1,385 research outputs found
A simple and optimal ancestry labeling scheme for trees
We present a ancestry labeling scheme for trees. The
problem was first presented by Kannan et al. [STOC 88'] along with a simple solution. Motivated by applications to XML files, the label size was
improved incrementally over the course of more than 20 years by a series of
papers. The last, due to Fraigniaud and Korman [STOC 10'], presented an
asymptotically optimal labeling scheme using
non-trivial tree-decomposition techniques. By providing a framework
generalizing interval based labeling schemes, we obtain a simple, yet
asymptotically optimal solution to the problem. Furthermore, our labeling
scheme is attained by a small modification of the original solution.Comment: 12 pages, 1 figure. To appear at ICALP'1
Dynamic and Multi-functional Labeling Schemes
We investigate labeling schemes supporting adjacency, ancestry, sibling, and
connectivity queries in forests. In the course of more than 20 years, the
existence of labeling schemes supporting each of these
functions was proven, with the most recent being ancestry [Fraigniaud and
Korman, STOC '10]. Several multi-functional labeling schemes also enjoy lower
or upper bounds of or
respectively. Notably an upper bound of for
adjacency+siblings and a lower bound of for each of the
functions siblings, ancestry, and connectivity [Alstrup et al., SODA '03]. We
improve the constants hidden in the -notation. In particular we show a lower bound for connectivity+ancestry and
connectivity+siblings, as well as an upper bound of for connectivity+adjacency+siblings by altering existing
methods.
In the context of dynamic labeling schemes it is known that ancestry requires
bits [Cohen, et al. PODS '02]. In contrast, we show upper and lower
bounds on the label size for adjacency, siblings, and connectivity of
bits, and to support all three functions. There exist efficient
adjacency labeling schemes for planar, bounded treewidth, bounded arboricity
and interval graphs. In a dynamic setting, we show a lower bound of
for each of those families.Comment: 17 pages, 5 figure
Distance labeling schemes for trees
We consider distance labeling schemes for trees: given a tree with nodes,
label the nodes with binary strings such that, given the labels of any two
nodes, one can determine, by looking only at the labels, the distance in the
tree between the two nodes.
A lower bound by Gavoille et. al. (J. Alg. 2004) and an upper bound by Peleg
(J. Graph Theory 2000) establish that labels must use
bits\footnote{Throughout this paper we use for .}. Gavoille et.
al. (ESA 2001) show that for very small approximate stretch, labels use
bits. Several other papers investigate various
variants such as, for example, small distances in trees (Alstrup et. al.,
SODA'03).
We improve the known upper and lower bounds of exact distance labeling by
showing that bits are needed and that bits are sufficient. We also give ()-stretch labeling
schemes using bits for constant .
()-stretch labeling schemes with polylogarithmic label size have
previously been established for doubling dimension graphs by Talwar (STOC
2004).
In addition, we present matching upper and lower bounds for distance labeling
for caterpillars, showing that labels must have size . For simple paths with nodes and edge weights in , we show that
labels must have size
Labeling Schemes with Queries
We study the question of ``how robust are the known lower bounds of labeling
schemes when one increases the number of consulted labels''. Let be a
function on pairs of vertices. An -labeling scheme for a family of graphs
\cF labels the vertices of all graphs in \cF such that for every graph
G\in\cF and every two vertices , the value can be inferred
by merely inspecting the labels of and .
This paper introduces a natural generalization: the notion of -labeling
schemes with queries, in which the value can be inferred by inspecting
not only the labels of and but possibly the labels of some additional
vertices. We show that inspecting the label of a single additional vertex (one
{\em query}) enables us to reduce the label size of many labeling schemes
significantly
Labeling Schemes for Bounded Degree Graphs
We investigate adjacency labeling schemes for graphs of bounded degree
. In particular, we present an optimal (up to an additive
constant) adjacency labeling scheme for bounded degree trees.
The latter scheme is derived from a labeling scheme for bounded degree
outerplanar graphs. Our results complement a similar bound recently obtained
for bounded depth trees [Fraigniaud and Korman, SODA 10], and may provide new
insights for closing the long standing gap for adjacency in trees [Alstrup and
Rauhe, FOCS 02]. We also provide improved labeling schemes for bounded degree
planar graphs. Finally, we use combinatorial number systems and present an
improved adjacency labeling schemes for graphs of bounded degree with
Near-optimal labeling schemes for nearest common ancestors
We consider NCA labeling schemes: given a rooted tree , label the nodes of
with binary strings such that, given the labels of any two nodes, one can
determine, by looking only at the labels, the label of their nearest common
ancestor.
For trees with nodes we present upper and lower bounds establishing that
labels of size , are both sufficient and
necessary. (All logarithms in this paper are in base 2.)
Alstrup, Bille, and Rauhe (SIDMA'05) showed that ancestor and NCA labeling
schemes have labels of size . Our lower bound
increases this to for NCA labeling schemes. Since
Fraigniaud and Korman (STOC'10) established that labels in ancestor labeling
schemes have size , our new lower bound separates
ancestor and NCA labeling schemes. Our upper bound improves the
upper bound by Alstrup, Gavoille, Kaplan and Rauhe (TOCS'04), and our
theoretical result even outperforms some recent experimental studies by Fischer
(ESA'09) where variants of the same NCA labeling scheme are shown to all have
labels of size approximately
Adjacency labeling schemes and induced-universal graphs
We describe a way of assigning labels to the vertices of any undirected graph
on up to vertices, each composed of bits, such that given the
labels of two vertices, and no other information regarding the graph, it is
possible to decide whether or not the vertices are adjacent in the graph. This
is optimal, up to an additive constant, and constitutes the first improvement
in almost 50 years of an bound of Moon. As a consequence, we
obtain an induced-universal graph for -vertex graphs containing only
vertices, which is optimal up to a multiplicative constant,
solving an open problem of Vizing from 1968. We obtain similar tight results
for directed graphs, tournaments and bipartite graphs
- …