7 research outputs found
Control of multiple model systems
This thesis considers the control of multiple model systems. These are systems for which only one model out of some finite set of models gives the system dynamics at any given time. In particular, the model that gives the system dynamics can change over time. This thesis covers some of the theoretical aspects of these systems, including controllability and stabilizability. As an application, ``overconstrained' mechanical systems are modeled as multiple model systems. Examples of such systems include distributed manipulation problems such as microelectromechanical systems and many wheeled vehicles such as the Sojourner vehicle of the Mars Pathfinder mission. Such systems are typified by having more Pfaffian constraints than degrees of freedom. Conventional classical motion planning and control theories do not directly apply to overconstrained systems. Control issues for two examples are specifically addressed. The first example is distributed manipulation. Distributed manipulation systems control an object's motion through contact with a high number of actuators. Stability results are shown for such systems and control schemes based on these results are implemented on a distributed manipulation test-bed. The second example is that of overconstrained vehicles, of which the Mars rover is an example. The nonlinear controllability test for multiple model systems is used to answer whether a kinematic model of the rover is or is not controllable
Towards Agility: Definition, Benchmark and Design Considerations for Small, Quadrupedal Robots
Agile quadrupedal locomotion in animals and robots is yet to be fully understood, quantified
or achieved. An intuitive notion of agility exists, but neither a concise definition nor a common
benchmark can be found. Further, it is unclear, what minimal level of mechatronic complexity
is needed for this particular aspect of locomotion.
In this thesis we address and partially answer two primary questions: (Q1) What is agile
legged locomotion (agility) and how can wemeasure it? (Q2) How can wemake agile legged
locomotion with a robot a reality?
To answer our first question, we define agility for robot and animal alike, building a common
ground for this particular component of locomotion and introduce quantitative measures
to enhance robot evaluation and comparison. The definition is based on and inspired by
features of agility observed in nature, sports, and suggested in robotics related publications.
Using the results of this observational and literature review, we build a novel and extendable
benchmark of thirteen different tasks that implement our vision of quantitatively classifying
agility. All scores are calculated from simple measures, such as time, distance, angles and
characteristic geometric values for robot scaling. We normalize all unit-less scores to reach
comparability between different systems. An initial implementation with available robots and
real agility-dogs as baseline finalize our effort of answering the first question.
Bio-inspired designs introducing and benefiting from morphological aspects present in nature
allowed the generation of fast, robust and energy efficient locomotion. We use engineering
tools and interdisciplinary knowledge transferred from biology to build low-cost robots able
to achieve a certain level of agility and as a result of this addressing our second question. This
iterative process led to a series of robots from Lynx over Cheetah-Cub-S, Cheetah-Cub-AL,
and Oncilla to Serval, a compliant robot with actuated spine, high range of motion in all joints.
Serval presents a high level of mobility at medium speeds. With many successfully implemented
skills, using a basic kinematics-duplication from dogs (copying the foot-trajectories
of real animals and replaying themotion on the robot using a mathematical interpretation),
we found strengths to emphasize, weaknesses to correct and made Serval ready for future
attempts to achieve even more agile locomotion. We calculated Servalâs agility scores with the
result of it performing better than any of its predecessors. Our small, safe and low-cost robot
is able to execute up to 6 agility tasks out of 13 with the potential to reachmore after extended
development. Concluding, we like to mention that Serval is able to cope with step-downs,
smooth, bumpy terrain and falling orthogonally to the ground
Second Annual Workshop on Space Operations Automation and Robotics (SOAR 1988)
Papers presented at the Second Annual Workshop on Space Operation Automation and Robotics (SOAR '88), hosted by Wright State University at Dayton, Ohio, on July 20, 21, 22, and 23, 1988, are documented herein. During the 4 days, approximately 100 technical papers were presented by experts from NASA, the USAF, universities, and technical companies. Panel discussions on Human Factors, Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Space Systems were held but are not documented herein. Technical topics addressed included knowledge-based systems, human factors, and robotics
Life Sciences Program Tasks and Bibliography for FY 1996
This document includes information on all peer reviewed projects funded by the Office of Life and Microgravity Sciences and Applications, Life Sciences Division during fiscal year 1996. This document will be published annually and made available to scientists in the space life sciences field both as a hard copy and as an interactive Internet web page