3,773 research outputs found
Optimal control formulation of transition path problems for Markov Jump Processes
Among various rare events, the effective computation of transition paths
connecting metastable states in a stochastic model is an important problem.
This paper proposes a stochastic optimal control formulation for transition
path problems in an infinite time horizon for Markov jump processes on polish
space. An unbounded terminal cost at a stopping time and a controlled
transition rate for the jump process regulate the transition from one
metastable state to another. The running cost is taken as an entropy form of
the control velocity, in contrast to the quadratic form for diffusion
processes. Using the Girsanov transformation for Markov jump processes, the
optimal control problem in both finite time and infinite time horizon with
stopping time fit into one framework: the optimal change of measures in the
C\`adl\`ag path space via minimizing their relative entropy. We prove that the
committor function, solved from the backward equation with appropriate boundary
conditions, yields an explicit formula for the optimal path measure and the
associated optimal control for the transition path problem. The unbounded
terminal cost leads to a singular transition rate (unbounded control velocity),
for which, the Gamma convergence technique is applied to pass the limit for a
regularized optimal path measure. The limiting path measure is proved to solve
a Martingale problem with an optimally controlled transition rate and the
associated optimal control is given by Doob-h transformation. The resulting
optimally controlled process can realize the transitions almost surely.Comment: 31 page
κΈμ΅ μνμμμ μμ κ²½κ³ λ¬Έμ
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (λ°μ¬) -- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : μμ°κ³Όνλν μ리과νλΆ, 2021. 2. κ°λͺ
μ£Ό.This thesis focuses on theoretically investigating the free boundary problems which arise from two classical problems in mathematical finance: portfolio selection and optimal contract of principal-agent theory. In these two problems, the mathematical structure is not represented as a solely optimal stopping time problem but is formulated in a mixture form in which optimal stopping time is combined with stochastic control or singular control. In this structure, the characterization of the free boundary for optimal stopping time is subtle and the verification theorem of the optimality for the candidate control and stopping time is difficult to prove. To overcome these difficulties, we utilize the dual/martingale method, and then we analyze the variational inequality arising from the dual problem and formally provide the derivation of the solution to the variational inequality. In the thesis, we make a technical contribution by fully characterizing the free boundary and providing the duality and verification theorems. Based on the analytic results, we seek to gain further insight into two classical problems under several realistic model setups.λ³Έ νμ λ
Όλ¬Έμ κΈμ΅μνμ λνμ μΈ λ κ°μ§ λ¬Έμ μΈ ν¬νΈν΄λ¦¬μ€ μ΄λ‘ , μ΅μ κ³μ½ μ΄λ‘ μμ μΌμ΄λλ μμ κ²½κ³ λ¬Έμ (free boundary problem) μ λν ν΄μμ λΆμμ λ€λ£¬λ€. λ λ¬Έμ μμμ μνμ ꡬ쑰λ λ¨μν μ΅μ μ μ§ μκ° (optimal stopping time) λ¬Έμ λ‘ λνλλ κ²μ΄ μλλΌ νλ₯ μ μ μ΄ (stochastic control) νΉμ λ¨μΌ μ μ΄ (singular control) μ ν¨κ» κ²°ν©λ ννλ‘ κ·μ°©λλ€. μ΄λ¬ν ꡬ쑰λ μ΅μ μ μ§ μκ°μ λν μμ κ²½κ³μ λΆμμ΄ λ―Έλ¬νμ¬ νλ₯ μ μ μ΄ λ° μ μ§ μκ°μ λν μ΅μ μ± (optimality) μ¦λͺ
μ΄ μ΄λ ΅λ€. λ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ μ΄μ€/λ§ν
κ²μΌ (dual/martingale) μ΄λ‘ μ νμ©νμ¬ μ΄μ€ λ¬Έμ (dual problem) μμ λ°μνλ λ³λΆ λΆλ±μ (variational inequality) μ μ±μ§μ λΆμνκ³ κ·Έμ λν ν΄μ λμΆκ³Όμ μ μ μνλ€. μ΄λ₯Ό ν΅ν΄ μμ κ²½κ³λ₯Ό μμ ν νΉμ§ννκ³ μ΄μ€μ± λ° μ΅μ μ± μ¦λͺ
μ ν¨κ» μ μνλ€. μ΄λ¬ν ν΄μμ κ²°κ³Όμ κΈ°λ° νμ¬ μ¬λ¬ κ°μ§ νμ€μ μΈ λͺ¨λΈμμμ ν¬νΈν΄λ¦¬μ€ λ° μ΅μ κ³μ½ μ΄λ‘ λν κ²½μ νμ μλ―Έλ₯Ό μ 곡νλ€.Contents
Abstract i
1 Introduction 1
2 Optimal stopping in portfolio selection 7
2.1 Retirement decision in consumption-leisure and investment
problem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.1 Model and optimization problem . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
2.1.2 Main results: optimal retirement time and duality theorem. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
2.1.3 Variational inequality: ODE analysis . . . . . . . . . . 15
2.1.4 Proof of Proposition 2.1.7 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
2.1.5 Proof of Theorem 2.1.8 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
2.2 Risk preference change in consumption and investment problem 24
2.2.1 Model and optimization problem . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
2.2.2 Main results: optimal preference change time and duality theorem . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
2.2.3 Variational inequality: PDE analysis . . . . . . . . . . 30
2.2.4 Proof of Theorem 2.2.4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
2.2.5 Proof of Theorem 2.2.5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35
3 Singular control in portfolio selection 38
3.1 Consumption Ratcheting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38
3.1.1 Model and optimization problem . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
3.1.2 Singular control and optimal stopping . . . . . . . . . 41
3.1.3 Main results: optimal consumption with ratcheting and retirement decision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
3.1.4 Proof of lemmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 50
3.1.5 Proof of Theorem 3.1.10 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56
3.1.6 Proof of Theorem 3.1.18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59
3.2 Drawdown Constraint on Consumption . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
3.2.1 Model and optimization problem . . . . . . . . . . . . 65
3.2.2 Two dimensional singular control problem . . . . . . . 67
3.2.3 Main Results: optimal maximum process and optimal
strategies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69
3.2.4 Proof of lemmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77
3.2.5 Proof of Proposition 3.2.15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 87
3.2.6 Proof of Theorem 3.2.17 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90
3.2.7 Proof of Theorem 3.2.18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96
4 Singular control in contract theory 99
4.1 Limited Commitment in Finite time horizon . . . . . . . . . . 99
4.1.1 Model and optimization problem . . . . . . . . . . . . 99
4.1.2 Singular control in nite time-horizon . . . . . . . . . 103
4.1.3 Main results: optimal contract with limited commitment 114
4.1.4 Proof of lemmas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 118
4.1.5 Proof of Proposition 4.1.16 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 124
4.1.6 Proof of Proposition 4.1.18 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 125
4.1.7 Proof of Theorem 4.1.19 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 126
4.1.8 Proof of Proposition 4.1.21 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 131
4.1.9 Miscellaneous . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133
Abstract (in Korean) 141
Acknowledgement (in Korean) 142Docto
On an optimal extraction problem with regime switching
Ferrari G, Yang S. On an optimal extraction problem with regime switching. Center for Mathematical Economics Working Papers. Vol 562. Bielefeld: Center for Mathematical Economics; 2016.This paper studies an optimal irreversible extraction problem of an exhaustible
commodity in presence of regime shifts. A company extracts a natural resource from a reserve
with finite capacity, and sells it in the market at a spot price that evolves according to a Brownian
motion with volatility modulated by a two state Markov chain. In this setting, the company
aims at finding the extraction rule that maximizes its expected, discounted net cash
flow. The problem is set up as a finite-fuel two-dimensional degenerate singular stochastic control problem
over an infinite time-horizon. We provide explicit expressions both for the value function and for
the optimal control. We show that the latter prescribes a Skorokhod reflection of the optimally
controlled state process at a certain state and price dependent threshold. This curve is given
in terms of the optimal stopping boundary of an auxiliary family of perpetual optimal selling
problems with regime switching. The techniques are those of stochastic calculus and stochastic
optimal control theory
A unifying view on the irreversible investment exercise boundary in a stochastic, time-inhomogeneous capacity expansion problem
This paper studies the investment exercise boundary erasing in a stochastic,
continuous time capacity expansion problem with irreversible investment on the
finite time interval and a state dependent scrap value associated with
the production facility at the finite horizon . The capacity process is a
time-inhomogeneous diffusion in which a monotone nondecreasing, possibly
singular, process representing the cumulative investment enters additively. The
levels of capacity, employment and operating capital contribute to the firm's
production and are optimally chosen in order to maximize the expected total
discounted profits. Two different approaches are employed to study and
characterize the boundary. From one side, some first order condition are solved
by using the Bank and El Karoui Representation Theorem, and that sheds further
light on the connection between the threshold which the optimal policy of the
singular stochastic control problem activates at and the optional solution of
Representation Theorem. Its application in the presence of the scrap value is
new. It is accomplished by a suitable devise to overcome the difficulties due
to the presence of a non integral term in the maximizing functional. The
optimal investment process is shown to become active at the so-called "base
capacity" level, given as the unique solution of an integral equation. On the
other hand, when the coefficients of the uncontrolled capacity process are
deterministic, the optimal stopping problem classically associated to the
original capacity problem is resumed and some essential properties of the
investment exercise boundary are obtained. The optimal investment process is
proved to be continuous. Unifying approaches and views, the exercise boundary
is shown to coincide with the base capacity, hence it is characterized by an
integral equation not requiring any a priori regularity
Controlled diffusion processes
This article gives an overview of the developments in controlled diffusion
processes, emphasizing key results regarding existence of optimal controls and
their characterization via dynamic programming for a variety of cost criteria
and structural assumptions. Stochastic maximum principle and control under
partial observations (equivalently, control of nonlinear filters) are also
discussed. Several other related topics are briefly sketched.Comment: Published at http://dx.doi.org/10.1214/154957805100000131 in the
Probability Surveys (http://www.i-journals.org/ps/) by the Institute of
Mathematical Statistics (http://www.imstat.org
Irreversible Investment under L\'evy Uncertainty: an Equation for the Optimal Boundary
We derive a new equation for the optimal investment boundary of a general
irreversible investment problem under exponential L\'evy uncertainty. The
problem is set as an infinite time-horizon, two-dimensional degenerate singular
stochastic control problem. In line with the results recently obtained in a
diffusive setting, we show that the optimal boundary is intimately linked to
the unique optional solution of an appropriate Bank-El Karoui representation
problem. Such a relation and the Wiener Hopf factorization allow us to derive
an integral equation for the optimal investment boundary. In case the
underlying L\'evy process hits any real point with positive probability we show
that the integral equation for the investment boundary is uniquely satisfied by
the unique solution of another equation which is easier to handle. As a
remarkable by-product we prove the continuity of the optimal investment
boundary. The paper is concluded with explicit results for profit functions of
(i) Cobb-Douglas type and (ii) CES type. In the first case the function is
separable and in the second case non-separable.Comment: 19 page
- β¦