A Privacy-Preserving Protocol for Network-Neutral Caching in ISP Networks

By performing in-network caching, Internet Service Providers (ISPs) allow Content Providers (CPs) to serve contents from locations closer to users. In this way, the pressure of content delivery on ISPs’ network is alleviated, and the users’ Quality-of-Experience (QoE) improved. Due to its impact on QoE, caching has been recently considered as a form of traffic prioritization in the debate on Network Neutrality (NN). A possible approach to perform NN-compliant caching consists in assigning the same portion of cache storage to all the CPs. However, this static subdivision does not consider the different popularities of the CPs’ contents and is therefore inefficient. Alternatively, the cache can be subdivided among the CPs proportionally to the popularity of their contents. However, CPs consider this information private and are reluctant to disclose it. In this work, we propose a protocol to perform a popularity-driven subdivision of the caches’ storage in a privacy-preserving and network-neutral fashion. The protocol is based on the Shamir Secret Sharing (SSS) scheme and is designed to ensure a NN-compliant subdivision of the caches while preserving the privacy of both CPs and ISP (i.e., contents’ popularity and caches’ size are not disclosed). Through dynamic simulation, we show that the popularity-driven cache subdivision (enforced by using our protocol) outperforms several baseline approaches in terms of overall network Resource Occupation (RO) and caching Hit-Ratios. Thanks to our numerical results, we observe that the frequency of execution of the protocol has a significant impact on the RO, and that the ISP can tune this frequency to minimize its RO while introducing an acceptable data overhead. Because of this tuning, several CPs may experience a loss with respect to the hit-ratio that they would obtain by independently choosing the frequency of execution. This loss is very limited, and the employment of the protocol is therefore beneficial to all the involved parties, especially since, by using it, CPs are guaranteed that the ISP behaves in a network-neutral manner

To be neutral or not neutral? the in-network caching dilemma

Caching allows Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to reduce network traffic and Content Providers (CPs) to increase the offered QoS. However, when contents are encrypted, effective caching is possible only if ISPs and CPs cooperate. We suggest possible forms of non-discriminatory cooperation that make caching compliant with the principles of Net-Neutrality (NN

Privacy-Preserving Edge Caching: A Probabilistic Approach

Edge caching (EC) decreases the average access delay of the end-users through caching popular content at the edge network, however, it increases the leakage probability of valuable information such as users preferences. Most of the existing privacy-preserving approaches focus on adding layers of encryption, which confronts the network with more challenges such as energy and computation limitations. We employ a chunk-based joint probabilistic caching (JPC) approach to mislead an adversary eavesdropping on the communication inside an EC and maximizing the adversary's error in estimating the requested file and requesting cache. In JPC, we optimize the probability of each cache placement to minimize the communication cost while guaranteeing the desired privacy and then, formulate the optimization problem as a linear programming (LP) problem. Since JPC inherits the curse of dimensionality, we also propose scalable JPC (SPC), which reduces the number of feasible cache placements by dividing files into non-overlapping subsets. We also compare the JPC and SPC approaches against an existing probabilistic method, referred to as disjoint probabilistic caching (DPC) and random dummy-based approach (RDA). Results obtained through extensive numerical evaluations confirm the validity of the analytical approach, the superiority of JPC and SPC over DPC and RDA

Privacy-Preserving Multi-Operator Contact Tracing for Early Detection of Covid19 Contagions

The outbreak of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) is imposing a severe worldwide lock-down. Contact tracing based on smartphones' applications (apps) has emerged as a possible solution to trace contagions and enforce a more sustainable selective quarantine. However, a massive adoption of these apps is required to reach the critical mass needed for effective contact tracing. As an alternative, geo-location technologies in next generation networks (e.g., 5G) can enable Mobile Operators (MOs) to perform passive tracing of users' mobility and contacts with a promised accuracy of down to one meter. To effectively detect contagions, the identities of positive individuals, which are known only by a Governmental Authority (GA), are also required. Note that, besides being extremely sensitive, these data might also be critical from a business perspective. Hence, MOs and the GA need to exchange and process users' geo-locations and infection status data in a privacy-preserving manner. In this work, we propose a privacy-preserving protocol that enables multiple MOs and the GA to share and process users' data to make only the final users discover the number of their contacts with positive individuals. The protocol is based on existing privacy-enhancing strategies that guarantee that users' mobility and infection status are only known to their MOs and to the GA, respectively. From extensive simulations, we observe that the cost to guarantee total privacy (evaluated in terms of data overhead introduced by the protocol) is acceptable, and can also be significantly reduced if we accept a negligible compromise in users' privacy

California, Are You There? It\u27s the Entertainment Industry Calling and We Need Net Neutrality

With online streaming rapidly replacing cable as the preferred method of media consumption for viewers, demand for online content is at an all-time high. Behind the scenes of the entertainment evolution is an open and neutral Internet that facilitates equal access to all online content. Until recently, the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) committed to preserving the neutral net by passing Net Neutrality regulations that prohibited Internet Service Providers (ISPs) from blocking, throttling, or prioritizing online content. That changed on December 14, 2017, when the FCC repealed Net Neutrality, lifting the restrictions that once prevented ISPs from differentially transmitting online content. ISPs are now free to create a hierarchy of content prioritization that favors the content they own and the content hosted by streaming services capable of paying the greatest prioritization fees. This hierarchy has the potential to reduce innovation in the online streaming service industry by creating financial barriers to entry that keep smaller streaming services out, limiting the diversity of content accessible by consumers. This Note first describes the history of the Internet’s regulation that preceded Net Neutrality’s repeal, then explains the repeal’s potential consequences on online streaming services and consumers. Next, this Note offers solutions to Net Neutrality’s repeal. Finally, this Note concludes with a call to action, encouraging those who care about the future of a neutral Internet to not stand idle

Network Neutrality: A Research Guide

The conclusion in a research handbook should emphasise the complexity of the problem than trying to claim a one-size-fits-all solution. I have categorised net neutrality into positive and negative (content discrimination) net neutrality indicating the latter as potentially harmful. Blocking content without informing customers appropriately is wrong: if it says ‘Internet service’, it should offer an open Internet (alongside walled gardens if that is expressly advertised as such). The issue of uncontrolled Internet flows versus engineered solutions is central to the question of a ‘free’ versus regulated Internet. A consumer- and citizen-orientated intervention depends on passing regulations to prevent unregulated nontransparent controls exerted over traffic via DPI equipment, whether imposed by ISPs for financial advantage or by governments eager to use this new technology to filter, censor and enforce copyright against their citizens. Unraveling the previous ISP limited liability regime risks removing the efficiency of that approach in permitting the free flow of information for economic and social advantage. These conclusions support a light-touch regulatory regime involving reporting requirements and co-regulation with, as far as is possible, market-based solutions. Solutions may be international as well as local, and international coordination of best practice and knowledge will enable national regulators to keep up with the technology ‘arms race’

I own the pipes, you call the tune? The net neutrality debate and its (ir)relevance for Europe

1The debate of the so-called “net neutrality” has been under the spotlight in the US for many years, whereas many believed it would not become an issue in Europe. However, over the past few months the need to revise the current regulatory framework to encourage investment in all-IP networks has led to greater attention for net neutrality and its consequences for investment and competition. After the Commission adopted a “light-touch” approach to the issue at the end of 2007, the European Parliament has started to reconsider the issue, and it is reportedly considering a move towards more pro-neutrality rules. This paper summarises the main issues at hand in the net neutrality debate and the views expressed by advocates and opponents of the neutrality principle. The problem is described from a multi-sided market perspective, stressing the role of network operators as intermediaries in the “layered” architecture of all-IP networks. Finally, the paper discusses whether the European regulatory framework and its interaction with ex post competition policy are likely to solve many of the concerns of net neutrality advocates without any need for ad hoc regulation; and whether currently proposed solutions are likely to prove welfare-enhancing and conducive to a better regulatory environment for future e-communications.openopenRENDA A.Renda, Andre