. These bounds show that our algorithms are almost optimal, unless a radically new approach is developed