29 research outputs found

    Cardiac left atrium CT image segmentation for ablation guidance

    Full text link

    Computational modelling for congenital heart disease: how far are we from clinical translation?

    Get PDF
    Computational models of congenital heart disease (CHD) have become increasingly sophisticated over the last 20 years. They can provide an insight into complex flow phenomena, allow for testing devices into patient-specific anatomies (pre-CHD or post-CHD repair) and generate predictive data. This has been applied to different CHD scenarios, including patients with single ventricle, tetralogy of Fallot, aortic coarctation and transposition of the great arteries. Patient-specific simulations have been shown to be informative for preprocedural planning in complex cases, allowing for virtual stent deployment. Novel techniques such as statistical shape modelling can further aid in the morphological assessment of CHD, risk stratification of patients and possible identification of new 'shape biomarkers'. Cardiovascular statistical shape models can provide valuable insights into phenomena such as ventricular growth in tetralogy of Fallot, or morphological aortic arch differences in repaired coarctation. In a constant move towards more realistic simulations, models can also account for multiscale phenomena (eg, thrombus formation) and importantly include measures of uncertainty (ie, CIs around simulation results). While their potential to aid understanding of CHD, surgical/procedural decision-making and personalisation of treatments is undeniable, important elements are still lacking prior to clinical translation of computational models in the field of CHD, that is, large validation studies, cost-effectiveness evaluation and establishing possible improvements in patient outcomes

    3D MODELLING AND RAPID PROTOTYPING FOR CARDIOVASCULAR SURGICAL PLANNING – TWO CASE STUDIES

    Get PDF
    In the last years, cardiovascular diagnosis, surgical planning and intervention have taken advantages from 3D modelling and rapid prototyping techniques. The starting data for the whole process is represented by medical imagery, in particular, but not exclusively, computed tomography (CT) or multi-slice CT (MCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). On the medical imagery, regions of interest, i.e. heart chambers, valves, aorta, coronary vessels, etc., are segmented and converted into 3D models, which can be finally converted in physical replicas through 3D printing procedure. In this work, an overview on modern approaches for automatic and semiautomatic segmentation of medical imagery for 3D surface model generation is provided. The issue of accuracy check of surface models is also addressed, together with the critical aspects of converting digital models into physical replicas through 3D printing techniques. A patient-specific 3D modelling and printing procedure (Figure 1), for surgical planning in case of complex heart diseases was developed. The procedure was applied to two case studies, for which MCT scans of the chest are available. In the article, a detailed description on the implemented patient-specific modelling procedure is provided, along with a general discussion on the potentiality and future developments of personalized 3D modelling and printing for surgical planning and surgeons practice

    Generation of Myocardial Wall Surface Meshes from Segmented MRI

    Get PDF
    This paper presents a novel method for the generation of myocardial wall surface meshes from segmented 3D MR images, which typically have strongly anisotropic voxels. The method maps a premeshed sphere to the surface of the segmented object. The mapping is defined by the gradient field of the solution of the Laplace equation between the sphere and the surface of the object. The same algorithm is independently used to generate the surface meshes of the epicardium and endocardium of the four cardiac chambers. The generated meshes are smooth despite the strong voxel anisotropy, which is not the case for the marching cubes and related methods. While the proposed method generates more regular mesh triangles than the marching cubes and allows for a complete control of the number of triangles, the generated meshes are still close to the ones obtained by the marching cubes. The method was tested on 3D short-axis cardiac MR images with strongly anisotropic voxels in the long-axis direction. For the five tested subjects, the average in-slice distance between the meshes generated by the proposed method and by the marching cubes was 0.4 mm

    A dual propagation contours technique for semi-automated assessment of systolic and diastolic cardiac function by CMR

    Get PDF
    <p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Although cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is frequently performed to measure accurate LV volumes and ejection fractions, LV volume-time curves (VTC) derived ejection and filling rates are not routinely calculated due to lack of robust LV segmentation techniques. VTC derived peak filling rates can be used to accurately assess LV diastolic function, an important clinical parameter. We developed a novel geometry-independent dual-contour propagation technique, making use of LV endocardial contours manually drawn at end systole and end diastole, to compute VTC and measured LV ejection and filling rates in hypertensive patients and normal volunteers.</p> <p>Methods</p> <p>39 normal volunteers and 49 hypertensive patients underwent CMR. LV contours were manually drawn on all time frames in 18 normal volunteers. The dual-contour propagation algorithm was used to propagate contours throughout the cardiac cycle. The results were compared to those obtained with single-contour propagation (using either end-diastolic or end-systolic contours) and commercially available software. We then used the dual-contour propagation technique to measure peak ejection rate (PER) and peak early diastolic and late diastolic filling rates (ePFR and aPFR) in all normal volunteers and hypertensive patients.</p> <p>Results</p> <p>Compared to single-contour propagation methods and the commercial method, VTC by dual-contour propagation showed significantly better agreement with manually-derived VTC. Ejection and filling rates by dual-contour propagation agreed with manual (dual-contour – manual PER: -0.12 ± 0.08; ePFR: -0.07 ± 0.07; aPFR: 0.06 ± 0.03 EDV/s, all P = NS). However, the time for the manual method was ~4 hours per study versus ~7 minutes for dual-contour propagation. LV systolic function measured by LVEF and PER did not differ between normal volunteers and hypertensive patients. However, ePFR was lower in hypertensive patients vs. normal volunteers, while aPFR was higher, indicative of altered diastolic filling rates in hypertensive patients.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>Dual-propagated contours can accurately measure both systolic and diastolic volumetric indices that can be applied in a routine clinical CMR environment. With dual-contour propagation, the user interaction that is routinely performed to measure LVEF is leveraged to obtain additional clinically relevant parameters.</p

    Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications

    Get PDF
    [EN] The combination of computational models and biophysical simulations can help to interpret an array of experimental data and contribute to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of complex diseases such as cardiac arrhythmias. For this reason, three-dimensional (3D) cardiac computational modelling is currently a rising field of research. The advance of medical imaging technology over the last decades has allowed the evolution from generic to patient-specific 3D cardiac models that faithfully represent the anatomy and different cardiac features of a given alive subject. Here we analyse sixty representative 3D cardiac computational models developed and published during the last fifty years, describing their information sources, features, development methods and online availability. This paper also reviews the necessary components to build a 3D computational model of the heart aimed at biophysical simulation, paying especial attention to cardiac electrophysiology (EP), and the existing approaches to incorporate those components. We assess the challenges associated to the different steps of the building process, from the processing of raw clinical or biological data to the final application, including image segmentation, inclusion of substructures and meshing among others. We briefly outline the personalisation approaches that are currently available in 3D cardiac computational modelling. Finally, we present examples of several specific applications, mainly related to cardiac EP simulation and model-based image analysis, showing the potential usefulness of 3D cardiac computational modelling into clinical environments as a tool to aid in the prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac diseases.This work was partially supported by the "VI Plan Nacional de Investigacion Cientifica, Desarrollo e Innovacion Tecnologica" from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain (TIN2012-37546-C03-01 and TIN2011-28067) and the European Commission (European Regional Development Funds - ERDF - FEDER) and by "eTorso project" (GVA/2013-001404) from the Generalitat Valenciana (Spain). ALP is financially supported by the program "Ayudas para contratos predoctorales para la formacion de doctores" from the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad of Spain (BES-2013-064089).López Pérez, AD.; Sebastián Aguilar, R.; Ferrero De Loma-Osorio, JM. (2015). Three-dimensional cardiac computational modelling: methods, features and applications. BioMedical Engineering OnLine. 14(35):1-31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12938-015-0033-5S1311435Koushanpour E, Collings W: Validation and dynamic applications of an ellipsoid model of the left ventricle. J Appl Physiol 1966, 21: 1655–61.Ghista D, Sandler H: An analytic elastic-viscoelastic model for the shape and the forces in the left ventricle. J Biomech 1969, 2: 35–47.Janz RF, Grimm AF: Finite-Element Model for the Mechanical Behavior of the Left Ventricle: prediction of deformation in the potassium-arrested rat heart. Circ Res 1972, 30: 244–52.Van den Broek JHJM, Van den Broek MHLM: Application of an ellipsoidal heart model in studying left ventricular contractions. J Biomech 1980, 13: 493–503.Colli Franzone P, Guerri L, Pennacchio M, Taccardi B: Spread of excitation in 3-D models of the anisotropic cardiac tissue. II. Effects of fiber architecture and ventricular geometry. Math Biosci 1998, 147: 131–71.Kerckhoffs RCP, Bovendeerd PHM, Kotte JCS, Prinzen FW, Smits K, Arts T: Homogeneity of cardiac contraction despite physiological asynchrony of depolarization: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 2003, 31: 536–47.Sermesant M, Moireau P, Camara O, Sainte-Marie J, Andriantsimiavona R, Cimrman R, et al.: Cardiac function estimation from MRI using a heart model and data assimilation: advances and difficulties. Med Image Anal 2006, 10: 642–56.Okajima M, Fujino T, Kobayashi T, Yamada K: Computer simulation of the propagation process in excitation of the ventricles. Circ Res 1968, 23: 203–11.Horan LG, Hand RC, Johnson JC, Sridharan MR, Rankin TB, Flowers NC: A theoretical examination of ventricular repolarization and the secondary T wave. Circ Res 1978, 42: 750–7.Miller WT, Geselowitz DB: Simulation studies of the electrocardiogram. I. The normal heart. Circ Res 1978, 43: 301–15.Vetter FJ, McCulloch AD: Three-dimensional analysis of regional cardiac function: a model of rabbit ventricular anatomy. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 1998, 69: 157–83.Nielsen PMF, LeGrice IJ, Smaill BH, Hunter PJ: Mathematical model of geometry and fibrous structure of the heart. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1991, 260: H1365–78.Stevens C, Remme E, LeGrice I, Hunter P: Ventricular mechanics in diastole: material parameter sensitivity. J Biomech 2003, 36: 737–48.Aoki M, Okamoto Y, Musha T, Harumi KI: Three-dimensional simulation of the ventricular depolarization and repolarization processes and body surface potentials: normal heart and bundle branch block. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1987, 34: 454–62.Thakor NV, Eisenman LN: Three-dimensional computer model of the heart: fibrillation induced by extrastimulation. Comput Biomed Res 1989, 22: 532–45.Freudenberg J, Schiemann T, Tiede U, Höhne KH: Simulation of cardiac excitation patterns in a three-dimensional anatomical heart atlas. Comput Biol Med 2000, 30: 191–205.Trunk P, Mocnik J, Trobec R, Gersak B: 3D heart model for computer simulations in cardiac surgery. Comput Biol Med 2007, 37: 1398–403.Siregar P, Sinteff JP, Julen N, Le Beux P: An interactive 3D anisotropic cellular automata model of the heart. Comput Biomed Res 1998, 31: 323–47.Harrild DM, Henriquez CS: A computer model of normal conduction in the human atria. Circ Res 2000, 87: e25–36.Bodin ON, Kuz’min AV: Synthesis of a realistic model of the surface of the heart. Biomed Eng (NY) 2006, 40: 280–3.Ruiz-Villa CA, Tobón C, Rodríguez JF, Ferrero JM, Hornero F, Saíz J: Influence of atrial dilatation in the generation of re-entries caused by ectopic activity in the left atrium. Comput Cardiol 2009, 36: 457–60.Blanc O, Virag N, Vesin JM, Kappenberger L: A computer model of human atria with reasonable computation load and realistic anatomical properties. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2001, 48: 1229–37.Zemlin CW, Herzel H, Ho SY, Panfilov AV: A realistic and efficient model of excitation propagation in the human atria. In Comput Simul Exp Assess Card Electrophysiol. Edited by: Virag N, Kappenberger L, Blanc O. Futura Publishing Company, Inc, Arkmonk, New York; 2001:29–34.Seemann G, Höper C, Sachse FB, Dössel O, Holden AV, Zhang H: Heterogeneous three-dimensional anatomical and electrophysiological model of human atria. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2006, 364: 1465–81.Zhao J, Butters TD, Zhang H, LeGrice IJ, Sands GB, Smaill BH: Image-based model of atrial anatomy and electrical activation: a computational platform for investigating atrial arrhythmia. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 18–27.Creswell LL, Wyers SG, Pirolo JS, Perman WH, Vannier MW, Pasque MK: Mathematical modeling of the heart using magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1992, 11: 581–9.Lorange M, Gulrajani RM: A computer heart model incorporating anisotropic propagation: I. Model construction and simulation of normal activation. J Electrocardiol 1993, 26: 245–61.Winslow RL, Scollan DF, Holmes A, Yung CK, Zhang J, Jafri MS: Electrophysiological modeling of cardiac ventricular function: from cell to organ. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 2000, 2: 119–55.Virag N, Jacquemet V, Henriquez CS, Zozor S, Blanc O, Vesin JM, et al.: Study of atrial arrhythmias in a computer model based on magnetic resonance images of human atria. Chaos 2002, 12: 754–63.Helm PA, Tseng HJ, Younes L, McVeigh ER, Winslow RL: Ex vivo 3D diffusion tensor imaging and quantification of cardiac laminar structure. Magn Reson Med 2005, 54: 850–9.Arevalo HJ, Helm PA, Trayanova NA: Development of a model of the infarcted canine heart that predicts arrhythmia generation from specific cardiac geometry and scar distribution. Comput Cardiol 2008, 35: 497–500.Plotkowiak M, Rodriguez B, Plank G, Schneider JE, Gavaghan D, Kohl P, et al.: High performance computer simulations of cardiac electrical function based on high resolution MRI datasets. In Int Conf Comput Sci 2008, LNCS 5101. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2008:571–80.Heidenreich EA, Ferrero JM, Doblaré M, Rodríguez JF: Adaptive macro finite elements for the numerical solution of monodomain equations in cardiac electrophysiology. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38: 2331–45.Gurev V, Lee T, Constantino J, Arevalo H, Trayanova NA: Models of cardiac electromechanics based on individual hearts imaging data: Image-based electromechanical models of the heart. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 2011, 10: 295–306.Deng D, Jiao P, Ye X, Xia L: An image-based model of the whole human heart with detailed anatomical structure and fiber orientation. Comput Math Methods Med 2012, 2012: 16.Aslanidi OV, Nikolaidou T, Zhao J, Smaill BH, Gilbert SH, Holden AV, et al.: Application of micro-computed tomography with iodine staining to cardiac imaging, segmentation, and computational model development. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 8–17.Haddad R, Clarysse P, Orkisz M, Croisille P, Revel D, Magnin IE: A realistic anthropomorphic numerical model of the beating heart. In Funct Imaging Model Heart 2005, LNCS 3504. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2005:384–93.Appleton B, Wei Q, Liu N, Xia L, Crozier S, Liu F, et al.: An electrical heart model incorporating real geometry and motion. In 27th Annu Int Conf Eng Med Biol Soc (IEEE-EMBS 2005). IEEE, Shanghai, China; 2006:345–8.Niederer S, Rhode K, Razavi R, Smith N: The importance of model parameters and boundary conditions in whole organ models of cardiac contraction. In Funct Imaging Model Heart 2009, LNCS 5528. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:348–56.Yang G, Toumoulin C, Coatrieux JL, Shu H, Luo L, Boulmier D: A 3D static heart model from a MSCT data set. In 27th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (IEEE-EMBS 2005). IEEE, Shangai, China; 2006:5499–502.Romero D, Sebastian R, Bijnens BH, Zimmerman V, Boyle PM, Vigmond EJ, et al.: Effects of the purkinje system and cardiac geometry on biventricular pacing: a model study. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38: 1388–98.Lorenzo-Valdés M, Sanchez-Ortiz GI, Mohiaddin R, Rueckert D: Atlas-based segmentation and tracking of 3D cardiac MR images using non-rigid registration. In Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2002, LNCS 2488. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2002:642–50.Ordas S, Oubel E, Sebastian R, Frangi AF: Computational anatomy atlas of the heart. In 5th Int Symp Image Signal Process Anal (ISPA 2007). IEEE, Istanbul, Turkey; 2007:338–42.Burton RAB, Plank G, Schneider JE, Grau V, Ahammer H, Keeling SL, et al.: Three-dimensional models of individual cardiac histoanatomy: tools and challenges. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2006, 1080: 301–19.Plank G, Burton RAB, Hales P, Bishop M, Mansoori T, Bernabeu MO, et al.: Generation of histo-anatomically representative models of the individual heart: tools and application. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 2257–92.Bishop MJ, Plank G, Burton RAB, Schneider JE, Gavaghan DJ, Grau V, et al.: Development of an anatomically detailed MRI-derived rabbit ventricular model and assessment of its impact on simulations of electrophysiological function. Am J Physiol - Heart Circ Physiol 2010, 298: H699–718.Ecabert O, Peters J, Schramm H, Lorenz C, von Berg J, Walker MJ, et al.: Automatic model-based segmentation of the heart in CT images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2008, 27: 1189–201.Ecabert O, Peters J, Walker MJ, Ivanc T, Lorenz C, von Berg J, et al.: Segmentation of the heart and great vessels in CT images using a model-based adaptation framework. Med Image Anal 2011, 15: 863–76.Schulte RF, Sands GB, Sachse FB, Dössel O, Pullan AJ: Creation of a human heart model and its customisation using ultrasound images. Biomed Tech Eng 2001, 46: 26–8.Wenk JF, Zhang Z, Cheng G, Malhotra D, Acevedo-Bolton G, Burger M, et al.: First finite element model of the left ventricle with mitral valve: insights into ischemic mitral regurgitation. Ann Thorac Surg 2010, 89: 1546–53.Frangi AF, Rueckert D, Schnabel JA, Niessen WJ: Automatic construction of multiple-object three-dimensional statistical shape models: application to cardiac modeling. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002, 21: 1151–66.Hoogendoorn C, Duchateau N, Sánchez-Quintana D, Whitmarsh T, Sukno FM, De Craene M, et al.: A high-resolution atlas and statistical model of the human heart from multislice CT. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 28–44.Vadakkumpadan F, Rantner LJ, Tice B, Boyle P, Prassl AJ, Vigmond E, et al.: Image-based models of cardiac structure with applications in arrhythmia and defibrillation studies. J Electrocardiol 2009, 42: 157.Perperidis D, Mohiaddin R, Rueckert D: Construction of a 4D statistical atlas of the cardiac anatomy and its use in classification. In Med Image Comput Comput Interv 2005, LNCS 3750. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2005:402–10.Lötjönen J, Kivistö S, Koikkalainen J, Smutek D, Lauerma K: Statistical shape model of atria, ventricles and epicardium from short- and long-axis MR images. Med Image Anal 2004, 8: 371–86.Lorenz C, von Berg J: A comprehensive shape model of the heart. Med Image Anal 2006, 10: 657–70.Mansoori T, Plank G, Burton R, Schneider J, Khol P, Gavaghan D, et al.: An iterative method for registration of high-resolution cardiac histoanatomical and MRI images. In 4th IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging: From Nano to Macro (ISBI 2007). IEEE, Arlington, VA (USA); 2007:572–5.Gibb M, Burton RAB, Bollensdorff C, Afonso C, Mansoori T, Schotten U, et al.: Resolving the three-dimensional histology of the heart. In Comput Methods Syst Biol - Lect Notes Comput Sci 7605. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2012:2–16.Burton RAB, Lee P, Casero R, Garny A, Siedlecka U, Schneider JE, et al.: Three-dimensional histology: tools and application to quantitative assessment of cell-type distribution in rabbit heart. Europace 2014,16(Suppl 4):iv86–95.Niederer SA, Shetty AK, Plank G, Bostock J, Razavi R, Smith NP, et al.: Biophysical modeling to simulate the response to multisite left ventricular stimulation using a quadripolar pacing lead. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol 2012, 35: 204–14.Weese J, Groth A, Nickisch H, Barschdorf H, Weber FM, Velut J, et al.: Generating anatomical models of the heart and the aorta from medical images for personalized physiological simulations. Med Biol Eng Comput 2013, 51: 1209–19.Gibb M, Bishop M, Burton R, Kohl P, Grau V, Plank G, et al.: The role of blood vessels in rabbit propagation dynamics and cardiac arrhythmias. In Funct Imaging Model Heart - FIMH 2009, LNCS 5528. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:268–76.Prassl AJ, Kickinger F, Ahammer H, Grau V, Schneider JE, Hofer E, et al.: Automatically generated, anatomically accurate meshes for cardiac electrophysiology problems. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2009, 56: 1318–30.Dux-Santoy L, Sebastian R, Felix-Rodriguez J, Ferrero JM, Saiz J: Interaction of specialized cardiac conduction system with antiarrhythmic drugs: a simulation study. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011, 58: 3475–8.Lamata P, Niederer S, Nordsletten D, Barber DC, Roy I, Hose DR, et al.: An accurate, fast and robust method to generate patient-specific cubic Hermite meshes. Med Image Anal 2011, 15: 801–13.Pathmanathan P, Cooper J, Fletcher A, Mirams G, Murray P, Osborne J, et al.: A computational study of discrete mechanical tissue models. Phys Biol 2009, 6: 036001.Niederer SA, Kerfoot E, Benson AP, Bernabeu MO, Bernus O, Bradley C, et al.: Verification of cardiac tissue electrophysiology simulators using an N-version benchmark. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2011, 369: 4331–51.Ten Tusscher KHWJ, Panfilov AV: Cell model for efficient simulation of wave propagation in human ventricular tissue under normal and pathological conditions. Phys Med Biol 2006, 51: 6141–56.LeGrice I, Smaill B, Chai L, Edgar S, Gavin J, Hunter P: Laminar structure of the heart: ventricular myocyte arrangement and connective tissue architecture in the dog. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1995, 269: H571–82.Anderson RH, Smerup M, Sanchez-Quintana D, Loukas M, Lunkenheimer PP: The three-dimensional arrangement of the myocytes in the ventricular walls. Clin Anat 2009, 22: 64–76.Clerc L: Directional differences of impulse spread in trabecular muscle from mammalian heart. J Physiol 1976, 255: 335–46.Streeter DD Jr, Spotnitz HM, Patel DP, Ross J Jr, Sonnenblick EH: Fiber orientation in the canine left ventricle during diastole and systole. Circ Res 1969, 24: 339–47.Scollan D, Holmes A, Winslow R, Forder J: Histological validation of myocardial microstructure obtained from diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1998, 275: H2308–18.Hsu EW, Muzikant AL, Matulevicius SA, Penland RC, Henriquez CS: Magnetic resonance myocardial fiber-orientation mapping with direct histological correlation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 1998, 274: H1627–34.Holmes AA, Scollan DF, Winslow RL: Direct histological validation of diffusion tensor MRI in formaldehyde-fixed myocardium. Magn Reson Med 2000, 44: 157–61.Sermesant M, Forest C, Pennec X, Delingette H, Ayache N: Deformable biomechanical models: application to 4D cardiac image analysis. Med Image Anal 2003, 7: 475–88.Peyrat JM, Sermesant M, Pennec X, Delingette H, Xu C, McVeigh ER, et al.: A computational framework for the statistical analysis of cardiac diffusion tensors: application to a small database of canine hearts. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2007, 26: 1500–14.Toussaint N, Sermesant M, Stoeck CT, Kozerke S, Batchelor PG: In vivo human 3D cardiac fibre architecture: reconstruction using curvilinear interpolation of diffusion tensor images. Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv 2010,13(Pt 1):418–25.Toussaint N, Stoeck CT, Schaeffter T, Kozerke S, Sermesant M, Batchelor PG: In vivo human cardiac fibre architecture estimation using shape-based diffusion tensor processing. Med Image Anal 2013, 17: 1243–55.Bishop MJ, Hales P, Plank G, Gavaghan DJ, Scheider J, Grau V: Comparison of rule-based and DTMRI-derived fibre architecture in a whole rat ventricular computational model. In Funct Imaging Model Heart 2009, LNCS 5528. Springer–Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg; 2009:87–96.Bayer JD, Blake RC, Plank G, Trayanova NA: A novel rule-based algorithm for assigning myocardial fiber orientation to computational heart models. Ann Biomed Eng 2012, 40: 2243–54.Dobrzynski H, Anderson RH, Atkinson A, Borbas Z, D’Souza A, Fraser JF, et al.: Structure, function and clinical relevance of the cardiac conduction system, including the atrioventricular ring and outflow tract tissues. Pharmacol Ther 2013, 139: 260–88.Tranum-Jensen J, Wilde AA, Vermeulen JT, Janse MJ: Morphology of electrophysiologically identified junctions between Purkinje fibers and ventricular muscle in rabbit and pig hearts. Circ Res 1991, 69: 429–37.Boyle PM, Deo M, Plank G, Vigmond EJ: Purkinje-mediated effects in the response of quiescent ventricles to defibrillation shocks. Ann Biomed Eng 2010, 38: 456–68.Behradfar E, Nygren A, Vigmond EJ: The role of Purkinje-myocardial coupling during ventricular arrhythmia: a modeling study. PLoS One 2014., 9: Article ID e88000DiFrancesco D, Noble D: A model of cardiac electrical activity incorporating ionic pumps and concentration changes. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 1985, 307: 353–98.Stewart P, Aslanidi OV, Noble D, Noble PJ, Boyett MR, Zhang H: Mathematical models of the electrical action potential of Purkinje fibre cells. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 2009, 367: 2225–55.Li P, Rudy Y: A model of canine purkinje cell electrophysiology and Ca(2+) cycling: rate dependence, triggered activity, and comparison to ventricular myocytes. Circ Res 2011, 109: 71–9.Chinchapatnam P, Rhode KS, Ginks M, Mansi T, Peyrat JM, Lambiase P, et al.: Estimation of volumetric myocardial apparent conductivity from endocardial electro-anatomical mapping. In 31st Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC 2009). IEEE, Minneapolis, MN (USA); 2009:2907–10.Durrer D, Van Dam RT, Freud GE, Janse MJ, Meijler FL, Arzbaecher RC: Total excitation of the isolated human heart. Circulation 1970, 41: 899–912.Pollard AE, Barr RC: Computer simulations of activation in an anatomically based model of the human ventricular conduction system. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1991, 38: 982–96.Abboud S, Berenfeld O, Sadeh D: Simulation of high-resolution QRS complex using a ventricular model with a fractal conduction system. Effects of ischemia on high-frequency QRS potentials. Circ Res 1991, 68: 1751–60.Sebastian R, Zimmerman V, Romero D, Sanchez-Quintana D, Frangi AF: Characterization and modeling of the peripheral cardiac conduction system. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2013, 32: 45–55.Bordas R, Gillow K, Lou Q, Efimov IR, Gavaghan D, Kohl P, et al.: Rabbit-specific ventricular model of cardiac electrophysiological function including specialized conduction system. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2011, 107: 90–100.Stephenson RS, Boyett MR, Hart G, Nikolaidou T, Cai X, Corno AF, et al.: Contrast enhanced micro-computed tomography resolves the 3-dimensional morphology of the cardiac conduction system in mammalian hearts. PLoS One 2012., 7: Article ID e35299Berenfeld O, Jalife J: Purkinje-Muscle reentry as a mechanism of polymorphic ventricular arrhythmias in a 3-dimensional model of the ventricles. Circ Res 1998, 82: 1063–77.Azzouzi A, Coudière Y, Turpault R, Zemzemi N: A mathematical model of the Purkinje-muscle junctions. Math Biosci Eng MBE 2011, 8: 915–30.Dux-Santoy L, Sebastian R, Rodriguez JF, Ferrero JM: Modeling the different sections of the cardiac conduction system to obtain realistic electrocardiograms. In 35th Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc (EMBC 2013). IEEE, Osaka, Japan; 2013:6846–9.Cardenes R, Sebastian R, Berruezo A, Camara O: Inverse

    Coronary Artery Segmentation and Motion Modelling

    No full text
    Conventional coronary artery bypass surgery requires invasive sternotomy and the use of a cardiopulmonary bypass, which leads to long recovery period and has high infectious potential. Totally endoscopic coronary artery bypass (TECAB) surgery based on image guided robotic surgical approaches have been developed to allow the clinicians to conduct the bypass surgery off-pump with only three pin holes incisions in the chest cavity, through which two robotic arms and one stereo endoscopic camera are inserted. However, the restricted field of view of the stereo endoscopic images leads to possible vessel misidentification and coronary artery mis-localization. This results in 20-30% conversion rates from TECAB surgery to the conventional approach. We have constructed patient-specific 3D + time coronary artery and left ventricle motion models from preoperative 4D Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) scans. Through temporally and spatially aligning this model with the intraoperative endoscopic views of the patient's beating heart, this work assists the surgeon to identify and locate the correct coronaries during the TECAB precedures. Thus this work has the prospect of reducing the conversion rate from TECAB to conventional coronary bypass procedures. This thesis mainly focus on designing segmentation and motion tracking methods of the coronary arteries in order to build pre-operative patient-specific motion models. Various vessel centreline extraction and lumen segmentation algorithms are presented, including intensity based approaches, geometric model matching method and morphology-based method. A probabilistic atlas of the coronary arteries is formed from a group of subjects to facilitate the vascular segmentation and registration procedures. Non-rigid registration framework based on a free-form deformation model and multi-level multi-channel large deformation diffeomorphic metric mapping are proposed to track the coronary motion. The methods are applied to 4D CTA images acquired from various groups of patients and quantitatively evaluated

    3D right ventricular endocardium segmentation in cardiac magnetic resonance images by using a new inter-modality statistical shape modelling method

    Get PDF
    Objective Statistical shape modelling (SSM) has established as a powerful method for segmenting the left ventricle in cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) images However, applying them to segment the right ventricle (RV) is not straightforward because of the complex structure of this chamber. Our aim was to develop a new inter-modality SSM-based approach to detect the RV endocardium in CMR data. Methods Real-time transthoracic 3D echocardiographic (3DE) images of 219 retrospective patients were used to populate a large database containing 4347 3D RV surfaces and train a model. The initial position, orientation and scale of the model in the CMR stack were semi-automatically derived. The detection process consisted in iteratively deforming the model to match endocardial borders in each CMR plane until convergence was reached. Clinical values obtained with the presented SSM method were compared with gold-standard (GS) corresponding parameters. Results CMR images of 50 patients with different pathologies were used to test the proposed segmentation method. Average processing time was 2 min (including manual initialization) per patient. High correlations (r2 > 0.76) and not significant bias (Bland-Altman analysis) were observed when evaluating clinical parameters. Quantitative analysis showed high values of Dice coefficient (0.87 ± 0.03), acceptable Hausdorff distance (9.35 ± 1.51 mm) and small point-to-surface distance (1.91 ± 0.26 mm). Conclusion A novel SSM-based approach to segment the RV endocardium in CMR scans by using a model trained on 3DE-derived RV endocardial surfaces, was proposed. This inter-modality technique proved to be rapid when segmenting the RV endocardium with an accurate anatomical delineation, in particular in apical and basal regions
    corecore