10,657 research outputs found
Automated Termination Proofs for Logic Programs by Term Rewriting
There are two kinds of approaches for termination analysis of logic programs:
"transformational" and "direct" ones. Direct approaches prove termination
directly on the basis of the logic program. Transformational approaches
transform a logic program into a term rewrite system (TRS) and then analyze
termination of the resulting TRS instead. Thus, transformational approaches
make all methods previously developed for TRSs available for logic programs as
well. However, the applicability of most existing transformations is quite
restricted, as they can only be used for certain subclasses of logic programs.
(Most of them are restricted to well-moded programs.) In this paper we improve
these transformations such that they become applicable for any definite logic
program. To simulate the behavior of logic programs by TRSs, we slightly modify
the notion of rewriting by permitting infinite terms. We show that our
transformation results in TRSs which are indeed suitable for automated
termination analysis. In contrast to most other methods for termination of
logic programs, our technique is also sound for logic programming without occur
check, which is typically used in practice. We implemented our approach in the
termination prover AProVE and successfully evaluated it on a large collection
of examples.Comment: 49 page
12th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2012) : WST 2012, February 19–23, 2012, Obergurgl, Austria / ed. by Georg Moser
This volume contains the proceedings of the 12th International Workshop on Termination (WST 2012), to be held February 19–23, 2012 in Obergurgl, Austria. The goal of the Workshop on Termination is to be a venue for presentation and discussion of all topics in and around termination. In this way, the workshop tries to bridge the gaps between different communities interested and active in research in and around termination. The 12th International Workshop on Termination in Obergurgl continues the successful workshops held in St. Andrews (1993), La Bresse (1995), Ede (1997), Dagstuhl (1999), Utrecht (2001), Valencia (2003), Aachen (2004), Seattle (2006), Paris (2007), Leipzig (2009), and Edinburgh (2010). The 12th International Workshop on Termination did welcome contributions on all aspects of termination and complexity analysis. Contributions from the imperative, constraint, functional, and logic programming communities, and papers investigating applications of complexity or termination (for example in program transformation or theorem proving) were particularly welcome. We did receive 18 submissions which all were accepted. Each paper was assigned two reviewers. In addition to these 18 contributed talks, WST 2012, hosts three invited talks by Alexander Krauss, Martin Hofmann, and Fausto Spoto
Polytool: polynomial interpretations as a basis for termination analysis of Logic programs
Our goal is to study the feasibility of porting termination analysis
techniques developed for one programming paradigm to another paradigm. In this
paper, we show how to adapt termination analysis techniques based on polynomial
interpretations - very well known in the context of term rewrite systems (TRSs)
- to obtain new (non-transformational) ter- mination analysis techniques for
definite logic programs (LPs). This leads to an approach that can be seen as a
direct generalization of the traditional techniques in termination analysis of
LPs, where linear norms and level mappings are used. Our extension general-
izes these to arbitrary polynomials. We extend a number of standard concepts
and results on termination analysis to the context of polynomial
interpretations. We also propose a constraint-based approach for automatically
generating polynomial interpretations that satisfy the termination conditions.
Based on this approach, we implemented a new tool, called Polytool, for
automatic termination analysis of LPs
Acceptability with general orderings
We present a new approach to termination analysis of logic programs. The
essence of the approach is that we make use of general orderings (instead of
level mappings), like it is done in transformational approaches to logic
program termination analysis, but we apply these orderings directly to the
logic program and not to the term-rewrite system obtained through some
transformation. We define some variants of acceptability, based on general
orderings, and show how they are equivalent to LD-termination. We develop a
demand driven, constraint-based approach to verify these
acceptability-variants.
The advantage of the approach over standard acceptability is that in some
cases, where complex level mappings are needed, fairly simple orderings may be
easily generated. The advantage over transformational approaches is that it
avoids the transformation step all together.
{\bf Keywords:} termination analysis, acceptability, orderings.Comment: To appear in "Computational Logic: From Logic Programming into the
Future
Finite Countermodel Based Verification for Program Transformation (A Case Study)
Both automatic program verification and program transformation are based on
program analysis. In the past decade a number of approaches using various
automatic general-purpose program transformation techniques (partial deduction,
specialization, supercompilation) for verification of unreachability properties
of computing systems were introduced and demonstrated. On the other hand, the
semantics based unfold-fold program transformation methods pose themselves
diverse kinds of reachability tasks and try to solve them, aiming at improving
the semantics tree of the program being transformed. That means some
general-purpose verification methods may be used for strengthening program
transformation techniques. This paper considers the question how finite
countermodels for safety verification method might be used in Turchin's
supercompilation method. We extract a number of supercompilation sub-algorithms
trying to solve reachability problems and demonstrate use of an external
countermodel finder for solving some of the problems.Comment: In Proceedings VPT 2015, arXiv:1512.0221
Automatic Verification of Transactions on an Object-Oriented Database
In the context of the object-oriented data model, a compiletime approach is given that provides for a significant reduction of the amount of run-time transaction overhead due to integrity constraint checking. The higher-order logic Isabelle theorem prover is used to automatically prove which constraints might, or might not be violated by a given transaction in a manner analogous to the one used by Sheard and Stemple (1989) for the relational data model. A prototype transaction verification tool has been implemented, which automates the semantic mappings and generates proof goals for Isabelle. Test results are discussed to illustrate the effectiveness of our approach
State space c-reductions for concurrent systems in rewriting logic
We present c-reductions, a state space reduction technique.
The rough idea is to exploit some equivalence relation on states (possibly capturing system regularities) that preserves behavioral properties, and explore the induced quotient system. This is done by means of a canonizer
function, which maps each state into a (non necessarily unique) canonical representative of its equivalence class. The approach exploits the expressiveness of rewriting logic and its realization in Maude to enjoy several advantages over similar approaches: exibility and simplicity in
the definition of the reductions (supporting not only traditional symmetry reductions, but also name reuse and name abstraction); reasoning support for checking and proving correctness of the reductions; and automatization
of the reduction infrastructure via Maude's meta-programming
features. The approach has been validated over a set of representative case studies, exhibiting comparable results with respect to other tools
- …