230 research outputs found
On the Complexity of Digraph Colourings and Vertex Arboricity
It has been shown by Bokal et al. that deciding 2-colourability of digraphs
is an NP-complete problem. This result was later on extended by Feder et al. to
prove that deciding whether a digraph has a circular -colouring is
NP-complete for all rational . In this paper, we consider the complexity
of corresponding decision problems for related notions of fractional colourings
for digraphs and graphs, including the star dichromatic number, the fractional
dichromatic number and the circular vertex arboricity. We prove the following
results:
Deciding if the star dichromatic number of a digraph is at most is
NP-complete for every rational .
Deciding if the fractional dichromatic number of a digraph is at most is
NP-complete for every .
Deciding if the circular vertex arboricity of a graph is at most is
NP-complete for every rational .
To show these results, different techniques are required in each case. In
order to prove the first result, we relate the star dichromatic number to a new
notion of homomorphisms between digraphs, called circular homomorphisms, which
might be of independent interest. We provide a classification of the
computational complexities of the corresponding homomorphism colouring problems
similar to the one derived by Feder et al. for acyclic homomorphisms.Comment: 21 pages, 1 figur
Equitable partition of graphs into induced forests
An equitable partition of a graph is a partition of the vertex-set of
such that the sizes of any two parts differ by at most one. We show that every
graph with an acyclic coloring with at most colors can be equitably
partitioned into induced forests. We also prove that for any integers
and , any -degenerate graph can be equitably
partitioned into induced forests.
Each of these results implies the existence of a constant such that for
any , any planar graph has an equitable partition into induced
forests. This was conjectured by Wu, Zhang, and Li in 2013.Comment: 4 pages, final versio
Graph Treewidth and Geometric Thickness Parameters
Consider a drawing of a graph in the plane such that crossing edges are
coloured differently. The minimum number of colours, taken over all drawings of
, is the classical graph parameter "thickness". By restricting the edges to
be straight, we obtain the "geometric thickness". By further restricting the
vertices to be in convex position, we obtain the "book thickness". This paper
studies the relationship between these parameters and treewidth.
Our first main result states that for graphs of treewidth , the maximum
thickness and the maximum geometric thickness both equal .
This says that the lower bound for thickness can be matched by an upper bound,
even in the more restrictive geometric setting. Our second main result states
that for graphs of treewidth , the maximum book thickness equals if and equals if . This refutes a conjecture of Ganley and
Heath [Discrete Appl. Math. 109(3):215-221, 2001]. Analogous results are proved
for outerthickness, arboricity, and star-arboricity.Comment: A preliminary version of this paper appeared in the "Proceedings of
the 13th International Symposium on Graph Drawing" (GD '05), Lecture Notes in
Computer Science 3843:129-140, Springer, 2006. The full version was published
in Discrete & Computational Geometry 37(4):641-670, 2007. That version
contained a false conjecture, which is corrected on page 26 of this versio
Three ways to cover a graph
We consider the problem of covering an input graph with graphs from a
fixed covering class . The classical covering number of with respect to
is the minimum number of graphs from needed to cover the edges of
without covering non-edges of . We introduce a unifying notion of three
covering parameters with respect to , two of which are novel concepts only
considered in special cases before: the local and the folded covering number.
Each parameter measures "how far'' is from in a different way. Whereas
the folded covering number has been investigated thoroughly for some covering
classes, e.g., interval graphs and planar graphs, the local covering number has
received little attention.
We provide new bounds on each covering number with respect to the following
covering classes: linear forests, star forests, caterpillar forests, and
interval graphs. The classical graph parameters that result this way are
interval number, track number, linear arboricity, star arboricity, and
caterpillar arboricity. As input graphs we consider graphs of bounded
degeneracy, bounded degree, bounded tree-width or bounded simple tree-width, as
well as outerplanar, planar bipartite, and planar graphs. For several pairs of
an input class and a covering class we determine exactly the maximum ordinary,
local, and folded covering number of an input graph with respect to that
covering class.Comment: 20 pages, 4 figure
- …