Constrained shortest paths for QoS routing and path protection in communication networks.

The CSDP (k) problem requires the selection of a set of k > 1 link-disjoint paths with minimum total cost and with total delay bounded by a given upper bound. This problem arises in the context of provisioning paths in a network that could be used to provide resilience to link failures. Again we studied the LP relaxation of the ILP formulation of the problem from the primal perspective and proposed an approximation algorithm.We have studied certain combinatorial optimization problems that arise in the context of two important problems in computer communication networks: end-to-end Quality of Service (QoS) and fault tolerance. These problems can be modeled as constrained shortest path(s) selection problems on networks with each of their links associated with additive weights representing the cost, delay etc.The problems considered above assume that the network status is known and accurate. However, in real networks, this assumption is not realistic. So we considered the QoS route selection problem under inaccurate state information. Here the goal is to find a path with the highest probability that satisfies a given delay upper bound. We proposed a pseudo-polynomial time approximation algorithm, a fully polynomial time approximation scheme, and a strongly polynomial time heuristic for this problem.Finally we studied the constrained shortest path problem with multiple additive constraints. Using the LARAC algorithm as a building block and combining ideas from mathematical programming, we proposed a new approximation algorithm.First we studied the QoS single route selection problem, i.e., the constrained shortest path (CSP) problem. The goal of the CSP problem is to identify a minimum cost route which incurs a delay less than a specified bound. It can be formulated as an integer linear programming (ILP) problem which is computationally intractable. The LARAC algorithm reported in the literature is based on the dual of the linear programming relaxation of the ILP formulation and gives an approximate solution. We proposed two new approximation algorithms solving the dual problem. Next, we studied the CSP problem using the primal simplex method and exploiting certain structural properties of networks. This led to a novel approximation algorithm

The resource constrained shortest path problem with uncertain data: a robust formulation and optimal solution approach

International audienceThe Resource Constrained Shortest Path Problem (RCSP P) models several applications in the fields of transportation and communications. The classical problem supposes that the resource consumptions and the costs are certain and looks for the cheapest feasible path. These parameters are however hardly known with precision in real applications, so that the deterministic solution is likely to be infeasible or suboptimal. We address this issue by considering a robust counterpart of the RCSP P. We focus here on resource variation and model its variability through the uncertainty set defined by Bertismas and Sim (2003,2004), which can model the risk aversion of the decision maker through a budget of uncertainty. We solve the resulting problem to optimality through the well-known three phase approach dealing with bounds computation, network reduction and gap closing. In particular, we compute robust bounds on the resource consumption and cost by solving the robust shortest path problem and the dual robust Lagrangian relaxation, respectively. Dynamic programming is used to close the duality gap. Upper and lower bounds are used to reduce the dimension of the network and incorporated in the dynamic programming in order to fathom unpromising states. An extensive computational phase is carried out in order to asses the behavior of the defined strategy comparing its performance with the state-of-the-art. The results highlight the effectiveness of our approach in solving to optimality * 1 benchmark instances for RCSP P when Γ is not too large, tailored for the robust counterpart. For larger values of Γ, we show that the most efficient method combines deterministic preprocesing with the iterative algorithm from Bertsimas and Sim (2003). We also illustrate the failure probability of the robust solutions through Monte Carlo sampling

A linear programming based heuristic framework for min-max regret combinatorial optimization problems with interval costs

This work deals with a class of problems under interval data uncertainty, namely interval robust-hard problems, composed of interval data min-max regret generalizations of classical NP-hard combinatorial problems modeled as 0-1 integer linear programming problems. These problems are more challenging than other interval data min-max regret problems, as solely computing the cost of any feasible solution requires solving an instance of an NP-hard problem. The state-of-the-art exact algorithms in the literature are based on the generation of a possibly exponential number of cuts. As each cut separation involves the resolution of an NP-hard classical optimization problem, the size of the instances that can be solved efficiently is relatively small. To smooth this issue, we present a modeling technique for interval robust-hard problems in the context of a heuristic framework. The heuristic obtains feasible solutions by exploring dual information of a linearly relaxed model associated with the classical optimization problem counterpart. Computational experiments for interval data min-max regret versions of the restricted shortest path problem and the set covering problem show that our heuristic is able to find optimal or near-optimal solutions and also improves the primal bounds obtained by a state-of-the-art exact algorithm and a 2-approximation procedure for interval data min-max regret problems

Algorithm Engineering in Robust Optimization

Robust optimization is a young and emerging field of research having received a considerable increase of interest over the last decade. In this paper, we argue that the the algorithm engineering methodology fits very well to the field of robust optimization and yields a rewarding new perspective on both the current state of research and open research directions. To this end we go through the algorithm engineering cycle of design and analysis of concepts, development and implementation of algorithms, and theoretical and experimental evaluation. We show that many ideas of algorithm engineering have already been applied in publications on robust optimization. Most work on robust optimization is devoted to analysis of the concepts and the development of algorithms, some papers deal with the evaluation of a particular concept in case studies, and work on comparison of concepts just starts. What is still a drawback in many papers on robustness is the missing link to include the results of the experiments again in the design