16 research outputs found
A Lower Bound for the Discrepancy of a Random Point Set
We show that there is a constant such that for all , , the point set consisting of points chosen uniformly at random in
the -dimensional unit cube with probability at least
admits an axis parallel rectangle containing points more than expected. Consequently, the
expected star discrepancy of a random point set is of order .Comment: 7 page
The inverse of the star-discrepancy problem and the generation of pseudo-random numbers
The inverse of the star-discrepancy problem asks for point sets of
size in the -dimensional unit cube whose star-discrepancy
satisfies where
is a constant independent of and . The first existence results in this
direction were shown by Heinrich, Novak, Wasilkowski, and Wo\'{z}niakowski in
2001, and a number of improvements have been shown since then. Until now only
proofs that such point sets exist are known. Since such point sets would be
useful in applications, the big open problem is to find explicit constructions
of suitable point sets .
We review the current state of the art on this problem and point out some
connections to pseudo-random number generators
On the Discrepancy of Jittered Sampling
We study the discrepancy of jittered sampling sets: such a set is generated for fixed by partitioning
into axis aligned cubes of equal measure and placing a random
point inside each of the cubes. We prove that, for sufficiently
large, where the upper bound with an unspecified constant
was proven earlier by Beck. Our proof makes crucial use of the sharp
Dvoretzky-Kiefer-Wolfowitz inequality and a suitably taylored Bernstein
inequality; we have reasons to believe that the upper bound has the sharp
scaling in . Additional heuristics suggest that jittered sampling should be
able to improve known bounds on the inverse of the star-discrepancy in the
regime . We also prove a partition principle showing that every
partition of combined with a jittered sampling construction gives
rise to a set whose expected squared discrepancy is smaller than that of
purely random points
Some Results on the Complexity of Numerical Integration
This is a survey (21 pages, 124 references) written for the MCQMC 2014
conference in Leuven, April 2014. We start with the seminal paper of Bakhvalov
(1959) and end with new results on the curse of dimension and on the complexity
of oscillatory integrals. Some small errors of earlier versions are corrected