5,477 research outputs found
Distinguishing Word Senses in Untagged Text
This paper describes an experimental comparison of three unsupervised
learning algorithms that distinguish the sense of an ambiguous word in untagged
text. The methods described in this paper, McQuitty's similarity analysis,
Ward's minimum-variance method, and the EM algorithm, assign each instance of
an ambiguous word to a known sense definition based solely on the values of
automatically identifiable features in text. These methods and feature sets are
found to be more successful in disambiguating nouns rather than adjectives or
verbs. Overall, the most accurate of these procedures is McQuitty's similarity
analysis in combination with a high dimensional feature set.Comment: 11 pages, latex, uses aclap.st
Boosting Applied to Word Sense Disambiguation
In this paper Schapire and Singer's AdaBoost.MH boosting algorithm is applied
to the Word Sense Disambiguation (WSD) problem. Initial experiments on a set of
15 selected polysemous words show that the boosting approach surpasses Naive
Bayes and Exemplar-based approaches, which represent state-of-the-art accuracy
on supervised WSD. In order to make boosting practical for a real learning
domain of thousands of words, several ways of accelerating the algorithm by
reducing the feature space are studied. The best variant, which we call
LazyBoosting, is tested on the largest sense-tagged corpus available containing
192,800 examples of the 191 most frequent and ambiguous English words. Again,
boosting compares favourably to the other benchmark algorithms.Comment: 12 page
Selective Sampling for Example-based Word Sense Disambiguation
This paper proposes an efficient example sampling method for example-based
word sense disambiguation systems. To construct a database of practical size, a
considerable overhead for manual sense disambiguation (overhead for
supervision) is required. In addition, the time complexity of searching a
large-sized database poses a considerable problem (overhead for search). To
counter these problems, our method selectively samples a smaller-sized
effective subset from a given example set for use in word sense disambiguation.
Our method is characterized by the reliance on the notion of training utility:
the degree to which each example is informative for future example sampling
when used for the training of the system. The system progressively collects
examples by selecting those with greatest utility. The paper reports the
effectiveness of our method through experiments on about one thousand
sentences. Compared to experiments with other example sampling methods, our
method reduced both the overhead for supervision and the overhead for search,
without the degeneration of the performance of the system.Comment: 25 pages, 14 Postscript figure
- …