8,142 research outputs found
Portfolio selection problems in practice: a comparison between linear and quadratic optimization models
Several portfolio selection models take into account practical limitations on
the number of assets to include and on their weights in the portfolio. We
present here a study of the Limited Asset Markowitz (LAM), of the Limited Asset
Mean Absolute Deviation (LAMAD) and of the Limited Asset Conditional
Value-at-Risk (LACVaR) models, where the assets are limited with the
introduction of quantity and cardinality constraints. We propose a completely
new approach for solving the LAM model, based on reformulation as a Standard
Quadratic Program and on some recent theoretical results. With this approach we
obtain optimal solutions both for some well-known financial data sets used by
several other authors, and for some unsolved large size portfolio problems. We
also test our method on five new data sets involving real-world capital market
indices from major stock markets. Our computational experience shows that,
rather unexpectedly, it is easier to solve the quadratic LAM model with our
algorithm, than to solve the linear LACVaR and LAMAD models with CPLEX, one of
the best commercial codes for mixed integer linear programming (MILP) problems.
Finally, on the new data sets we have also compared, using out-of-sample
analysis, the performance of the portfolios obtained by the Limited Asset
models with the performance provided by the unconstrained models and with that
of the official capital market indices
Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Portfolio Optimization
Financial portfolio optimization is a challenging problem. First, the problem is multiobjective (i.e.: minimize risk and maximize profit) and the objective functions are often multimodal and non smooth (e.g.: value at risk). Second, managers have often to face real-world constraints, which are typically non-linear. Hence, conventional optimization techniques, such as quadratic programming, cannot be used. Stochastic search heuristic can be an attractive alternative. In this paper, we propose a new multiobjective algorithm for portfolio optimization: DEMPO - Differential Evolution for Multiobjective Portfolio Optimization. The main advantage of this new algorithm is its generality, i.e., the ability to tackle a portfolio optimization task as it is, without simplifications. Our empirical results show the capability of our approach of obtaining highly accurate results in very reasonable runtime, in comparison with quadratic programming and another state-of-art search heuristic, the so-called NSGA II.Portfolio Optimization, Multiobjective, Real-world Constraints, Value at Risk, Expected Shortfall, Differential Evolution
Finding Multiple Solutions in Nonlinear Integer Programming with Algebraic Test-Sets
We explain how to compute all the solutions of a nonlinear
integer problem using the algebraic test-sets associated to a suitable
linear subproblem. These test-sets are obtained using Gröbner bases. The
main advantage of this method, compared to other available alternatives,
is its exactness within a quite good efficiency.Ministerio de EconomĂa y Competitividad MTM2016-75024-PMinisterio de EconomĂa y Competitividad MTM2016-74983-C2- 1-RJunta de AndalucĂa P12-FQM-269
OSQP: An Operator Splitting Solver for Quadratic Programs
We present a general-purpose solver for convex quadratic programs based on
the alternating direction method of multipliers, employing a novel operator
splitting technique that requires the solution of a quasi-definite linear
system with the same coefficient matrix at almost every iteration. Our
algorithm is very robust, placing no requirements on the problem data such as
positive definiteness of the objective function or linear independence of the
constraint functions. It can be configured to be division-free once an initial
matrix factorization is carried out, making it suitable for real-time
applications in embedded systems. In addition, our technique is the first
operator splitting method for quadratic programs able to reliably detect primal
and dual infeasible problems from the algorithm iterates. The method also
supports factorization caching and warm starting, making it particularly
efficient when solving parametrized problems arising in finance, control, and
machine learning. Our open-source C implementation OSQP has a small footprint,
is library-free, and has been extensively tested on many problem instances from
a wide variety of application areas. It is typically ten times faster than
competing interior-point methods, and sometimes much more when factorization
caching or warm start is used. OSQP has already shown a large impact with tens
of thousands of users both in academia and in large corporations
Recommended from our members
Software tools for stochastic programming: A Stochastic Programming Integrated Environment (SPInE)
SP models combine the paradigm of dynamic linear programming with
modelling of random parameters, providing optimal decisions which hedge
against future uncertainties. Advances in hardware as well as software
techniques and solution methods have made SP a viable optimisation tool.
We identify a growing need for modelling systems which support the creation
and investigation of SP problems. Our SPInE system integrates a number of
components which include a flexible modelling tool (based on stochastic
extensions of the algebraic modelling languages AMPL and MPL), stochastic
solvers, as well as special purpose scenario generators and database tools.
We introduce an asset/liability management model and illustrate how SPInE
can be used to create and process this model as a multistage SP application
- …